Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Annie Sauer

dblp:309/8462 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational geometry · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
acquisition function optimization
0.612022
Triangulation candidates for Bayesian optimization · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.612022
Triangulation candidates for Bayesian optimization · NeurIPS 2022
Computational geometry › triangulation
delaunay triangulation
0.212022
Triangulation candidates for Bayesian optimization · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

delaunay triangulation · 1.1bayesian optimization · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Triangulation candidates for Bayesian optimization
abstract
Bayesian optimization involves "inner optimization" over a new-data acquisition criterion which is non-convex/highly multi-modal, may be non-differentiable, or may otherwise thwart local numerical optimizers. In such cases it is common to replace continuous search with a discrete one over random candidates. Here we propose using candidates based on a Delaunay triangulation of the existing input design. We detail the construction of these "tricands" and demonstrate empirically how they outperform both numerically optimized acquisitions and random candidate-based alternatives, and are well-suited for hybrid schemes, on benchmark synthetic and real simulation experiments.
Robert B. Gramacy, Annie Sauer, Nathan Wycoff
NeurIPS2