Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Naixuan Wang

dblp:309/9305 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Services computing and microservices · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Services computing and microservices › business process management
business process monitoring
0.712023
When to Invoke a Prediction Service for Business Process Monitoring? · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning
0.212023
When to Invoke a Prediction Service for Business Process Monitoring? · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

remaining time prediction · 1.3deep reinforcement learning · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 When to Invoke a Prediction Service for Business Process Monitoring?
abstract
Predictive monitoring of business processes aims at forecasting the future information of a business process and has gained increasing attention in recent years. With the development of cloud computing, prediction models, including remaining time prediction models, can be provided as cloud services. Reducing the number of invocation times of a remaining time prediction service is necessary since a large quantity of business process instances may be initiated and monitored every day. However, most of the current research focuses on designing new algorithms to improve prediction accuracy but there is no approach available to decide when to invoke a prediction service for each business process instance. In this article, we propose a deep reinforcement learning based strategy that can learn the policies of selecting prediction points for the remaining time prediction. Specifically, the learned policies can dynamically decide the next prediction point at which the remaining time prediction service will be invoked for a business process instance. We performed extensive experiments on five real-world datasets. The experiment results show this strategy can reduce the number of prediction points significantly and still maintain the high prediction accuracy.
Jian Cao 0001, Naixuan Wang, Shiyou Qian, Wei Guan 0006
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput.2