Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Naixuan Wang
dblp:309/9305
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Services computing and microservices · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Services computing and microservices › business process management
business process monitoring |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | When to Invoke a Prediction Service for Business Process Monitoring? · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | When to Invoke a Prediction Service for Business Process Monitoring? · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
remaining time prediction · 1.3deep reinforcement learning · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | When to Invoke a Prediction Service for Business Process Monitoring?abstractPredictive monitoring of business processes aims at forecasting the future information of a business process and has gained increasing attention in recent years. With the development of cloud computing, prediction models, including remaining time prediction models, can be provided as cloud services. Reducing the number of invocation times of a remaining time prediction service is necessary since a large quantity of business process instances may be initiated and monitored every day. However, most of the current research focuses on designing new algorithms to improve prediction accuracy but there is no approach available to decide when to invoke a prediction service for each business process instance. In this article, we propose a deep reinforcement learning based strategy that can learn the policies of selecting prediction points for the remaining time prediction. Specifically, the learned policies can dynamically decide the next prediction point at which the remaining time prediction service will be invoked for a business process instance. We performed extensive experiments on five real-world datasets. The experiment results show this strategy can reduce the number of prediction points significantly and still maintain the high prediction accuracy. Jian Cao 0001, Naixuan Wang, Shiyou Qian, Wei Guan 0006 |
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. | 2 |