Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Abbas Abdolmaleki
dblp:31/10265
· DBLP profile ↗
21ranked-venue papers
9as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6692-5856ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 21 · 9 first-author · 6 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
16 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 74% Motion planning and robot control · 10% Robot manipulation · 4% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 38, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
2.1 | 6 | 2020 | A distributional view on multi-objective policy optimization · ICML 2020 V-MPO: On-Policy Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimization for Discrete and Continuous Control · ICLR 2020 Model-Free Trajectory-based Policy Optimization with Monotonic Improvement · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
continuous control |
1.3 | 3 | 2022 | Evaluating Model-Based Planning and Planner Amortization for Continuous Control · ICLR 2022 Robust Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Control with Model Misspecification · ICLR 2020 Guide Actor-Critic for Continuous Control · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
1.2 | 2 | 2024 | Offline Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learning Scales to Large Models · ICML 2024 Keep Doing What Worked: Behavior Modelling Priors for Offline Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
actor-critic methods |
1.1 | 2 | 2024 | Offline Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learning Scales to Large Models · ICML 2024 Guide Actor-Critic for Continuous Control · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning |
1.1 | 2 | 2024 | Mastering Stacking of Diverse Shapes with Large-Scale Iterative Reinforcement Learning on Real Robots · ICRA 2024 Eager and Memory-Based Non-Parametric Stochastic Search Methods for Learning Control · ICRA 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning from negative feedback, or positive feedback or both · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
learning from feedback |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning from negative feedback, or positive feedback or both · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
preference learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning from negative feedback, or positive feedback or both · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning from negative feedback, or positive feedback or both · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy search |
0.8 | 3 | 2018 | Eager and Memory-Based Non-Parametric Stochastic Search Methods for Learning Control · ICRA 2018 Contextual Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolutionary Strategies · IJCAI 2017 Model-Based Relative Entropy Stochastic Search · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
maximum a posteriori policy optimization |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | V-MPO: On-Policy Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimization for Discrete and Continuous Control · ICLR 2020 Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimisation · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-task reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Offline Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learning Scales to Large Models · ICML 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning › robotic reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning for manipulation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Mastering Stacking of Diverse Shapes with Large-Scale Iterative Reinforcement Learning on Real Robots · ICRA 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Evaluating Model-Based Planning and Planner Amortization for Continuous Control · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic search |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Contextual Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolutionary Strategies · IJCAI 2017 Model-Based Relative Entropy Stochastic Search · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Data-efficient Hindsight Off-policy Option Learning · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy reinforcement learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Data-efficient Hindsight Off-policy Option Learning · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
option discovery |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Data-efficient Hindsight Off-policy Option Learning · ICML 2021 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
behavior modeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Keep Doing What Worked: Behavior Modelling Priors for Offline Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
distributional reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A distributional view on multi-objective policy optimization · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
model misspecification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Robust Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Control with Model Misspecification · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-objective reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A distributional view on multi-objective policy optimization · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
on-policy optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | V-MPO: On-Policy Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimization for Discrete and Continuous Control · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
preference specification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A distributional view on multi-objective policy optimization · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
robust reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Robust Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Control with Model Misspecification · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
expectation-maximization |
0.4 | 2 | 2025 | Learning from negative feedback, or positive feedback or both · ICLR 2025 Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimisation · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
monotonic improvement |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Model-Free Trajectory-based Policy Optimization with Monotonic Improvement · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
proximal policy optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Model-Free Trajectory-based Policy Optimization with Monotonic Improvement · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy search
contextual policy search |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Contextual Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolutionary Strategies · IJCAI 2017 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Model-Free Trajectory Optimization for Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
expectation-maximization · 1.6preference optimization · 0.9transformer · 0.8perceiver · 0.8off-policy reinforcement learning · 0.8iterative online/offline learning · 0.8behavioral cloning · 0.8planner amortization · 0.6model-based planning · 0.6dynamic programming inference · 0.5relative entropy · 0.2quadratic surrogate model · 0.2information-theoretic constraint · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Learning from negative feedback, or positive feedback or bothabstractExisting preference optimization methods often assume scenarios where paired preference feedback (preferred/positive vs. dis-preferred/negative examples) is available. This requirement limits their applicability in scenarios where only unpaired feedback—for example, either positive or negative— is available. To address this, we introduce a novel approach that decouples learning from positive and negative feedback. This decoupling enables control over the influence of each feedback type and, importantly, allows learning even when only one feedback type is present. A key contribution is demonstrating stable learning from negative feedback alone, a capability not well-addressed by current methods. Our approach builds upon the probabilistic framework introduced in (Dayan and Hinton, 1997), which uses expectation-maximization (EM) to directly optimize the probability of positive outcomes (as opposed to classic expected reward maximization). We address a key limitation in current EM-based methods: they solely maximize the likelihood of positive examples, while neglecting negative ones. We show how to extend EM algorithms to explicitly incorporate negative examples, leading to a theoretically grounded algorithm that offers an intuitive and versatile way to learn from both positive and negative feedback. We evaluate our approach for training language models based on human feedback as well as training policies for sequential decision-making problems, where learned value functions are available. Abbas Abdolmaleki, Bilal Piot, Bobak Shahriari, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Tim Hertweck, Michael Bloesch, Rishabh Joshi, Thomas Lampe, Junhyuk Oh, Nicolas Heess, Jonas Buchli, Martin A. Riedmiller |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | Offline Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learning Scales to Large ModelsabstractWe show that offline actor-critic reinforcement learning can scale to large models - such as transformers - and follows similar scaling laws as supervised learning. We find that offline actor-critic algorithms can outperform strong, supervised, behavioral cloning baselines for multi-task training on a large dataset; containing both sub-optimal and expert behavior on 132 continuous control tasks. We introduce a Perceiver-based actor-critic model and elucidate the key features needed to make offline RL work with self- and cross-attention modules. Overall, we find that: i) simple offline actor critic algorithms are a natural choice for gradually moving away from the currently predominant paradigm of behavioral cloning, and ii) via offline RL it is possible to learn multi-task policies that master many domains simultaneously, including real robotics tasks, from sub-optimal demonstrations or self-generated data. Jost Tobias Springenberg, Abbas Abdolmaleki, Jingwei Zhang 0001, Oliver Groth, Michael Bloesch, Thomas Lampe, Philemon Brakel, Sarah Bechtle, Steven Kapturowski, Roland Hafner, Nicolas Heess, Martin A. Riedmiller |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | Mastering Stacking of Diverse Shapes with Large-Scale Iterative Reinforcement Learning on Real RobotsabstractReinforcement learning solely from an agent’s self-generated data is often believed to be infeasible for learning on real robots, due to the amount of data needed. However, if done right, agents learning from real data can be surprisingly efficient through re-using previously collected sub-optimal data. In this paper we demonstrate how the increased understanding of off-policy learning methods and their embedding in an iterative online/offline scheme ("collect and infer") can drastically improve data-efficiency by using all the collected experience, which empowers learning from real robot experience only. Moreover, the resulting policy improves significantly over the state of the art on a recently proposed real robot manipulation benchmark. Our approach learns end-to-end, directly from pixels, and does not rely on additional human domain knowledge such as a simulator or demonstrations. Thomas Lampe, Abbas Abdolmaleki, Sarah Bechtle, Sandy H. Huang, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Michael Bloesch, Oliver Groth, Roland Hafner, Tim Hertweck, Michael Neunert, Markus Wulfmeier, Jingwei Zhang 0001, Francesco Nori, Nicolas Heess, Martin A. Riedmiller |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2022 | Evaluating Model-Based Planning and Planner Amortization for Continuous Control
Arunkumar Byravan, Leonard Hasenclever, Piotr Trochim, Mehdi Mirza, Alessandro Davide Ialongo, Yuval Tassa, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Abbas Abdolmaleki, Nicolas Heess, Josh Merel, Martin A. Riedmiller |
ICLR | 8 |
| 2022 | How to Spend Your Robot Time: Bridging Kickstarting and Offline Reinforcement Learning for Vision-based Robotic ManipulationabstractReinforcement learning (RL) has been shown to be effective at learning control from experience. However, RL typically requires a large amount of online interaction with the environment. This limits its applicability to real-world settings, such as in robotics, where such interaction is expensive. In this work we investigate ways to minimize online interactions in a target task, by reusing a suboptimal policy we might have access to, for example from training on related prior tasks, or in simulation. To this end, we develop two RL algorithms that can speed up training by using not only the action distributions of teacher policies, but also data collected by such policies on the task at hand. We conduct a thorough experimental study of how to use suboptimal teachers on a challenging robotic manipulation benchmark on vision-based stacking with diverse objects. We compare our methods to offline, online, offline-to-online, and kickstarting RL algorithms. By doing so, we find that training on data from both the teacher and student, enables the best performance for limited data budgets. We examine how to best allocate a limited data budget - on the target task - between the teacher and the student policy, and report experiments using varying budgets, two teachers with different degrees of suboptimality, and five stacking tasks that require a diverse set of behaviors. Our analysis, both in simulation and in the real world, shows that our approach is the best across data budgets, while standard offline RL from teacher rollouts is surprisingly effective when enough data is given. Alex X. Lee, Coline Devin, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Thomas Lampe, Abbas Abdolmaleki, Konstantinos Bousmalis |
IROS | 6 |
| 2021 | Data-efficient Hindsight Off-policy Option LearningabstractWe introduce Hindsight Off-policy Options (HO2), a data-efficient option learning algorithm. Given any trajectory, HO2 infers likely option choices and backpropagates through the dynamic programming inference procedure to robustly train all policy components off-policy and end-to-end. The approach outperforms existing option learning methods on common benchmarks. To better understand the option framework and disentangle benefits from both temporal and action abstraction, we evaluate ablations with flat policies and mixture policies with comparable optimization. The results highlight the importance of both types of abstraction as well as off-policy training and trust-region constraints, particularly in challenging, simulated 3D robot manipulation tasks from raw pixel inputs. Finally, we intuitively adapt the inference step to investigate the effect of increased temporal abstraction on training with pre-trained options and from scratch. Markus Wulfmeier, Dushyant Rao, Roland Hafner, Thomas Lampe, Abbas Abdolmaleki, Tim Hertweck, Michael Neunert, Dhruva Tirumala, Noah Y. Siegel, Nicolas Heess, Martin A. Riedmiller |
ICML | 5 |
| 2020 | Robust Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Control with Model Misspecification
Daniel J. Mankowitz, Nir Levine, Rae Jeong, Abbas Abdolmaleki, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Jackie Kay, Todd Hester, Timothy A. Mann, Martin A. Riedmiller |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2020 | Keep Doing What Worked: Behavior Modelling Priors for Offline Reinforcement Learning
Noah Y. Siegel, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Felix Berkenkamp, Abbas Abdolmaleki, Michael Neunert, Thomas Lampe, Roland Hafner, Nicolas Heess, Martin A. Riedmiller |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2020 | V-MPO: On-Policy Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimization for Discrete and Continuous Control
H. Francis Song, Abbas Abdolmaleki, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Aidan Clark, Hubert Soyer, Jack W. Rae, Seb Noury, Arun Ahuja, Siqi Liu 0002, Dhruva Tirumala, Nicolas Heess, Daniel Belov, Martin A. Riedmiller, Matt M. Botvinick |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2020 | A distributional view on multi-objective policy optimizationabstractMany real-world problems require trading off multiple competing objectives. However, these objectives are often in different units and/or scales, which can make it challenging for practitioners to express numerical preferences over objectives in their native units. In this paper we propose a novel algorithm for multi-objective reinforcement learning that enables setting desired preferences for objectives in a scale-invariant way. We propose to learn an action distribution for each objective, and we use supervised learning to fit a parametric policy to a combination of these distributions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on challenging high-dimensional real and simulated robotics tasks, and show that setting different preferences in our framework allows us to trace out the space of nondominated solutions. Abbas Abdolmaleki, Sandy H. Huang, Leonard Hasenclever, Michael Neunert, H. Francis Song, Martina Zambelli, Murilo Fernandes Martins, Nicolas Heess, Raia Hadsell, Martin A. Riedmiller |
ICML | 1 |
| 2018 | Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimisation
Abbas Abdolmaleki, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Yuval Tassa, Rémi Munos, Nicolas Heess, Martin A. Riedmiller |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2018 | Guide Actor-Critic for Continuous Control
Voot Tangkaratt, Abbas Abdolmaleki, Masashi Sugiyama |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2018 | Eager and Memory-Based Non-Parametric Stochastic Search Methods for Learning ControlabstractDirect policy search has shown to be a successful method to optimize robot controller parameters. However, defining a good parametric form for the controller can be challenging for complex problems. Non-parametric methods provide a flexible alternative and are thus a promising tool in robot skill learning. In this paper, we investigate two nonparametric methods based on similar principles but utilizing differing computing schedules: an eager learner and a memory-based learner. We compare the methods experimentally on two different control problems. Furthermore, we define and evaluate a new `hybrid' controller that combines the strong points of both of these methods. Victor Barbaros, Herke van Hoof, Abbas Abdolmaleki, David Meger |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2018 | Model-Free Trajectory-based Policy Optimization with Monotonic ImprovementabstractMany of the recent trajectory optimization algorithms alternate between linear approximation of the system dynamics around the mean trajectory and conservative policy update. One way of constraining the policy change is by bounding the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between successive policies. These approaches already demonstrated great experimental success in challenging problems such as end-to-end control of physical systems. However, the linear approximation of the system dynamics can introduce a bias in the policy update and prevent convergence to the optimal policy. In this article, we propose a new model-free trajectory-based policy optimization algorithm with guaranteed monotonic improvement. The algorithm backpropagates a local, quadratic and time-dependent \qfunc learned from trajectory data instead of a model of the system dynamics. Our policy update ensures exact KL-constraint satisfaction without simplifying assumptions on the system dynamics. We experimentally demonstrate on highly non-linear control tasks the improvement in performance of our algorithm in comparison to approaches linearizing the system dynamics. In order to show the monotonic improvement of our algorithm, we additionally conduct a theoretical analysis of our policy update scheme to derive a lower bound of the change in policy return between successive iterations. Riad Akrour, Abbas Abdolmaleki, Hany Abdulsamad, Jan Peters 0001, Gerhard Neumann |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2017 | Deriving and improving CMA-ES with information geometric trust regionsabstractCMA-ES is one of the most popular stochastic search algorithms. It performs favourably in many tasks without the need of extensive parameter tuning. The algorithm has many beneficial properties, including automatic step-size adaptation, efficient covariance updates that incorporates the current samples as well as the evolution path and its invariance properties. Its update rules are composed of well established heuristics where the theoretical foundations of some of these rules are also well understood. In this paper we will fully derive all CMA-ES update rules within the framework of expectation-maximisation-based stochastic search algorithms using information-geometric trust regions. We show that the use of the trust region results in similar updates to CMA-ES for the mean and the covariance matrix while it allows for the derivation of an improved update rule for the step-size. Our new algorithm, Trust-Region Co-variance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (TR-CMA-ES) is fully derived from first order optimization principles and performs favourably in compare to standard CMA-ES algorithm. Abbas Abdolmaleki, Bob Price, Nuno Lau, Luís Paulo Reis, Gerhard Neumann |
GECCO | 1 |
| 2017 | Contextual Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolutionary StrategiesabstractMany stochastic search algorithms are designed to optimize a fixed objective function to learn a task, i.e., if the objective function changes slightly, for example, due to a change in the situation or context of the task, relearning is required to adapt to the new context. For instance, if we want to learn a kicking movement for a soccer robot, we have to relearn the movement for different ball locations. Such relearning is undesired as it is highly inefficient and many applications require a fast adaptation to a new context/situation. Therefore, we investigate contextual stochastic search algorithms that can learn multiple, similar tasks simultaneously. Current contextual stochastic search methods are based on policy search algorithms and suffer from premature convergence and the need for parameter tuning. In this paper, we extend the well known CMA-ES algorithm to the contextual setting and illustrate its performance on several contextual tasks. Our new algorithm, called contextual CMA-ES, leverages from contextual learning while it preserves all the features of standard CMA-ES such as stability, avoidance of premature convergence, step size control and a minimal amount of parameter tuning. Abbas Abdolmaleki, Bob Price, Nuno Lau, Luís Paulo Reis, Gerhard Neumann |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2016 | Model-Free Trajectory Optimization for Reinforcement LearningabstractMany of the recent Trajectory Optimization algorithms alternate between local approximation of the dynamics and conservative policy update. However, linearly approximating the dynamics in order to derive the new policy can bias the update and prevent convergence to the optimal policy. In this article, we propose a new model-free algorithm that backpropagates a local quadratic time-dependent Q-Function, allowing the derivation of the policy update in closed form. Our policy update ensures exact KL-constraint satisfaction without simplifying assumptions on the system dynamics demonstrating improved performance in comparison to related Trajectory Optimization algorithms linearizing the dynamics. Riad Akrour, Gerhard Neumann, Hany Abdulsamad, Abbas Abdolmaleki |
ICML | 4 |
| 2016 | Non-parametric contextual stochastic searchabstractStochastic search algorithms are black-box optimizer of an objective function. They have recently gained a lot of attention in operations research, machine learning and policy search of robot motor skills due to their ease of use and their generality. Yet, many stochastic search algorithms require relearning if the task or objective function changes slightly to adapt the solution to the new situation or the new context. In this paper, we consider the contextual stochastic search setup. Here, we want to find multiple good parameter vectors for multiple related tasks, where each task is described by a continuous context vector. Hence, the objective function might change slightly for each parameter vector evaluation of a task or context. Contextual algorithms have been investigated in the field of policy search, however, the search distribution typically uses a parametric model that is linear in the some hand-defined context features. Finding good context features is a challenging task, and hence, non-parametric methods are often preferred over their parametric counter-parts. In this paper, we propose a non-parametric contextual stochastic search algorithm that can learn a non-parametric search distribution for multiple tasks simultaneously. In difference to existing methods, our method can also learn a context dependent covariance matrix that guides the exploration of the search process. We illustrate its performance on several non-linear contextual tasks. Abbas Abdolmaleki, Nuno Lau, Luís Paulo Reis, Gerhard Neumann |
IROS | 1 |
| 2016 | Learning a Humanoid Kick with Controlled Distance
Abbas Abdolmaleki, David Simões 0001, Nuno Lau, Luís Paulo Reis, Gerhard Neumann |
RoboCup | 1 |
| 2015 | Model-Based Relative Entropy Stochastic SearchabstractStochastic search algorithms are general black-box optimizers. Due to their ease of use and their generality, they have recently also gained a lot of attention in operations research, machine learning and policy search. Yet, these algorithms require a lot of evaluations of the objective, scale poorly with the problem dimension, are affected by highly noisy objective functions and may converge prematurely. To alleviate these problems, we introduce a new surrogate-based stochastic search approach. We learn simple, quadratic surrogate models of the objective function. As the quality of such a quadratic approximation is limited, we do not greedily exploit the learned models. The algorithm can be misled by an inaccurate optimum introduced by the surrogate. Instead, we use information theoretic constraints to bound the `distance' between the new and old data distribution while maximizing the objective function. Additionally the new method is able to sustain the exploration of the search distribution to avoid premature convergence. We compare our method with state of art black-box optimization methods on standard uni-modal and multi-modal optimization functions, on simulated planar robot tasks and a complex robot ball throwing task.The proposed method considerably outperforms the existing approaches. Abbas Abdolmaleki, Rudolf Lioutikov, Jan Peters 0001, Nuno Lau, Luís Paulo Reis, Gerhard Neumann |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2012 | A Distributed Cooperative Reinforcement Learning Method for Decision Making in Fire Brigade Teams
Abbas Abdolmaleki, Mostafa Movahedi, Nuno Lau, Luís Paulo Reis |
RoboCup | 1 |