Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brett G. Olivier
dblp:31/1406
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-5293-5321ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 86% Computational science and engineering · 14% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Fast Flux Module Detection Using Matroid Theory · RECOMB 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
kinetic modeling |
0.1 | 2 | 2005 | Modelling cellular systems with PySCeS · Bioinform. 2005 Web-based kinetic modelling using JWS Online · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology › computational cell biology
cell simulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Modelling cellular systems with PySCeS · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology › computational cell biology
cellular modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Modelling cellular systems with PySCeS · Bioinform. 2005 |
Computational science and engineering
numerical analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Modelling cellular systems with PySCeS · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology › computational systems biology
systems biology modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Web-based kinetic modelling using JWS Online · Bioinform. 2004 |
Distributed systems › distributed system architecture
client-server systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Web-based kinetic modelling using JWS Online · Bioinform. 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
matroid theory · 0.2numerical computation · 0.1numerical simulation · 0.1java applets · 0.0java applet · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Harmonizing semantic annotations for computational models in biologyabstractLife science researchers use computational models to articulate and test hypotheses about the behavior of biological systems. Semantic annotation is a critical component for enhancing the interoperability and reusability of such models as well as for the integration of the data needed for model parameterization and validation. Encoded as machine-readable links to knowledge resource terms, semantic annotations describe the computational or biological meaning of what models and data represent. These annotations help researchers find and repurpose models, accelerate model composition and enable knowledge integration across model repositories and experimental data stores. However, realizing the potential benefits of semantic annotation requires the development of model annotation standards that adhere to a community-based annotation protocol. Without such standards, tool developers must account for a variety of annotation formats and approaches, a situation that can become prohibitively cumbersome and which can defeat the purpose of linking model elements to controlled knowledge resource terms. Currently, no consensus protocol for semantic annotation exists among the larger biological modeling community. Here, we report on the landscape of current annotation practices among the COmputational Modeling in BIology NEtwork community and provide a set of recommendations for building a consensus approach to semantic annotation. Maxwell Lewis Neal, Matthias König 0003, David P. Nickerson, Goksel Misirli, Reza Kalbasi, Andreas Dräger, Koray Atalag, Vijayalakshmi Chelliah, Mike T. Cooling, Daniel L. Cook, Sharon M. Crook, Miguel de Alba, Samuel H. Friedman, Alan Garny, John H. Gennari, Padraig Gleeson, Martin Golebiewski, Michael Hucka, Nick S. Juty, Chris J. Myers, Brett G. Olivier, Herbert M. Sauro, Martin Scharm, Jacky L. Snoep, Vasundra Touré, Anil Wipat, Olaf Wolkenhauer, Dagmar Waltemath |
Briefings Bioinform. | 21 |
| 2015 | Interplay between Constraints, Objectives, and Optimality for Genome-Scale Stoichiometric ModelsabstractHigh-throughput data generation and genome-scale stoichiometric models have greatly facilitated the comprehensive study of metabolic networks. The computation of all feasible metabolic routes with these models, given stoichiometric, thermodynamic, and steady-state constraints, provides important insights into the metabolic capacities of a cell. How the feasible metabolic routes emerge from the interplay between flux constraints, optimality objectives, and the entire metabolic network of a cell is, however, only partially understood. We show how optimal metabolic routes, resulting from flux balance analysis computations, arise out of elementary flux modes, constraints, and optimization objectives. We illustrate our findings with a genome-scale stoichiometric model of Escherichia coli metabolism. In the case of one flux constraint, all feasible optimal flux routes can be derived from elementary flux modes alone. We found up to 120 million of such optimal elementary flux modes. We introduce a new computational method to compute the corner points of the optimal solution space fast and efficiently. Optimal flux routes no longer depend exclusively on elementary flux modes when we impose additional constraints; new optimal metabolic routes arise out of combinations of elementary flux modes. The solution space of feasible metabolic routes shrinks enormously when additional objectives---e.g. those related to pathway expression costs or pathway length---are introduced. In many cases, only a single metabolic route remains that is both feasible and optimal. This paper contributes to reaching a complete topological understanding of the metabolic capacity of organisms in terms of metabolic flux routes, one that is most natural to biochemists and biotechnologists studying and engineering metabolism. Timo R. Maarleveld, Meike T. Wortel, Brett G. Olivier, Bas Teusink, Frank J. Bruggeman |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 3 |
| 2014 | Fast Flux Module Detection Using Matroid Theory
Arne C. Reimers, Frank J. Bruggeman, Brett G. Olivier, Leen Stougie |
RECOMB | 3 |
| 2014 | COMBINE archive and OMEX format: one file to share all information to reproduce a modeling projectabstractBACKGROUND: With the ever increasing use of computational models in the biosciences, the need to share models and reproduce the results of published studies efficiently and easily is becoming more important. To this end, various standards have been proposed that can be used to describe models, simulations, data or other essential information in a consistent fashion. These constitute various separate components required to reproduce a given published scientific result. RESULTS: We describe the Open Modeling EXchange format (OMEX). Together with the use of other standard formats from the Computational Modeling in Biology Network (COMBINE), OMEX is the basis of the COMBINE Archive, a single file that supports the exchange of all the information necessary for a modeling and simulation experiment in biology. An OMEX file is a ZIP container that includes a manifest file, listing the content of the archive, an optional metadata file adding information about the archive and its content, and the files describing the model. The content of a COMBINE Archive consists of files encoded in COMBINE standards whenever possible, but may include additional files defined by an Internet Media Type. Several tools that support the COMBINE Archive are available, either as independent libraries or embedded in modeling software. CONCLUSIONS: The COMBINE Archive facilitates the reproduction of modeling and simulation experiments in biology by embedding all the relevant information in one file. Having all the information stored and exchanged at once also helps in building activity logs and audit trails. We anticipate that the COMBINE Archive will become a significant help for modellers, as the domain moves to larger, more complex experiments such as multi-scale models of organs, digital organisms, and bioengineering. Frank T. Bergmann, Richard R. Adams, Stuart L. Moodie, Jonathan Cooper, Mihai Glont, Martin Golebiewski, Michael Hucka, Camille Laibe, Andrew K. Miller, David P. Nickerson, Brett G. Olivier, Nicolas Rodriguez 0001, Herbert M. Sauro, Martin Scharm, Stian Soiland-Reyes, Dagmar Waltemath, Florent Yvon, Nicolas Le Novère |
BMC Bioinform. | 11 |
| 2005 | Modelling cellular systems with PySCeSabstractUNLABELLED: The Python Simulator for Cellular Systems (PySCeS) is an extendable research tool for the numerical analysis and investigation of cellular systems. AVAILABILITY: PySCeS is distributed as Open Source Software under the GNU General Public Licence and is available for download from http://pysces.sourceforge.net CONTACT: [email protected]. Brett G. Olivier, Johann M. Rohwer, Jan-Hendrik S. Hofmeyr |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2004 | Web-based kinetic modelling using JWS OnlineabstractUNLABELLED: JWS Online is a repository of kinetic models, describing biological systems, which can be interactively run and interrogated over the Internet. It is implemented using a client-server strategy where the clients, in the form of web browser based Java applets, act as a graphical interface to the model servers, which perform the required numerical computations. AVAILABILITY: The JWS Online website is publicly accessible at http://jjj.biochem.sun.ac.za/ with mirrors at http://www.jjj.bio.vu.nl/ and http://jjj.vbi.vt.edu/ Brett G. Olivier, Jacky L. Snoep |
Bioinform. | 1 |