Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Britton Wolfe

dblp:31/3470 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 45% Reinforcement learning · 42% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 13%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning › state representation learning
predictive state representation
0.242007
Relational Knowledge with Predictive State Representations · IJCAI 2007
Predictive state representations with options · ICML 2006
Combining Memory and Landmarks with Predictive State Representations · IJCAI 2005
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
relational knowledge
0.112007
Relational Knowledge with Predictive State Representations · IJCAI 2007
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
options framework
0.112006
Predictive state representations with options · ICML 2006
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › partially observable reinforcement learning
memory-based reinforcement learning
0.112005
Combining Memory and Landmarks with Predictive State Representations · IJCAI 2005
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › non-stationary reinforcement learning › continual reinforcement learning
reset-free reinforcement learning
0.112005
Learning predictive state representations in dynamical systems without reset · ICML 2005
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
temporal difference learning
0.112005
Learning predictive state representations in dynamical systems without reset · ICML 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

predictive state representation · 0.1linear PSR · 0.1hierarchical PSR · 0.1temporal difference learning · 0.1monte carlo algorithm · 0.1EM algorithm · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 High Precision Screening for Android Malware with Dimensionality Reduction
abstract
We present a new method of classifying previously unseen Android applications as malware or benign. The algorithm starts with a large set of features: the frequencies of all possible n-byte sequences in the application's byte code. Principal components analysis is applied to that frequency matrix in order to reduce it to a low-dimensional representation, which is then fed into any of several classification algorithms. We utilize the implicitly restarted Lanczos bidiagonalization algorithm and exploit the sparsity of the n-gram frequency matrix in order to efficiently compute the low-dimensional representation. When trained upon that low-dimensional representation, several classification algorithms achieve higher accuracy than previous work.
Britton Wolfe, Karim O. Elish, Danfeng Yao
ICMLA1
2014 Comprehensive Behavior Profiling for Proactive Android Malware Detection
Britton Wolfe, Karim O. Elish, Danfeng Yao
ISC1
2007 Relational Knowledge with Predictive State Representations
David Wingate, Vishal Soni, Britton Wolfe, Satinder Singh 0001
IJCAI3
2006 Predictive state representations with options
abstract
Recent work on predictive state representation (PSR) models has focused on using predictions of the outcomes of open-loop action sequences as state. These predictions answer questions of the form “What is the probability of seeing observation sequence o1, o2,..., oN if the agent takes action sequence a1, a2,..., aN from some given history?” We would like to ask more expressive questions in our representation of state, such as “If I behave according to some policy until I terminate, what will be my last observation?” We extend the linear PSR framework to answer questions like these about options – temporally extended, closed-loop courses of action – bounding the size of the linear PSR needed to model questions about a certain class of options. We introduce a hierarchical PSR (HPSR) that can make predictions about both options and primitive action sequences and show empirical results from learning HPSRs in simple domains. Existing work with predictive state representations (PSRs) focuses on using predictions about open-loop action sequences as state. These predictions answer questions of the form “What is the probability of seeing observation sequence o1, o2,..., oN if the agent takes action sequence a1, a2,..., aN in some given history?” Littman et al. (2002) showed that predictions of this form are sufficient in that they can perfectly capture state and can be used to make any prediction, i.e., answer any question, about the system. In general, the number of predictions in the state vector grows linearly with the number of underlying or hidden system states and this can be too large for practical purposes. Of course, if one truly wants a
Britton Wolfe, Satinder Singh 0001
ICML1
2005 Learning predictive state representations in dynamical systems without reset
abstract
Predictive state representations (PSRs) are a recently-developed way to model discrete-time, controlled dynamical systems. We present and describe two algorithms for learning a PSR model: a Monte Carlo algorithm and a temporal difference (TD) algorithm. Both of these algorithms can learn models for systems without requiring a reset action as was needed by the previously available general PSR-model learning algorithm. We present empirical results that compare our two algorithms and also compare their performance with that of existing algorithms, including an EM algorithm for learning POMDP models.
Britton Wolfe, Michael R. James 0001, Satinder Singh 0001
ICML1
2005 Combining Memory and Landmarks with Predictive State Representations
Michael R. James 0001, Britton Wolfe, Satinder Singh 0001
IJCAI2