Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Clinton Kelly IV
dblp:31/3793
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 33% Energy-efficient computing · 33% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 33% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Energy-efficient computing › energy management
low-power processor architecture |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | An ultra low-power processor for sensor networks · ASPLOS 2004 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › instruction set architecture › RISC
RISC processor |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | An ultra low-power processor for sensor networks · ASPLOS 2004 |
Embedded and real-time systems › wireless communication › wireless sensor networks
wireless sensor node |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | An ultra low-power processor for sensor networks · ASPLOS 2004 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
energy-efficient computing |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | An ultra low-power processor for sensor networks · ASPLOS 2004 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | An ultra low-power processor for sensor networks · ASPLOS 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hardware event queue · 0.1event-driven architecture · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | An ultra low-power processor for sensor networksabstractWe present a novel processor architecture designed specifically for use in low-power wireless sensor-network nodes. Our sensor network asynchronous processor (SNAP/LE) is based on an asynchronous data-driven 16-bit RISC core with an extremely low-power idle state, and a wakeup response latency on the order of tens of nanoseconds. The processor instruction set is optimized for sensor-network applications, with support for event scheduling, pseudo-random number generation, bitfield operations, and radio/sensor interfaces. SNAP/LE has a hardware event queue and event coprocessors, which allow the processor to avoid the overhead of operating system software (such as task schedulers and external interrupt servicing), while still providing a straightforward programming interface to the designer. The processor can meet performance levels required for data monitoring applications while executing instructions with tens of picojoules of energy.We evaluate the energy consumption of SNAP/LE with several applications representative of the workload found in data-gathering wireless sensor networks. We compare our architecture and software against existing platforms for sensor networks, quantifying both the software and hardware benefits of our approach. Virantha N. Ekanayake, Clinton Kelly IV, Rajit Manohar |
ASPLOS | 2 |
| 2003 | An Event-Synchronization Protocol for Parallel Simulation of Large-Scale Wireless NetworksabstractWe present a new conservative event-synchronization protocol, a time-based synchronization, for parallel discrete-event simulation of mobile ad hoc wireless networks. Simulators that use our protocol proceed at a scaled version of real time and send messages that correspond only to transmissions in the simulated network. We show that such simulators can maintain a constant execution time even as the sizes of the networks that they simulate grow. Moreover, we show that these simulators, when executed on a custom parallel architecture, are capable of simulating many networks faster than real time. Clinton Kelly IV, Rajit Manohar |
DS-RT | 1 |