Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Schiehlen

dblp:31/3837 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
15ranked-venue papers
14as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 15 · 14 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 60% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 15% Deep learning architectures and training · 15%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution
0.112011
Bootstrapping coreference resolution using word associations · ACL 2011
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing
0.112007
Global Learning of Labeled Dependency Trees · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training
global training
0.112007
Global Learning of Labeled Dependency Trees · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction
0.112007
Global Learning of Labeled Dependency Trees · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis
ellipsis resolution
0.012002
Ellipsis Resolution with Underspecified Scope · ACL 2002
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › grammar-based parsing
finite-state parsing
0.012003
Combining Deep and Shallow Approaches in Parsing German · ACL 2003
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
discourse representation theory
0.012002
Ellipsis Resolution with Underspecified Scope · ACL 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

word associations · 0.1underspecification · 0.0machine learning · 0.0cascaded finite-state parsing · 0.0underspecified discourse representation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Bootstrapping coreference resolution using word associations
Hamidreza Kobdani, Hinrich Schütze, Michael Schiehlen, Hans Kamp
ACL3
2007 Global Learning of Labeled Dependency Trees
Michael Schiehlen, Kristina Spranger
EMNLP-CoNLL1
2006 Language Independent Probabilistic Context-Free Parsing Bolstered by Machine Learning
Michael Schiehlen, Kristina Spranger
CoNLL1
2006 The Mass-Count Distinction: Acquisition and Disambiguation
Michael Schiehlen, Kristina Spranger
LREC1
2004 Annotation Strategies for Probabilistic Parsing in German
Michael Schiehlen
COLING1
2004 Optimizing Algorithms for Pronoun Resolution
Michael Schiehlen
COLING1
2004 Automatic Methods to Supplement Broad-Coverage Subcategorization Lexicons
Michael Schiehlen, Kristina Spranger
LREC1
2003 Combining Deep and Shallow Approaches in Parsing German
abstract
The paper describes two parsing schemes: a shallow approach based on machine learning and a cascaded finite-state parser with a hand-crafted grammar.It discusses several ways to combine them and presents evaluation results for the two individual approaches and their combination.An underspecification scheme for the output of the finite-state parser is introduced and shown to improve performance.
Michael Schiehlen
ACL1
2003 A Cascaded Finite-State Parser for German
Michael Schiehlen
EACL1
2002 Ellipsis Resolution with Underspecified Scope
abstract
The paper presents an approach to ellipsis resolution in a framework of scope underspecification (Underspecified Discourse Representation Theory). It is argued that the approach improves on previous proposals to integrate ellipsis resolution and scope underspecification (Crouch, 1995; Egg et al., 2001) in that application processes like anaphora resolution do not require full disambiguation but can work directly on the underspecified representation. Furthermore it is shown that the approach presented can cope with the examples discussed by Dalrymple et al. (1991) as well as a problem noted recently by Erk and Koller (2001).
Michael Schiehlen
ACL1
2002 Experiments in German Noun Chunking
Michael Schiehlen
COLING1
2000 Granularity Effects in Tense Translation
Michael Schiehlen
COLING1
2000 Robust Semantic Construction
Michael Schiehlen
COLING1
1996 Semantic Construction from Parse Forests
Michael Schiehlen
COLING1
1993 Localising Barriers Theory
Michael Schiehlen
EACL1