Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

D. I. Carson

dblp:31/4002 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.011993
On O(p2) algorithms for planarization · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1993
Electronic design automation › physical design
planarization
0.011993
On O(p2) algorithms for planarization · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1993
Graph algorithms and graph theory › planar graphs
planar graph algorithms
0.011993
On O(p2) algorithms for planarization · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vertex addition approach · 0.0PQ-tree · 0.0PQ tree · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1993 On O(p2) algorithms for planarization
abstract
A recent paper of R. Jayakumar et al. (ibid., vol.8, p.257-67, 1989) presented, for a given 2-connected nonplanar graph G, two O(p/sup 2/) planarization algorithms (where p is the number of vertices of G). The first algorithm provided a spanning planar subgraph H of G. Provided H is 2-connected, the second algorithm augmented H to a maximal planar subgraph H' of G. Both algorithms used the PQ-tree data structure and a vertex addition approach (i.e., building the subgraph H by adding one vertex at a time). Here, it is shown that the vertex addition approach cannot guarantee the construction of a 2-connected maximal planar subgraph, even if one exists. Also, as a partial answer to an open question by Jayakumar et al. It is shown that it is not guaranteed that a maximal planar subgraph of a 2-connected graph is itself 2-connected, even under the more stringent requirement that the initial graph have minimum degree 3. Since the vertex addition approach using PQ-trees requires the graph to be 2-connected, this result indicates that the vertex addition approach may not be appropriate for the efficient solution of the maximal planarization problem.>
D. I. Carson
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.1