Tomas Lindén

dblp:31/6553 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0009-0002-4847-8882ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 81% High-performance computing · 19%
Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud deployment
hybrid cloud
0.312018
Secure Cloud Connectivity for Scientific Applications · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2018
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
public displays
0.112010
Web-based framework for spatiotemporal screen real estate management of interactive public displays · WWW 2010
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › public displays
public interactive display
0.112010
Web-based framework for spatiotemporal screen real estate management of interactive public displays · WWW 2010
Cloud and datacenter computing
autoscaling
0.112018
Secure Cloud Connectivity for Scientific Applications · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2018
High-performance computing › scientific computing systems
scientific computing infrastructure
0.112018
Secure Cloud Connectivity for Scientific Applications · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

host identity protocol · 0.7web application integration · 0.1dynamic screen partitioning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Secure Cloud Connectivity for Scientific Applications
abstract
Cloud computing improves utilization and flexibility in allocating computing resources while reducing the infrastructural costs. However, in many cases cloud technology is still proprietary and tainted by security issues rooted in the multi-user and hybrid cloud environment. A lack of secure connectivity in a hybrid cloud environment hinders the adaptation of clouds by scientific communities that require scaling-out of the local infrastructure using publicly available resources for large-scale experiments. In this article, we present a case study of the DII-HEP secure cloud infrastructure and propose an approach to securely scale-out a private cloud deployment to public clouds in order to support hybrid cloud scenarios. A challenge in such scenarios is that cloud vendors may offer varying and possibly incompatible ways to isolate and interconnect virtual machines located in different cloud networks. Our approach is tenant driven in the sense that the tenant provides its connectivity mechanism. We provide a qualitative and quantitative analysis of a number of alternatives to solve this problem. We have chosen one of the standardized alternatives, Host Identity Protocol, for further experimentation in a production system because it supports legacy applications in a topologically-independent and secure way.
Lirim Osmani, Salman Zubair Toor, Miika Komu, Matti J. Kortelainen, Tomas Lindén, Rasib Hassan Khan, Paula Eerola, Sasu Tarkoma
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput.5
2010 UBI-hotspots: sustainable ecosystem infrastructure for real world urban computing research and business
abstract
We report a novel deployment of so-called UBI-hotspots in a city center to establish an ecosystem infrastructure for conducting diverse urban computing research and business in authentic urban setting. We focus on the value network of the hotspots where the commercial use of the hotspots generates revenue for covering their operational expenses. The value network has been validated by a 12-month long operation, during which the hotspots and their services have been available to the general public on 24/7 basis.
Timo Ojala, Ville Valkama, Hannu Kukka, Tommi Heikkinen, Tomas Lindén, Marko Jurmu, Fabio Kruger, Simo Hosio
MEDES5
2010 Web-based framework for spatiotemporal screen real estate management of interactive public displays
abstract
In this paper we present a web-based framework for spatiotemporal screen real estate management of interactive public displays. The framework facilitates dynamic partitioning of the screen real estate into virtual screens assigned for multiple concurrent web applications. The framework is utilized in the implementation of so-called UBI-hotspot, which provides various information services via different interaction modalities including mobile. The framework facilitates seamless integration of third party web applications residing anywhere in the public Internet into the UBI-hotspot, thus catering for a scalable and open architecture. We report the deployment of a network of indoor and outdoor UBI-hotspots at downtown Oulu, Finland. The quantitative data on the usage of the UBI-hotspots implicitly speaks in favor of the practical applicability of the framework.
Tomas Lindén, Tommi Heikkinen, Timo Ojala, Hannu Kukka, Marko Jurmu
WWW1
2010 Distributed Analysis in CMS
Alessandra Fanfani, M. Anzar Afaq, Jose Afonso Sanches, Julia Andreeva, Giuseppe Bagliesi, L. A. T. Bauerdick, Stefano Belforte, Patricia Bittencourt Sampaio, Kenneth Bloom, Barry Blumenfeld, Daniele Bonacorsi, Chris Brew, Marco Calloni, Daniele Cesini, Mattia Cinquilli, Giuseppe Codispoti, Jorgen D'Hondt, Danilo N. Dongiovanni, Giacinto Donvito, David Dykstra, Erik Edelmann, Ricky Egeland, Peter Elmer, Giulio Eulisse, Dave Evans, Federica Fanzago, Fabio Farina, Derek Feichtinger, Ian Fisk, Josep Flix, Claudio Grandi, Yuyi Guo, Kalle Happonen, José M. Hernández, Chih-Hao Huang, Kejing Kang, Edward Karavakis, Matthias Kasemann, Carlos Kavka, Akram Khan, Bockjoo Kim, Jukka Klem, Jesper Koivumäki, Thomas Kress, Peter Kreuzer, Tibor Kurca, Valentin Kuznetsov, Stefano Lacaprara, Kati Lassila-Perini, James Letts, Tomas Lindén, Lee Lueking, Joris Maes, Nicolò Magini, Gerhild Maier, Patricia McBride, Simon Metson, Vincenzo Miccio, Sanjay Padhi, Haifeng Pi, Hassen Riahi, Daniel Riley, Paul Rossman, Pablo Saiz, Andrea Sartirana, Andrea Sciabà, Vijay Sekhri, Daniele Spiga, Lassi A. Tuura, Eric Wayne Vaandering, Lukas Vanelderen, Petra Van Mulders, Aresh Vedaee, Ilaria Villella, Eric Wicklund, Tony Wildish, Christoph Wissing, Frank Würthwein
J. Grid Comput.52
2008 Interoperability between ARC and gLite - Understanding the Grid-Job Life Cycle
abstract
ARC and gLite are two of the leading production-ready Grid middleware solutions being used by thousands of researchers every day. Even though the middlewares leverage the same technologies, there are substantial architectural and implementation divergences. Today, users face difficulties trying to cross the boundaries of the two systems. The gLite clients have so far not been capable of accessing ARC resources and vice versa. This paper is a follow up on an earlier proposal on how to enable interoperability between these two middlewares. Further, the paper presents a thorough walkthrough of the protocols and steps involved in the submission of a job in grids built up of the two different middlewares.
Michael Grønager, Daniel Johansson, Josva Kleist, Christian Ulrik Søttrup, Anders Wäänänen, L. Field, D. Qing, Kalle Happonen, Tomas Lindén
eScience9