Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Heather M. Liddell
dblp:31/6724
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Face, body and person analysis · 74% 3D vision · 22% Representation and self-supervised learning · 4% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 56% Performance modeling and evaluation · 44% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face recognition |
0.1 | 2 | 2003 | Constructing Facial Identity Surfaces for Recognition · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2003 Constructing Facial Identity Surfaces in a Nonlinear Discriminating Space · CVPR (2) 2001 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d face modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Constructing Facial Identity Surfaces for Recognition · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2003 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Modelling Faces Dynamically across Views and Over Time · ICCV 2001 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face recognition › robust face recognition
multi-view face recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Constructing Facial Identity Surfaces in a Nonlinear Discriminating Space · CVPR (2) 2001 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face recognition › robust face recognition
pose-invariant face recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Constructing Facial Identity Surfaces in a Nonlinear Discriminating Space · CVPR (2) 2001 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d face reconstruction |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Modelling Faces Dynamically across Views and Over Time · ICCV 2001 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
discriminant analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Constructing Facial Identity Surfaces in a Nonlinear Discriminating Space · CVPR (2) 2001 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms
parallel algorithm design |
0.0 | 1 | 1983 | The Measurement of Performance on a Highly Parallel System · IEEE Trans. Computers 1983 |
Parallel and multicore computing
multiprocessor system |
0.0 | 1 | 1983 | The Measurement of Performance on a Highly Parallel System · IEEE Trans. Computers 1983 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
kernel discriminant analysis · 0.0identity surface · 0.0hybrid algorithms · 0.0benchmarking · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Support vector machine based multi-view face detection and recognition
Yongmin Li 0001, Shaogang Gong, Jamie Sherrah, Heather M. Liddell |
Image Vis. Comput. | 4 |
| 2003 | Constructing Facial Identity Surfaces for Recognition
Yongmin Li 0001, Shaogang Gong, Heather M. Liddell |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 3 |
| 2003 | Recognising trajectories of facial identities using kernel discriminant analysis
Yongmin Li 0001, Shaogang Gong, Heather M. Liddell |
Image Vis. Comput. | 3 |
| 2001 | Recognising Trajectories of Facial Identities Using Kernel Discriminant AnalysisabstractWe present a comprehensive approach to address three challenging problems in face recognition: modelling faces across multi-views, extracting the nonlinear discriminating features, and recognising moving faces dynamically in image sequences. A multi-view dynamic face model is designed to extract the shape-and-pose-free facial texture patterns. Kernel discriminant analysis, which employs the kernel technique to perform linear discriminant analysis in a high-dimensional feature space, is developed to extract the significant nonlinear features which maximise the between-class variance and minimise the within-class variance. Finally, an identity surface based face recognition is performed dynamically from video input by matching object and model trajectories. q 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Yongmin Li 0001, Shaogang Gong, Heather M. Liddell |
BMVC | 3 |
| 2001 | Constructing Facial Identity Surfaces in a Nonlinear Discriminating SpaceabstractRecognising face with large pose variation is more challenging than that in a fixed view, e.g. frontal-view, due to the severe non-linearity caused by rotation in depth, self-shading and self-occlusion. To address this problem, a multi-view dynamic face model is designed to extract the shape-and-pose-free facial texture patterns from multi-view face images. Kernel Discriminant Analysis is developed to extract the significant non-linear discriminating features which maximise the between-class variance and minimise the within-class variance. By using the kernel technique, this process is equivalent to a Linear Discriminant Analysis in a high-dimensional feature space which can be solved conveniently. The identity surfaces are then constructed from these non-linear discriminating features. Face recognition can be performed dynamically from an image sequence by matching an object trajectory and model trajectories on the identity surfaces. Yongmin Li 0001, Shaogang Gong, Heather M. Liddell |
CVPR (2) | 3 |
| 2001 | Modelling Faces Dynamically across Views and Over Time
Yongmin Li 0001, Shaogang Gong, Heather M. Liddell |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2000 | Recognising the Dynamics of Faces across Multiple ViewsabstractWe present an integrated framework for dynamic face detection and recognition, where head pose is estimated using Support Vector Regression, face detection is performed by Support Vector Classification, and recognition is carried out in a feature space constructed by Linear Discriminant Analysis. Unlike most traditional approaches to matching the patterns from static face images, we model the dynamics of human faces from video sequences in a consistent spatio-temporal context, i.e. recognition is accomplished by matching an object trajectory to a set of identity model trajectories in feature space. The model trajectories are synthesized from only a few views which sparsely cover the view sphere. Compared with the static face matching techniques, this approach is more robust and accurate under a coarse correspondence of face images, and has potential to visual interaction and advanced human behaviour recognition in real-world scenarios. 1 Introduction The issue of face rec... Yongmin Li 0001, Shaogang Gong, Heather M. Liddell |
BMVC | 3 |
| 2000 | Support Vector Regression and Classification Based Multi-View Face Detection and RecognitionabstractA support vector machine-based multi-view face detection and recognition framework is described. Face detection is carried out by constructing several detectors, each of them in charge of one specific view. The symmetrical property of face images is employed to simplify the complexity of the modelling. The estimation of head pose, which is achieved by using the support vector regression technique, provides crucial information for choosing the appropriate face detector. This helps to improve the accuracy and reduce the computation in multi-view face detection compared to other methods. For video sequences, further computational reduction can be achieved by using a pose change smoothing strategy. When face detectors find a face in frontal view, a support vector machine-based multi-class classifier is activated for face recognition. All the above issues are integrated under a support vector machine framework. Test results on four video sequences are presented, among them the detection rate is above 95%, recognition accuracy is above 90%, average pose estimation error is around 10/spl deg/, and the full detection and recognition speed is up to 4 frames/second on a Pentium II 300 PC. Yongmin Li 0001, Shaogang Gong, Heather M. Liddell |
FG | 3 |
| 2000 | Multi-view face detection using support vector machines and eigenspace modellingabstractAn approach to multi-view face detection based on head pose estimation is presented in this paper. Support vector regression is employed to solve the problem of pose estimation. Three methods, the eigenface method the support vector machine (SVM) based method, and a combination of the two methods, are investigated. The eigenface method, which seeks to estimate the overall probability distribution of patterns to be recognised, is fast but less accurate because of the overlap of confidence distributions between face and non-face classes. On the other hand, the SVM method, which tries to model the boundary of two classes to be classified is more accurate but slower as the number of support vectors is normally large. The combined method can achieve an improved performance by speeding up the computation and keeping the accuracy to a preset level. It can be used to automatically detect and track faces in face verification and identification systems. Yongmin Li 0001, Shaogang Gong, Jamie Sherrah, Heather M. Liddell |
KES | 4 |
| 1999 | High-Performance Computing and Networking Europe 1998
Heather M. Liddell |
Future Gener. Comput. Syst. | 1 |
| 1997 | HPCN96: General applications, computational and computer science
Peter M. A. Sloot, Heather M. Liddell |
Future Gener. Comput. Syst. | 2 |
| 1988 | Finite elements using long vectors of the DAP
C.-H. Lai, Heather M. Liddell |
Parallel Comput. | 2 |
| 1983 | The Measurement of Performance on a Highly Parallel SystemabstractThe problems of measuring the performance of a highly parallel multiple processor system, such as the 4096 element ICL Distributed Array Processor are presented in relation to the conventional methods used for serial processors; this is preceded by a brief description of the DAP hardware in order to. provide a framework for the discussion, together with some of the resulting implications for algorithm design. The importance of choosing algorithms for parallel computation in such a way as to make the best use of the parallelism of the hardware for the problem to be solved is discussed, and examples are given of parallel and hybrid algorithms—in the latter a mixture of serial and parallel techniques are used. A method of comparison of performance at the problem solving level is presented, which is illustrated by results obtained by DAP users studying problems which arise in a wide range of application areas. Dennis Parkinson, Heather M. Liddell |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |