EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peng Cui 0007
dblp:31/891-7
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-4216-1912ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 41% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25% Efficient and distributed learning · 18% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
uncertainty calibration |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Improving Accuracy and Calibration via Differentiated Deep Mutual Learning · CVPR 2025 Learning Sample Difficulty from Pre-trained Models for Reliable Prediction · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Neural Eigenfunctions are Structured Representation Learners · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
spectral representation learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Neural Eigenfunctions are Structured Representation Learners · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
structured representation learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Neural Eigenfunctions are Structured Representation Learners · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Accuracy and Calibration via Differentiated Deep Mutual Learning · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation › online knowledge distillation
mutual learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Accuracy and Calibration via Differentiated Deep Mutual Learning · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data selection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Accelerated Model Training via Bayesian Data Selection · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
selective classification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Sample Difficulty from Pre-trained Models for Reliable Prediction · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › efficient training
training acceleration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Accelerated Model Training via Bayesian Data Selection · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
learning with noisy labels |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Confidence-based Reliable Learning under Dual Noises · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
calibrated regression |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Calibrated Reliable Regression using Maximum Mean Discrepancy · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Calibrated Reliable Regression using Maximum Mean Discrepancy · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Calibrated Reliable Regression using Maximum Mean Discrepancy · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Calibrated Reliable Regression using Maximum Mean Discrepancy · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph representation learning
node representation learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Neural Eigenfunctions are Structured Representation Learners · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Information retrieval › hashing
compact binary codes |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Neural Eigenfunctions are Structured Representation Learners · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Information retrieval
image retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Neural Eigenfunctions are Structured Representation Learners · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Sample Difficulty from Pre-trained Models for Reliable Prediction · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural network parameterization · 2.0eigengame · 2.0eigendecomposition · 2.0pre-trained model · 1.3diversity-preserving objective · 0.9differentiated training · 0.9zero-shot predictors · 0.7mahalanobis distance · 0.7entropy regularization · 0.7bayesian inference · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Neural Eigenfunctions are Structured Representation LearnersabstractThis paper revisits the canonical concept of learning structured representations without label supervision by eigendecomposition. Yet, unlike prior spectral methods such as Laplacian Eigenmap which operate in a nonparametric manner, we aim to parametrically model the principal eigenfunctions of an integral operator defined by a kernel and a data distribution using a neural network for enhanced scalability and reasonable out-of-sample generalization. To achieve this goal, we first present a new series of objective functions that generalize the EigenGame Gemp et al. 2020 to function space for learning neural eigenfunctions. We then show that, when the similarity metric is derived from positive relations in a data augmentation setup, a representation learning objective function that resembles those of popular self-supervised learning methods emerges, with an additional symmetry-breaking property for producing structured representations where features are ordered by importance. We call such a structured, adaptive-length deep representation Neural Eigenmap. We demonstrate using Neural Eigenmap as adaptive-length codes in image retrieval systems. By truncation according to feature importance, our method requires up to $16\times$16× shorter representation length than leading self-supervised learning ones to achieve similar retrieval performance. We further apply our method to graph data and report strong results on a node representation learning benchmark with more than one million nodes. Zhijie Deng, Jiaxin Shi, Hao Zhang 0025, Peng Cui 0007, Cewu Lu, Jun Zhu 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 4 |
| 2025 | Improving Accuracy and Calibration via Differentiated Deep Mutual LearningabstractDeep Neural Networks (DNNs) have achieved remarkable success in a variety of tasks, particularly in terms of prediction accuracy. However, in real-world scenarios, especially in safety-critical applications, accuracy alone is insufficient; reliable uncertainty estimates are essential. Modern DNNs, often trained with cross-entropy loss, tend to exhibit overconfidence, especially on ambiguous samples. Many techniques aim to improve uncertainty calibration, yet they often come at the cost of reduced accuracy or increased computational demands. To address this challenge, we propose Differentiated Deep Mutual Learning (Diff-DML), an efficient ensemble approach that simultaneously enhances accuracy and uncertainty calibration. Diff-DML draws inspiration from Deep Mutual Learning (DML) while introducing two strategies to maintain prediction diversity: (1) Differentiated Training Strategy (DTS) and (2) Diversity-Preserving Learning Objective (DPLO). Our theoretical analysis shows that Diff-DML’s diversified learning framework not only leverages ensemble benefits but also avoids the loss of prediction diversity observed in traditional DML setups, which is crucial for improved calibration. Extensive evaluations on various benchmarks confirm the effectiveness of Diff-DML. For instance, on the CIFAR-100 dataset, Diff-DML on ResNet34/50 models achieved substantial improvements over the previous state-of-the-art method, MDCA, with absolute accuracy gains of 1.3%/3.1%, relative ECE reductions of 49.6%/43.8%, and relative classwise-ECE reductions of 7.7%/13.0%. Peng Cui 0007, Bingning Wang, Weipeng Chen, Jun Zhu 0001, Xiaolin Hu 0001 |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2025 | Deep sub-ensembles meets quantile regression: uncertainty-aware imputation for time series
Ying Liu 0096, Peng Cui 0007, Wenbo Hu 0001, Richang Hong |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 2025 | SDE-HNN: Accurate and Well-Calibrated Forecasting Using Stochastic Differential EquationsabstractIt is crucial yet challenging for deep learning models to properly characterize uncertainty that is pervasive in real-world environments. Heteroscedastic neural networks (HNNs) are promising methods that capture data uncertainty for forecasting problems while existing HNNs have difficulties in conjoining calibrated uncertainty estimation and satisfactory predictive performance due to the failure to construct an explicit interaction between the prediction and its associated uncertainty. This article develops SDE-HNN, an improved HNN equipped with stochastic differential equations (SDE), to characterize the interaction between the predictive mean and variance inside HNNs for accurate and reliable forecasting. The existence and uniqueness of the solution to the devised neural SDE are guaranteed. Moreover, based on the bias-variance tradeoff for the optimization in SDE-HNN, we design an enhanced numerical SDE solver to improve learning stability. Finally, we present two new diagnostic uncertainty metrics to systematically evaluate the predictive uncertainty. Experiments on various challenging datasets show that our method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on both predictive performance and uncertainty quantification, delivering well-calibrated and sharp prediction intervals in time-series forecasting. Peng Cui 0007, Zhijie Deng, Wenbo Hu 0001, Jun Zhu 0001 |
ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data | 1 |
| 2023 | Learning Sample Difficulty from Pre-trained Models for Reliable PredictionabstractLarge-scale pre-trained models have achieved remarkable success in many applications, but how to leverage them to improve the prediction reliability of downstream models is undesirably under-explored. Moreover, modern neural networks have been found to be poorly calibrated and make overconfident predictions regardless of inherent sample difficulty and data uncertainty. To address this issue, we propose to utilize large-scale pre-trained models to guide downstream model training with sample difficulty-aware entropy regularization. Pre-trained models that have been exposed to large-scale datasets and do not overfit the downstream training classes enable us to measure each training sample’s difficulty via feature-space Gaussian modeling and relative Mahalanobis distance computation. Importantly, by adaptively penalizing overconfident prediction based on the sample difficulty, we simultaneously improve accuracy and uncertainty calibration across challenging benchmarks (e.g., +0.55% ACC and −3.7% ECE on ImageNet1k using ResNet34), consistently surpassing competitive baselines for reliable prediction. The improved uncertainty estimate further improves selective classification (abstaining from erroneous predictions) and out-of-distribution detection. Peng Cui 0007, Zhijie Deng, Yinpeng Dong, Jun Zhu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Towards Accelerated Model Training via Bayesian Data SelectionabstractMislabeled, duplicated, or biased data in real-world scenarios can lead to prolonged training and even hinder model convergence. Traditional solutions prioritizing easy or hard samples lack the flexibility to handle such a variety simultaneously. Recent work has proposed a more reasonable data selection principle by examining the data's impact on the model's generalization loss. However, its practical adoption relies on less principled approximations and additional holdout data. This work solves these problems by leveraging a lightweight Bayesian treatment and incorporating off-the-shelf zero-shot predictors built on large-scale pre-trained models. The resulting algorithm is efficient and easy to implement. We perform extensive empirical studies on challenging benchmarks with considerable data noise and imbalance in the online batch selection scenario, and observe superior training efficiency over competitive baselines. Notably, on the challenging WebVision benchmark, our method can achieve similar predictive performance with significantly fewer training iterations than leading data selection methods. Zhijie Deng, Peng Cui 0007, Jun Zhu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Heterogeneous multi-task Gaussian Cox processes
Feng Zhou 0011, Quyu Kong, Zhijie Deng, Fengxiang He, Peng Cui 0007, Jun Zhu 0001 |
Mach. Learn. | 5 |
| 2022 | Confidence-based Reliable Learning under Dual NoisesabstractDeep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved remarkable success in a variety of computer vision tasks, where massive labeled images are routinely required for model optimization. Yet, the data collected from the open world are unavoidably polluted by noise, which may significantly undermine the efficacy of the learned models. Various attempts have been made to reliably train DNNs under data noise, but they separately account for either the noise existing in the labels or that existing in the images. A naive combination of the two lines of works would suffer from the limitations in both sides, and miss the opportunities to handle the two kinds of noise in parallel. This works provides a first, unified framework for reliable learning under the joint (image, label)-noise. Technically, we develop a confidence-based sample filter to progressively filter out noisy data without the need of pre-specifying noise ratio. Then, we penalize the model uncertainty of the detected noisy data instead of letting the model continue over-fitting the misleading information in them. Experimental results on various challenging synthetic and real-world noisy datasets verify that the proposed method can outperform competing baselines in the aspect of classification performance. Peng Cui 0007, Zhijie Deng, Jun Zhu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Calibrated Reliable Regression using Maximum Mean DiscrepancyabstractAccurate quantification of uncertainty is crucial for real-world applications of machine learning. However, modern deep neural networks still produce unreliable predictive uncertainty, often yielding over-confident predictions. In this paper, we are concerned with getting well-calibrated predictions in regression tasks. We propose the calibrated regression method using the maximum mean discrepancy by minimizing the kernel embedding measure. Theoretically, the calibration error of our method asymptotically converges to zero when the sample size is large enough. Experiments on non-trivial real datasets show that our method can produce well-calibrated and sharp prediction intervals, which outperforms the related state-of-the-art methods. Peng Cui 0007, Wenbo Hu 0001, Jun Zhu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | Guest Editorial: Query understanding
Liqiang Nie, Richang Hong, Peng Cui 0007 |
Neurocomputing | 3 |