EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Niccolò Tosi
dblp:31/9090
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot manipulation · 70% Reinforcement learning · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
action selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Action selection for touch-based localisation trading off information gain and execution time · ICRA 2014 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
tactile sensing |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Action selection for touch-based localisation trading off information gain and execution time · ICRA 2014 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › tactile sensing › tactile localization
touch-based object localization |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Action selection for touch-based localisation trading off information gain and execution time · ICRA 2014 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › tactile sensing › tactile perception
haptic exploration |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Action selection for touch-based localisation trading off information gain and execution time · ICRA 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
constrained optimization · 0.2belief-state reasoning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Action selection for touch-based localisation trading off information gain and execution timeabstractIn the context of touch-based object localisation, solving the problem of “where to sense next” is a challenging task due to the curse of dimensionality related to belief-state reasoning. We present a constrained optimisation scheme that computes the next best action maximising the trade off between (i) the localisation information gain, (ii) the time required for its computation, and (iii) the motion-execution time. This allows the robot programmer to have a deterministic influence on the length of every sensing action. The proposed methodology is applied to localise a solid object in 3D using a Staubli RX90 robot equipped with a force-torque sensor coupled with a spherical end effector. A case-study comparison of the task executed with two different time constraints is presented. Niccolò Tosi, Olivier David 0002, Herman Bruyninckx |
ICRA | 1 |