Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Neelkamal Bhuyan

dblp:310/1864 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Cloud and datacenter computing · 81% Performance modeling and evaluation · 19%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Energy systems and smart grids · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource management
cloud resource management
2.022026
Opportunistic Scheduling for Optimal Spot Instance Savings in the Cloud · INFOCOM 2026
Exploiting Spot Instances for Time-Critical Cloud Workloads Using Optimal Randomized Strategies · INFOCOM 2026
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource provisioning
spot instance management
2.022026
Opportunistic Scheduling for Optimal Spot Instance Savings in the Cloud · INFOCOM 2026
Exploiting Spot Instances for Time-Critical Cloud Workloads Using Optimal Randomized Strategies · INFOCOM 2026
Performance modeling and evaluation › scheduling policy
opportunistic scheduling
1.012026
Opportunistic Scheduling for Optimal Spot Instance Savings in the Cloud · INFOCOM 2026
Mathematical optimization
online optimization
0.812024
Best of Both Worlds Guarantees for Smoothed Online Quadratic Optimization · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
regret bounds
0.812024
Best of Both Worlds Guarantees for Smoothed Online Quadratic Optimization · ICML 2024
Energy systems and smart grids
demand response
0.212024
Best of Both Worlds Guarantees for Smoothed Online Quadratic Optimization · ICML 2024
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management
0.212024
Best of Both Worlds Guarantees for Smoothed Online Quadratic Optimization · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic analysis · 2.3dynamic interpolation · 2.3competitive analysis · 2.3optimization · 2.0randomized strategy · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Exploiting Spot Instances for Time-Critical Cloud Workloads Using Optimal Randomized Strategies
Neelkamal Bhuyan, Randeep Bhatia, Murali S. Kodialam, T. V. Lakshman
INFOCOM1
2026 Opportunistic Scheduling for Optimal Spot Instance Savings in the Cloud
Neelkamal Bhuyan, Randeep Bhatia, Murali S. Kodialam, T. V. Lakshman
INFOCOM1
2025 Optimizing Spot Instance Savings in the Cloud for Heterogeneous Demand through Priority Scheduling
abstract
This work addresses the problem of delay-sensitive job scheduling in cloud computing systems that offer two compute options: (i) low-cost, high-demand spot servers and (ii) high-cost on-demand servers. While prior research has focused on scheduling a single job, we consider a more practical scenario where a continuous stream of jobs, categorized into n different classes, must be managed. Each class i is characterized by an on-demand cost ki, an arrival rate λi, and an average delay constraint δi. With Poisson job arrivals and spot server availability modeled as an exponential service process, we optimize two key aspects: (i) the wait-time distribution for each job class and (ii) the precedence order for processing classes in case of scheduling conflicts. By modeling the system as a Markov chain, we formulate constrained optimization problems for two cases: (i) equal treatment of all job classes and (ii) priority-based scheduling, the latter introducing a combinatorial challenge. We propose algorithms to determine optimal wait-time distributions in both cases and demonstrate through numerical experiments that precedence-order optimization significantly improves performance, especially when delay constraints are not overly strict.
Neelkamal Bhuyan, Randeep Bhatia, Murali S. Kodialam, T. V. Lakshman
HPSR1
2024 Best of Both Worlds Guarantees for Smoothed Online Quadratic Optimization
abstract
We study the smoothed online quadratic optimization (SOQO) problem where, at each round $t$, a player plays an action $x_t$ in response to a quadratic hitting cost and an additional squared $\ell_2$-norm cost for switching actions. This problem class has strong connections to a wide range of application domains including smart grid management, adaptive control, and data center management, where switching-efficient algorithms are highly sought after. We study the SOQO problem in both adversarial and stochastic settings, and in this process, perform the first stochastic analysis of this class of problems. We provide the online optimal algorithm when the minimizers of the hitting cost function evolve as a general stochastic process, which, for the case of martingale process, takes the form of a distribution-agnostic dynamic interpolation algorithm that we call Lazy Adaptive Interpolation (LAI). Next, we present the stochastic-adversarial trade-off by proving an $\Omega(T)$ expected regret for the adversarial optimal algorithm in the literature (ROBD) with respect to LAI and, a sub-optimal competitive ratio for LAI in the adversarial setting. Finally, we present a best-of-both-worlds algorithm that obtains a robust adversarial performance while simultaneously achieving a near-optimal stochastic performance.
Neelkamal Bhuyan, Debankur Mukherjee, Adam Wierman
ICML1