Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zijing Xu
dblp:310/4172
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 50% Image and video coding · 50% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 50% Program analysis · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video coding
image quality assessment |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Exploring the Low-Pass Filtering Behavior in Image Super-Resolution · ICML 2024 |
Image and video processing › super-resolution
image super-resolution |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Exploring the Low-Pass Filtering Behavior in Image Super-Resolution · ICML 2024 |
Program analysis › program representation
abstract syntax tree analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fine-Grained Code Clone Detection with Block-Based Splitting of Abstract Syntax Tree · ISSTA 2023 |
Software maintenance and evolution
code clone detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fine-Grained Code Clone Detection with Block-Based Splitting of Abstract Syntax Tree · ISSTA 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
signal processing theory · 0.8hybrid response analysis · 0.8tree-based analysis · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Bridging the capacity gap: Asymmetric realignment for robust multimodal learning
Yunfeng Kou, Zijing Xu, Kunming Wu |
Neurocomputing | 2 |
| 2026 | Beyond Static Fusion: Instance-Adaptive Confidence Reallocation for Multimodal Emotion Recognition
Kunming Wu, Yunfeng Kou, Zijing Xu |
IEEE Signal Process. Lett. | 4 |
| 2024 | Exploring the Low-Pass Filtering Behavior in Image Super-ResolutionabstractDeep neural networks for image super-resolution (ISR) have shown significant advantages over traditional approaches like the interpolation. However, they are often criticized as ’black boxes’ compared to traditional approaches with solid mathematical foundations. In this paper, we attempt to interpret the behavior of deep neural networks in ISR using theories from the field of signal processing. First, we report an intriguing phenomenon, referred to as ‘the sinc phenomenon.’ It occurs when an impulse input is fed to a neural network. Then, building on this observation, we propose a method named Hybrid Response Analysis (HyRA) to analyze the behavior of neural networks in ISR tasks. Specifically, HyRA decomposes a neural network into a parallel connection of a linear system and a non-linear system and demonstrates that the linear system functions as a low-pass filter while the non-linear system injects high-frequency information. Finally, to quantify the injected high-frequency information, we introduce a metric for image-to-image tasks called Frequency Spectrum Distribution Similarity (FSDS). FSDS reflects the distribution similarity of different frequency components and can capture nuances that traditional metrics may overlook. Code, videos and raw experimental results for this paper can be found in: https://github.com/RisingEntropy/LPFInISR. Zijing Xu, Yule Duan 0001, Liang-Jian Deng |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | Fine-Grained Code Clone Detection with Block-Based Splitting of Abstract Syntax TreeabstractCode clone detection aims to find similar code fragments and gains increasing importance in the field of software engineering. There are several types of techniques for detecting code clones. Text-based or token-based code clone detectors are scalable and efficient but lack consideration of syntax, thus resulting in poor performance in detecting syntactic code clones. Although some tree-based methods have been proposed to detect syntactic or semantic code clones with decent performance, they are mostly time-consuming and lack scalability. In addition, these detection methods can not realize fine-grained code clone detection. They are unable to distinguish the concrete code blocks that are cloned. In this paper, we design Tamer, a scalable and fine-grained tree-based syntactic code clone detector. Specifically, we propose a novel method to transform the complex abstract syntax tree into simple subtrees. It can accelerate the process of detection and implement the fine-grained analysis of clone pairs to locate the concrete clone parts of the code. To examine the detection performance and scalability of Tamer, we evaluate it on a widely used dataset BigCloneBench. Experimental results show that Tamer outperforms ten state-of-the-art code clone detection tools (i.e., CCAligner, SourcererCC, Siamese, NIL, NiCad, LVMapper, Deckard, Yang2018, CCFinder, and CloneWorks). Tiancheng Hu, Zijing Xu, Yilin Fang, Yueming Wu 0001, Bin Yuan 0002, Deqing Zou, Hai Jin 0001 |
ISSTA | 2 |