Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ruimin Chu

dblp:310/4495 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-1738-6148ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › misinformation detection
disinformation detection
1.012026
An 8-Way Taxonomy for Multimodal Disinformation and Detection Benchmark · WWW 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

taxonomy · 2.0benchmark · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 An 8-Way Taxonomy for Multimodal Disinformation and Detection Benchmark
Shuhan Cui, Ruimin Chu, Hanrui Wang 0005, Patrick H. Chen, Ching-Chun Chang, Isao Echizen
WWW2
2023 Automatic meter error detection with a data-driven approach
Ruimin Chu, Li Chik, Jeffrey Chan, Kurt Gutzmann, Xiaodong Li 0001
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.1
2021 Detecting Lies: Finding the Degree of Falsehood from Observers' Physiological Responses
abstract
Lying is a common act in daily life and may have various degrees of falsehood. Deception detection has always been a fascinating area of research in which many studies have been conducted using subjects’ facial, verbal or bodily cues to spot potential deceit. However, none of the studies have investigated the physiological responses of observers in response to misleading statements with various degrees of falsehood. In this paper, we investigated this problem by first conducting designed experiments to collect participants’ physiological signals while they were watching stimulus videos with various falsehood levels. Then, the data was analysed using machine learning or deep learning models. Various challenges including relatively small amounts of training data and imbalanced classes have been addressed by implementing data augmentation. The results show that deep learning models, such as ResNet and VAE-LSTM, can predict the degree of falsehood with an F1-measure up to 0.83 from observers’ reactions when compared to the stimuli ground truth. This was attained when the model was trained with the most useful physiological signal in this study, Electrodermal Activity (EDA). This result indicates that observers’ physiological signals can be used as an indicator to determine the degree of falsehood for misleading statements. In the future, this system may be applied to provide an objective evaluation for deception detection.
Ruimin Chu, Jessica Sharmin Rahman, Sabrina B. Caldwell, Xuanying Zhu, Tom Gedeon
SMC1