EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eugenio Cuniato
dblp:310/5871
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-6406-3308ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Legged, aerial and field robots · 56% Motion planning and robot control · 41% Robot manipulation · 3% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots › aerial physical interaction
aerial manipulation |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Passive Aligning Physical Interaction of Fully-Actuated Aerial Vehicles for Pushing Tasks · ICRA 2024 Design and Control of a Micro Overactuated Aerial Robot with an Origami Delta Manipulator · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robot control |
1.2 | 2 | 2026 | Allocation for Omnidirectional Aerial Robots: Incorporating Power Dynamics · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2026 Passive Aligning Physical Interaction of Fully-Actuated Aerial Vehicles for Pushing Tasks · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
control allocation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Allocation for Omnidirectional Aerial Robots: Incorporating Power Dynamics · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2026 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robots |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Design and Control of a Micro Overactuated Aerial Robot with an Origami Delta Manipulator · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
overactuated control |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Design and Control of a Micro Overactuated Aerial Robot with an Origami Delta Manipulator · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Design and Control of a Micro Overactuated Aerial Robot with an Origami Delta Manipulator · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
actuator dynamics |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Allocation for Omnidirectional Aerial Robots: Incorporating Power Dynamics · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2026 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots › aerial robot design
fully-actuated aerial vehicle |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Passive Aligning Physical Interaction of Fully-Actuated Aerial Vehicles for Pushing Tasks · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot design
manipulator design |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Design and Control of a Micro Overactuated Aerial Robot with an Origami Delta Manipulator · ICRA 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
power dynamics modeling · 1.0differential allocation · 1.0force control · 0.8feedback linearization · 0.8stiffness characterization · 0.7origami delta manipulator · 0.7motion compensation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Allocation for Omnidirectional Aerial Robots: Incorporating Power DynamicsabstractTilt-rotor aerial robots are more dynamic and versatile than fixed-rotor platforms, since the thrust vector and body orientation are decoupled. However, the coordination of servos and propellers (the allocation problem) is not trivial, especially accounting for overactuation and actuator dynamics. We incrementally build and present three novel allocation methods for tilt-rotor aerial robots, comparing them to state-of-the-art methods on a real system performing dynamic maneuvers. We extend the state-of-the-art geometric allocation into a differential allocation, which uses the platform's redundancy and does not suffer from singularities. We expand it by incorporating actuator dynamics and propeller power dynamics. These allow us to model dynamic propeller acceleration limits, bringing two main advantages: balancing propeller speed without the need for nullspace goals and allowing the platform to selectively turn off propellers during flight, opening the door to new manipulation possibilities. We also use actuator dynamics and limits to normalize the allocation problem, making it easier to tune and allowing it to track 70% faster trajectories than a geometric allocation. Eugenio Cuniato, Mike Allenspach, Thomas Stastny, Helen Oleynikova, Roland Siegwart, Michael Pantic |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 1 |
| 2024 | Passive Aligning Physical Interaction of Fully-Actuated Aerial Vehicles for Pushing TasksabstractRecently, the utilization of aerial manipulators for performing pushing tasks in non-destructive testing (NDT) applications has seen significant growth. Such operations entail physical interactions between the aerial robotic system and the environment. End-effectors with multiple contact points are often used for placing NDT sensors in contact with a surface to be inspected. Aligning the NDT sensor and the work surface while preserving contact, requires that all available contact points at the end-effector tip are in contact with the work surface. With a standard full-pose controller, attitude errors often occur due to perturbations caused by modeling uncertainties, sensor noise, and environmental uncertainties. Even small attitude errors can cause a loss of contact points between the end-effector tip and the work surface. To preserve full alignment amidst these uncertainties, we propose a control strategy which selectively deactivates angular motion control and enables direct force control in specific directions. In particular, we derive two essential conditions to be met, such that the robot can passively align with flat work surfaces achieving full alignment through the rotation along non-actively controlled axes. Additionally, these conditions serve as hardware design and control guidelines for effectively integrating the proposed control method for practical usage. Real world experiments are conducted to validate both the control design and the guidelines. Tong Hui, Eugenio Cuniato, Michael Pantic, Marco Tognon, Matteo Fumagalli 0001, Roland Siegwart |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2023 | Design and Control of a Micro Overactuated Aerial Robot with an Origami Delta ManipulatorabstractThis work presents the mechanical design and control of a novel small-size and lightweight Micro Aerial Vehicle (MAV) for aerial manipulation. To our knowledge, with a total take-off mass of only 2.0 kg, the proposed system is the most lightweight Aerial Manipulator (AM) that has 8-DOF independently controllable: 5 for the aerial platform and 3 for the articulated arm. We designed the robot to be fully-actuated in the body forward direction. This allows independent pitching and instantaneous force generation, improving the platform's performance during physical interaction. The robotic arm is an origami delta manipulator driven by three servomotors, enabling active motion compensation at the end-effector. Its composite multimaterial links help reduce the weight, while their flexibility allow for compliant aerial interaction with the environment. In particular, the arm's stiffness can be changed according to its configuration. We provide an in depth discussion of the system design and characterize the stiffness of the delta arm. A control architecture to deal with the platform's overactuation while exploiting the delta arm is presented. Its capabilities are experimentally illustrated both in free flight and physical interaction, highlighting advantages and disadvantages of the origami's folding mechanism. Eugenio Cuniato, Christian Geckeler, Maximilian Brunner, Dario Strübin, Elia Bähler, Fabian Ospelt, Marco Tognon, Stefano Mintchev, Roland Siegwart |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2023 | Learning to Open Doors with an Aerial ManipulatorabstractThe field of aerial manipulation has seen rapid advances, transitioning from push-and-slide tasks to interaction with articulated objects. The motion trajectory of these complex actions is usually hand-crafted or a result of online optimization methods like Model Predictive Control (MPC) or Model Predictive Path Integral (MPPI) control. However, these methods rely on heuristics or model simplifications to efficiently run on onboard hardware, limiting their robustness, and making them sensitive to disturbances and differences between the real environment and its model. In this work, we propose a Reinforcement Learning (RL) approach to learn reactive motion behaviors for a manipulation task while producing policies that are robust to disturbances and modeling errors. Specifically, we train a policy to perform a door-opening task with an Omnidirectional Micro Aerial Vehicle (OMAV). The policy is trained in a physics simulator and shown in the real world, where it is able to generalize also to door closing tasks never seen in training. We also compare our method against a state-of-the-art MPPI solution in simulation, showing a considerable increase in robustness and speed. Eugenio Cuniato, Ismail Geles, Weixuan Zhang, Olov Andersson, Marco Tognon, Roland Siegwart |
IROS | 1 |