Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Minghao Yao

dblp:310/9227 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 65% Trustworthy machine learning · 35%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
1.922026
Model Stability Defense Against Model Poisoning in Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026
Forgetting Through Transforming: Enabling Federated Unlearning via Class-Aware Representation Transformation · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
robust federated learning
1.012026
Model Stability Defense Against Model Poisoning in Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning
federated learning defense
1.012026
Model Stability Defense Against Model Poisoning in Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning › poisoning attack
model poisoning attack
1.012026
Model Stability Defense Against Model Poisoning in Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › machine unlearning
class unlearning
0.912025
Forgetting Through Transforming: Enabling Federated Unlearning via Class-Aware Representation Transformation · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
federated unlearning
0.912025
Forgetting Through Transforming: Enabling Federated Unlearning via Class-Aware Representation Transformation · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
privacy
0.912025
Forgetting Through Transforming: Enabling Federated Unlearning via Class-Aware Representation Transformation · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.312026
Model Stability Defense Against Model Poisoning in Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

min-max optimization · 2.0jacobian norm minimization · 2.0empirical risk · 2.0contrastive learning · 0.9class-aware representation transformation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Model Stability Defense Against Model Poisoning in Federated Learning
abstract
Federated Learning (FL) exhibits susceptible to model poisoning attacks, which compromise the availability of the collaboratively trained model by introducing detrimental local updates during the training process. The predominant line of defense against such attacks has been to impose stringent restrictions on clients' model updates. However, this strategy raises new vulnerabilities where the global model can be infiltrated by meticulously crafted malicious perturbations. This vulnerability arises due to the model's inherent sensitivity to perturbations, making it exposed and fragile. In response, this work investigates a novel defensive paradigm centered on model stability-specifically, a model's resilience against perturbations within its parameter space. As a solution, we introduce a new method named Model Stability Defense for Federated Learning (MSDFL), designed to fortify the defense of FL systems against model poisoning attacks. MSDFL utilizes a minmax optimization framework, which is fundamentally linked to empirical risk for exploring the effects of model perturbations. The core aim of our approach is to minimize the norm of the model-output Jacobian matrix without compromising predictive performance, thereby establishing defense through enhanced model stability. Moreover, we propose a refined version of MSDFL, named Holistic Model Stability Defense for Federated Learning (HMSDFL), which considers model stability across all output dimensions of the logits to effectively eradicate the disparity in model convergence speed induced by MSDFL. Extensive experimental results fully demonstrate the fidelity, robustness, compatibility, and self-protection of our methods. The source codes are maintained athttps://github.com/qqoneone/MSDFL.
Di Wu 0062, Yong Qi 0001, Saiyu Qi, Qian Li 0024, Minghao Yao, Kaitai Liang
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput.6
2025 Forgetting Through Transforming: Enabling Federated Unlearning via Class-Aware Representation Transformation
abstract
Federated Unlearning (FU) enables clients to selectively remove the influence of specific data from a trained federated learning model, addressing privacy concerns and regulatory requirements. However, existing FU methods often struggle to balance effective erasure with model utility preservation, especially for class-level unlearning in non-IID settings. We propose Federated Unlearning via Class-aware Representation Transformation (FUCRT), a novel method that achieves unlearning through class-aware representation transformation. FUCRT employs two key components: (1) a transformation class selection strategy to identify optimal forgetting directions, and (2) a transformation alignment technique using dual class-aware contrastive learning to ensure consistent transformations across clients. Extensive experiments on four datasets demonstrate FUCRT's superior performance in terms of erasure guarantee, model utility preservation, and efficiency. FUCRT achieves complete (100\%) erasure of unlearning classes while maintaining or improving performance on remaining classes, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines across both IID and Non-IID settings. Analysis of the representation space reveals FUCRT's ability to effectively merge unlearning class representations with the transformation class from remaining classes, closely mimicking the model retrained from scratch.
Minghao Yao, Saiyu Qi, Yong Qi 0001, Bingyi Liu
ICCV3