Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Steven Grudman

dblp:311/2923 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0002-2504-9575ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational geometry · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural bioinformatics
1.222023
Optimal selection of suitable templates in protein interface prediction · Bioinform. 2023
INTERCAAT: identifying interface residues between macromolecules · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
protein evolution
0.712023
Optimal selection of suitable templates in protein interface prediction · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein-protein interaction prediction
protein interface prediction
0.712023
Optimal selection of suitable templates in protein interface prediction · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein sequence analysis
residue conservation
0.712023
Optimal selection of suitable templates in protein interface prediction · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein-protein interaction prediction
interface residue prediction
0.612022
INTERCAAT: identifying interface residues between macromolecules · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics › macromolecular structure analysis
macromolecular interface analysis
0.612022
INTERCAAT: identifying interface residues between macromolecules · Bioinform. 2022
Computational geometry
voronoi diagram
0.612022
INTERCAAT: identifying interface residues between macromolecules · Bioinform. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

voronoi tessellation · 1.1van der waals radii · 1.1mutual information · 0.7molecular docking · 0.7hierarchical clustering · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Optimal selection of suitable templates in protein interface prediction
abstract
MOTIVATION: Molecular-level classification of protein-protein interfaces can greatly assist in functional characterization and rational drug design. The most accurate protein interface predictions rely on finding homologous proteins with known interfaces since most interfaces are conserved within the same protein family. The accuracy of these template-based prediction approaches depends on the correct choice of suitable templates. Choosing the right templates in the immunoglobulin superfamily (IgSF) is challenging because its members share low sequence identity and display a wide range of alternative binding sites despite structural homology. RESULTS: We present a new approach to predict protein interfaces. First, template-specific, informative evolutionary profiles are established using a mutual information-based approach. Next, based on the similarity of residue level conservation scores derived from the evolutionary profiles, a query protein is hierarchically clustered with all available template proteins in its superfamily with known interface definitions. Once clustered, a subset of the most closely related templates is selected, and an interface prediction is made. These initial interface predictions are subsequently refined by extensive docking. This method was benchmarked on 51 IgSF proteins and can predict nontrivial interfaces of IgSF proteins with an average and median F-score of 0.64 and 0.78, respectively. We also provide a way to assess the confidence of the results. The average and median F-scores increase to 0.8 and 0.81, respectively, if 27% of low confidence cases and 17% of medium confidence cases are removed. Lastly, we provide residue level interface predictions, protein complexes, and confidence measurements for singletons in the IgSF. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code is freely available at: https://gitlab.com/fiserlab.org/interdct_with_refinement.
Steven Grudman, J. Eduardo Fajardo, András Fiser
Bioinform.1
2022 INTERCAAT: identifying interface residues between macromolecules
abstract
SUMMARY: The Interface Contact definition with Adaptable Atom Types (INTERCAAT) was developed to determine the atomic interactions between molecules that form a known three dimensional structure. First, INTERCAAT creates a Voronoi tessellation where each atom acts as a seed. Interactions are defined by atoms that share a hyperplane and whose distance is less than the sum of each atoms' Van der Waals radii plus the diameter of a solvent molecule. Interacting atoms are then classified and interactions are filtered based on compatibility. INTERCAAT implements an adaptive atom classification method; therefore, it can explore interfaces between a variety macromolecules. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code is freely available at: https://gitlab.com/fiserlab.org/intercaat. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Steven Grudman, J. Eduardo Fajardo, András Fiser
Bioinform.1