Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yongqi An

dblp:311/4374 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-4560-1654ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 46% Video understanding and tracking · 10% Image recognition and object detection · 10%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
2.632026
Improving Generalization in LLM Structured Pruning via Function-Aware Neuron Grouping · AAAI 2026
Systematic Outliers in Large Language Models · ICLR 2025
Fluctuation-Based Adaptive Structured Pruning for Large Language Models · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
structured pruning
1.822026
Improving Generalization in LLM Structured Pruning via Function-Aware Neuron Grouping · AAAI 2026
Fluctuation-Based Adaptive Structured Pruning for Large Language Models · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
1.012026
Improving Generalization in LLM Structured Pruning via Function-Aware Neuron Grouping · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
1.012026
Improving Generalization in LLM Structured Pruning via Function-Aware Neuron Grouping · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › 3D vision
outlier rejection
0.912025
Systematic Outliers in Large Language Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
transformer interpretability
0.912025
Systematic Outliers in Large Language Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › dynamic pruning
adaptive pruning
0.812024
Fluctuation-Based Adaptive Structured Pruning for Large Language Models · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › post-training pruning
retraining-free pruning
0.812024
Fluctuation-Based Adaptive Structured Pruning for Large Language Models · AAAI 2024
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
background subtraction
0.712023
ZBS: Zero-Shot Background Subtraction via Instance-Level Background Modeling and Foreground Selection · CVPR 2023
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
open-vocabulary object detection
0.712023
ZBS: Zero-Shot Background Subtraction via Instance-Level Background Modeling and Foreground Selection · CVPR 2023
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video object segmentation
0.712023
ZBS: Zero-Shot Background Subtraction via Instance-Level Background Modeling and Foreground Selection · CVPR 2023
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › open-vocabulary object detection
zero-shot object detection
0.712023
ZBS: Zero-Shot Background Subtraction via Instance-Level Background Modeling and Foreground Selection · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
self-attention
0.312025
Systematic Outliers in Large Language Models · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model inference
0.212024
Fluctuation-Based Adaptive Structured Pruning for Large Language Models · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

function-aware neuron grouping · 1.0theoretical derivation · 0.9activation analysis · 0.9fluctuation-based importance metric · 0.8bias compensation · 0.8instance-level background modeling · 0.7foreground selection · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Improving Generalization in LLM Structured Pruning via Function-Aware Neuron Grouping
Tao Yu 0013, Yongqi An, Kuan Zhu, Guibo Zhu, Ming Tang 0001, Jinqiao Wang
AAAI2
2025 Extracting Sparse Specialist Models from Generalist Models
abstract
Recently, several generalist models such as Contrastive Language Image Pre-training (CLIP) have demonstrated their capabilities of performing diverse downstream tasks through zero-shot or few-shot guidance. When these generalist models are used for the specific downstream task where only a fraction of features is relevant, they would suffer from a significant redundancy of parameters. While existing methods aim to achieve sparsity and specialization, they often require additional training and large datasets. In this paper, we propose a novel framework to extract a sparse specialist model from a generalist model using only few-shot samples, without any training. Our task-specific pruning framework defines task relevance metrics and employs weighted layer-wise pruning, preserving relevant features while removing redundancies. Experiments show that our method maintains nearly identical zero-shot accuracy compared to the original generalist models at 30% sparsity, with only minimal decline at 50%.
Tao Yu 0013, Xu Zhao 0003, Yongqi An, Guibo Zhu, Ming Tang 0001, Jinqiao Wang
ICASSP3
2025 Systematic Outliers in Large Language Models
abstract
Outliers have been widely observed in Large Language Models (LLMs), significantly impacting model performance and posing challenges for model compression. Understanding the functionality and formation mechanisms of these outliers is critically important. Existing works, however, largely focus on reducing the impact of outliers from an algorithmic perspective, lacking an in-depth investigation into their causes and roles. In this work, we provide a detailed analysis of the formation process, underlying causes, and functions of outliers in LLMs. We define and categorize three types of outliers—activation outliers, weight outliers, and attention outliers—and analyze their distributions across different dimensions, uncovering inherent connections between their occurrences and their ultimate influence on the attention mechanism. Based on these observations, we hypothesize and explore the mechanisms by which these outliers arise and function, demonstrating through theoretical derivations and experiments that they emerge due to the self-attention mechanism's softmax operation. These outliers act as implicit context-aware scaling factors within the attention mechanism. As these outliers stem from systematic influences, we term them systematic outliers. Our study not only enhances the understanding of Transformer-based LLMs but also shows that structurally eliminating outliers can accelerate convergence and improve model compression. The code is avilable at \url{https://github.com/an-yongqi/systematic-outliers}.
Yongqi An, Xu Zhao 0003, Tao Yu 0013, Ming Tang 0001, Jinqiao Wang
ICLR1
2024 Fluctuation-Based Adaptive Structured Pruning for Large Language Models
abstract
Network Pruning is a promising way to address the huge computing resource demands of the deployment and inference of Large Language Models (LLMs). Retraining-free is important for LLMs' pruning methods. However, almost all of the existing retraining-free pruning approaches for LLMs focus on unstructured pruning, which requires specific hardware support for acceleration. In this paper, we propose a novel retraining-free structured pruning framework for LLMs, named FLAP (FLuctuation-based Adaptive Structured Pruning). It is hardware-friendly by effectively reducing storage and enhancing inference speed. For effective structured pruning of LLMs, we highlight three critical elements that demand the utmost attention: formulating structured importance metrics, adaptively searching the global compressed model, and implementing compensation mechanisms to mitigate performance loss. First, FLAP determines whether the output feature map is easily recoverable when a column of weight is removed, based on the fluctuation pruning metric. Then it standardizes the importance scores to adaptively determine the global compressed model structure. At last, FLAP adds additional bias terms to recover the output feature maps using the baseline values. We thoroughly evaluate our approach on a variety of language benchmarks. Without any retraining, our method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods, including LLM-Pruner and the extension of Wanda in structured pruning. The code is released at https://github.com/CASIA-IVA-Lab/FLAP.
Yongqi An, Xu Zhao 0003, Tao Yu 0013, Ming Tang 0001, Jinqiao Wang
AAAI1
2024 Knowledge Distillation Dealing with Sample-Wise Long-Tail Problem
Tao Yu 0013, Xu Zhao 0003, Yongqi An, Ming Tang 0001, Jinqiao Wang
ACCV (10)3
2023 ZBS: Zero-Shot Background Subtraction via Instance-Level Background Modeling and Foreground Selection
abstract
Background subtraction (BGS) aims to extract all moving objects in the video frames to obtain binary foreground segmentation masks. Deep learning has been widely used in this field. Compared with supervised-based BGS methods, unsupervised methods have better generalization. However, previous unsupervised deep learning BGS algorithms perform poorly in sophisticated scenarios such as shadows or night lights, and they cannot detect objects outside the pre-defined categories. In this work, we propose an unsuper-vised BGS algorithm based on zero-shot object detection called Zero-shot Background Subtraction (ZBS). The proposed method fully utilizes the advantages of zero-shot object detection to build the open-vocabulary instance-level background model. Based on it, the foreground can be effectively extracted by comparing the detection results of new frames with the background model. ZBS performs well for sophisticated scenarios, and it has rich and extensible categories. Furthermore, our method can easily generalize to other tasks, such as abandoned object detection in unseen environments. We experimentally show that ZBS surpasses state-of-the-art unsupervised BGS methods by 4.70% F-Measure on the CDnet 2014 dataset. The code is released at https://github.com/CASIA-IVA-Lab/ZBS.
Yongqi An, Xu Zhao 0003, Tao Yu 0013, Haiyun Gu, Chaoyang Zhao, Ming Tang 0001, Jinqiao Wang
CVPR1