Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chengzu Li

dblp:311/5577 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-1879-7391ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Language models and text generation · 31% Vision and language · 25% Trustworthy machine learning · 22%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
confidence calibration
1.012026
LoVeC: Reinforcement Learning for Better Verbalized Confidence in Long-Form Generation · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination detection
1.012026
LoVeC: Reinforcement Learning for Better Verbalized Confidence in Long-Form Generation · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
long-form text generation
1.012026
LoVeC: Reinforcement Learning for Better Verbalized Confidence in Long-Form Generation · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
verbalized confidence
1.012026
LoVeC: Reinforcement Learning for Better Verbalized Confidence in Long-Form Generation · ACL (1) 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal reasoning
multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning
0.912025
Imagine While Reasoning in Space: Multimodal Visualization-of-Thought · ICML 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.912025
Imagine While Reasoning in Space: Multimodal Visualization-of-Thought · ICML 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning
0.812024
TopViewRS: Vision-Language Models as Top-View Spatial Reasoners · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › synthetic data generation
dataset generation
0.712023
Generating Data for Symbolic Language with Large Language Models · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › agentic language model
tool-augmented language models
0.712023
Binding Language Models in Symbolic Languages · ICLR 2023
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual reasoning
0.312025
Imagine While Reasoning in Space: Multimodal Visualization-of-Thought · ICML 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.212024
TopViewRS: Vision-Language Models as Top-View Spatial Reasoners · EMNLP 2024
Program synthesis and code generation › neural program synthesis
LLM-based program synthesis
0.212023
Binding Language Models in Symbolic Languages · ICLR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic language · 1.3prompting · 1.3language model · 1.3agreement-based verifier · 1.3verbalized confidence · 1.0self-consistency · 1.0reinforcement learning · 1.0token discrepancy loss · 0.9autoregressive generation · 0.9chain-of-thought reasoning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 LoVeC: Reinforcement Learning for Better Verbalized Confidence in Long-Form Generation
abstract
Hallucination remains a major challenge for the safe and trustworthy deployment of large language models (LLMs) in factual content generation.Prior work has explored confidence estimation as an effective approach to hallucination detection, but often relies on post-hoc self-consistency methods that require computationally expensive sampling.Verbalized confidence offers a more efficient alternative, but existing approaches are largely limited to shortform question answering (QA) tasks and do not generalize well to open-ended generation.In this paper, we propose LOVEC (Long-form Verbalized Confidence), a novel reinforcement learning (RL)-based method that trains LLMs to append an on-the-fly numerical confidence score to each generated statement during longform generation.The confidence score serves as a direct and interpretable signal of the factuality of generation.We introduce two evaluation settings, free-form tagging and iterative tagging, to assess different verbalized confidence estimation methods.Experiments on three long-form QA datasets show that our RLtrained models achieve better calibration and generalize robustly across domains.Also, our method is highly efficient, being 20× faster than traditional self-consistency methods while achieving better calibration.
Caiqi Zhang, Chengzu Li, Nigel Collier, Andreas Vlachos 0001
ACL (1)3
2025 Imagine While Reasoning in Space: Multimodal Visualization-of-Thought
abstract
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has proven highly effective for enhancing complex reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). Yet, it struggles in complex spatial reasoning tasks. Nonetheless, human cognition extends beyond language alone, enabling the remarkable capability to think in both words and images. Inspired by this mechanism, we propose a new reasoning paradigm, Multimodal Visualization-of-Thought (MVoT). It enables visual thinking in MLLMs by generating image visualizations of their reasoning traces. To ensure high-quality visualization, we introduce token discrepancy loss into autoregressive MLLMs. This innovation significantly improves both visual coherence and fidelity. We validate this approach through several dynamic spatial reasoning tasks. Experimental results reveal that MVoT demonstrates competitive performance across tasks. Moreover, it exhibits robust and reliable improvements in the most challenging scenarios where CoT fails. Ultimately, MVoT establishes new possibilities for complex reasoning tasks where visual thinking can effectively complement verbal reasoning.
Chengzu Li, Wenshan Wu, Huanyu Zhang 0002, Yan Xia 0005, Shaoguang Mao, Li Dong 0004, Ivan Vulic, Furu Wei
ICML1
2024 Semantic Map-based Generation of Navigation Instructions
abstract
We are interested in the generation of navigation instructions, either in their own right or as training material for robotic navigation task. In this paper, we propose a new approach to navigation instruction generation by framing the problem as an image captioning task using semantic maps as visual input. Conventional approaches employ a sequence of panorama images to generate navigation instructions. Semantic maps abstract away from visual details and fuse the information in multiple panorama images into a single top-down representation, thereby reducing computational complexity to process the input. We present a benchmark dataset for instruction generation using semantic maps, propose an initial model and ask human subjects to manually assess the quality of generated instructions. Our initial investigations show promise in using semantic maps for instruction generation instead of a sequence of panorama images, but there is vast scope for improvement. We release the code for data preparation and model training at https://github.com/chengzu-li/VLGen.
Chengzu Li, Simone Teufel, Rama Sanand Doddipatla, Svetlana Stoyanchev
LREC/COLING1
2024 TopViewRS: Vision-Language Models as Top-View Spatial Reasoners
abstract
Top-view perspective denotes a typical way in which humans read and reason over different types of maps, and it is vital for localization and navigation of humans as well as of 'non-human' agents, such as the ones backed by large Vision-Language Models (VLMs).Nonetheless, spatial reasoning capabilities of modern VLMs in this setup remain unattested and underexplored.In this work, we study their capability to understand and reason over spatial relations from the top view.The focus on top view also enables controlled evaluations at different granularity of spatial reasoning; we clearly disentangle different abilities (e.g., recognizing particular objects versus understanding their relative positions).We introduce the TOPVIEWRS (Top-View Reasoning in Space) dataset, consisting of 11,384 multiple-choice questions with either realistic or semantic top-view map as visual input.We then use it to study and evaluate VLMs across 4 perception and reasoning tasks with different levels of complexity.Evaluation of 10 representative open-and closedsource VLMs reveals the gap of more than 50% compared to average human performance, and it is even lower than the random baseline in some cases.Although additional experiments show that Chain-of-Thought reasoning can boost model capabilities by 5.82% on average, the overall performance of VLMs remains limited.Our findings underscore the critical need for enhanced model capability in top-view spatial reasoning and set a foundation for further research towards human-level proficiency of VLMs in real-world multimodal tasks.
Chengzu Li, Caiqi Zhang, Han Zhou 0010, Nigel Collier, Anna Korhonen, Ivan Vulic
EMNLP1
2023 Generating Data for Symbolic Language with Large Language Models
abstract
While large language models (LLMs) bring not only performance but also complexity, recent work has started to turn LLMs into data generators rather than task inferencers, where another affordable task model is trained for efficient deployment and inference.However, such an approach has primarily been applied to natural language tasks, and has not yet been explored for symbolic language tasks with complex structured outputs (e.g., semantic parsing and code generation).In this paper, we propose SYMGEN which utilizes LLMs for generating various annotationexpensive symbolic language data.SYMGEN consists of an informative prompt to steer generation and an agreement-based verifier to improve data correctness.We conduct extensive experiments on six symbolic language tasks across various settings.Compared with the LLMs, we demonstrate the 1%-sized task model can achieve comparable or better performance, largely cutting inference and deployment costs.We also show that generated data with only a few human demonstrations can be as effective as over 10 times the amount of human-annotated data when training the task model, saving a considerable amount of annotation effort.SYMGEN takes a step toward data generation for annotation-expensive complex tasks, and we release the code at https://github.com/HKUNLP/SymGen.
Jiacheng Ye, Chengzu Li, Lingpeng Kong, Tao Yu 0009
EMNLP2
2023 Binding Language Models in Symbolic Languages
Zhoujun Cheng, Tianbao Xie, Peng Shi 0010, Chengzu Li, Rahul Nadkarni, Yushi Hu, Caiming Xiong, Dragomir R. Radev, Mari Ostendorf, Luke Zettlemoyer, Noah A. Smith, Tao Yu 0009
ICLR4
2022 UnifiedSKG: Unifying and Multi-Tasking Structured Knowledge Grounding with Text-to-Text Language Models
abstract
Tianbao Xie, Chen Henry Wu, Peng Shi, Ruiqi Zhong, Torsten Scholak, Michihiro Yasunaga, Chien-Sheng Wu, Ming Zhong, Pengcheng Yin, Sida I. Wang, Victor Zhong, Bailin Wang, Chengzu Li, Connor Boyle, Ansong Ni, Ziyu Yao, Dragomir Radev, Caiming Xiong, Lingpeng Kong, Rui Zhang, Noah A. Smith, Luke Zettlemoyer, Tao Yu. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2022.
Tianbao Xie, Chen Henry Wu, Peng Shi 0010, Ruiqi Zhong, Torsten Scholak, Michihiro Yasunaga, Chien-Sheng Wu, Ming Zhong 0005, Sida I. Wang, Victor Zhong, Bailin Wang, Chengzu Li, Connor Boyle, Ansong Ni, Ziyu Yao 0002, Dragomir R. Radev, Caiming Xiong, Lingpeng Kong, Rui Zhang 0037, Noah A. Smith, Luke Zettlemoyer, Tao Yu 0009
EMNLP13