EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Doruk Cakmakci
dblp:311/9215
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-7626-7647ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 81% Medical and health informatics · 19% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metabolomics |
0.8 | 2 | 2023 | Targeted metabolomics analyses for brain tumor margin assessment during surgery · Bioinform. 2022 PiDeeL: metabolic pathway-informed deep learning model for survival analysis and pathological classification of gliomas · Bioinform. 2023 |
Medical and health informatics › biomedical data science
cancer informatics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PiDeeL: metabolic pathway-informed deep learning model for survival analysis and pathological classification of gliomas · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
survival analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PiDeeL: metabolic pathway-informed deep learning model for survival analysis and pathological classification of gliomas · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metabolomics
metabolite quantification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Targeted metabolomics analyses for brain tumor margin assessment during surgery · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural biology
NMR spectroscopy |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Targeted metabolomics analyses for brain tumor margin assessment during surgery · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems bioinformatics › pathway analysis
metabolic pathway analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | PiDeeL: metabolic pathway-informed deep learning model for survival analysis and pathological classification of gliomas · Bioinform. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pathway-informed neural network · 0.7deep learning · 0.7machine learning · 0.6HRMAS NMR spectroscopy · 0.6ERETIC normalization · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | PiDeeL: metabolic pathway-informed deep learning model for survival analysis and pathological classification of gliomasabstractMOTIVATION: Online assessment of tumor characteristics during surgery is important and has the potential to establish an intra-operative surgeon feedback mechanism. With the availability of such feedback, surgeons could decide to be more liberal or conservative regarding the resection of the tumor. While there are methods to perform metabolomics-based tumor pathology prediction, their model complexity predictive performance is limited by the small dataset sizes. Furthermore, the information conveyed by the feedback provided on the tumor tissue could be improved both in terms of content and accuracy. RESULTS: In this study, we propose a metabolic pathway-informed deep learning model (PiDeeL) to perform survival analysis and pathology assessment based on metabolite concentrations. We show that incorporating pathway information into the model architecture substantially reduces parameter complexity and achieves better survival analysis and pathological classification performance. With these design decisions, we show that PiDeeL improves tumor pathology prediction performance of the state-of-the-art in terms of the Area Under the ROC Curve by 3.38% and the Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve by 4.06%. Similarly, with respect to the time-dependent concordance index (c-index), PiDeeL achieves better survival analysis performance (improvement of 4.3%) when compared to the state-of-the-art. Moreover, we show that importance analyses performed on input metabolite features as well as pathway-specific neurons of PiDeeL provide insights into tumor metabolism. We foresee that the use of this model in the surgery room will help surgeons adjust the surgery plan on the fly and will result in better prognosis estimates tailored to surgical procedures. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code is released at https://github.com/ciceklab/PiDeeL. The data used in this study are released at https://zenodo.org/record/7228791. Gun Kaynar, Doruk Cakmakci, Caroline Bund, Julien Todeschi, Izzie Namer, A. Ercüment Çiçek |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2022 | Targeted metabolomics analyses for brain tumor margin assessment during surgeryabstractMOTIVATION: Identification and removal of micro-scale residual tumor tissue during brain tumor surgery are key for survival in glioma patients. For this goal, High-Resolution Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (HRMAS NMR) spectroscopy-based assessment of tumor margins during surgery has been an effective method. However, the time required for metabolite quantification and the need for human experts such as a pathologist to be present during surgery are major bottlenecks of this technique. While machine learning techniques that analyze the NMR spectrum in an untargeted manner (i.e. using the full raw signal) have been shown to effectively automate this feedback mechanism, high dimensional and noisy structure of the NMR signal limits the attained performance. RESULTS: In this study, we show that identifying informative regions in the HRMAS NMR spectrum and using them for tumor margin assessment improves the prediction power. We use the spectra normalized with the ERETIC (electronic reference to access in vivo concentrations) method which uses an external reference signal to calibrate the HRMAS NMR spectrum. We train models to predict quantities of metabolites from annotated regions of this spectrum. Using these predictions for tumor margin assessment provides performance improvements up to 4.6% the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC-ROC) and 2.8% the Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUC-PR). We validate the importance of various tumor biomarkers and identify a novel region between 7.97 ppm and 8.09 ppm as a new candidate for a glioma biomarker. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code is released at https://github.com/ciceklab/targeted_brain_tumor_margin_assessment. The data underlying this article are available in Zenodo, at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5781769. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Doruk Cakmakci, Gun Kaynar, Caroline Bund, Martial Piotto, Francois Proust, Izzie Namer, A. Ercüment Çiçek |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2020 | Machine learning assisted intraoperative assessment of brain tumor margins using HRMAS NMR spectroscopyabstractComplete resection of the tumor is important for survival in glioma patients. Even if the gross total resection was achieved, left-over micro-scale tissue in the excision cavity risks recurrence. High Resolution Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (HRMAS NMR) technique can distinguish healthy and malign tissue efficiently using peak intensities of biomarker metabolites. The method is fast, sensitive and can work with small and unprocessed samples, which makes it a good fit for real-time analysis during surgery. However, only a targeted analysis for the existence of known tumor biomarkers can be made and this requires a technician with chemistry background, and a pathologist with knowledge on tumor metabolism to be present during surgery. Here, we show that we can accurately perform this analysis in real-time and can analyze the full spectrum in an untargeted fashion using machine learning. We work on a new and large HRMAS NMR dataset of glioma and control samples (n = 565), which are also labeled with a quantitative pathology analysis. Our results show that a random forest based approach can distinguish samples with tumor cells and controls accurately and effectively with a median AUC of 85.6% and AUPR of 93.4%. We also show that we can further distinguish benign and malignant samples with a median AUC of 87.1% and AUPR of 96.1%. We analyze the feature (peak) importance for classification to interpret the results of the classifier. We validate that known malignancy biomarkers such as creatine and 2-hydroxyglutarate play an important role in distinguishing tumor and normal cells and suggest new biomarker regions. The code is released at http://github.com/ciceklab/HRMAS_NC. Doruk Cakmakci, Emin Onur Karakaslar, Elisa Ruhland, Marie-Pierre Chenard, Francois Proust, Martial Piotto, Izzie Namer, A. Ercüment Çiçek |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |