Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nazal Mohamed

dblp:311/9921 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › causal inference › causal modeling
causal discovery
0.912025
Federated Granger Causality Learning For Interdependent Clients With State Space Representation · ICLR 2025
Data mining › causal inference › causal modeling › causal discovery
granger causality
0.912025
Federated Granger Causality Learning For Interdependent Clients With State Space Representation · ICLR 2025
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning
federated learning
0.912025
Federated Granger Causality Learning For Interdependent Clients With State Space Representation · ICLR 2025
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.312025
Federated Granger Causality Learning For Interdependent Clients With State Space Representation · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning function · 2.6differential privacy · 2.6state space model · 1.7state-space model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Federated Granger Causality Learning For Interdependent Clients With State Space Representation
abstract
Advanced sensors and IoT devices have improved the monitoring and control of complex industrial enterprises. They have also created an interdependent fabric of geographically distributed process operations (clients) across these enterprises. Granger causality is an effective approach to detect and quantify interdependencies by examining how the state of one client affects the states of others over time. Understanding these interdependencies helps capture how localized events, such as faults and disruptions, can propagate throughout the system, potentially leading to widespread operational impacts. However, the large volume and complexity of industrial data present significant challenges in effectively modeling these interdependencies. This paper develops a federated approach to learning Granger causality. We utilize a linear state space system framework that leverages low-dimensional state estimates to analyze interdependencies. This helps address bandwidth limitations and the computational burden commonly associated with centralized data processing. We propose augmenting the client models with the Granger causality information learned by the server through a Machine Learning (ML) function. We examine the co-dependence between the augmented client and server models and reformulate the framework as a standalone ML algorithm providing conditions for its sublinear and linear convergence rates. We also study the convergence of the framework to a centralized oracle model. Moreover, we include a differential privacy analysis to ensure data security while preserving causal insights. Using synthetic data, we conduct comprehensive experiments to demonstrate the robustness of our approach to perturbations in causality, the scalability to the size of communication, number of clients, and the dimensions of raw data. We also evaluate the performance on two real-world industrial control system datasets by reporting the volume of data saved by decentralization.
Ayush Mohanty, Nazal Mohamed, Paritosh Ramanan, Nagi Gebraeel
ICLR2