Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mark Chin
dblp:312/1928
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
antibody engineering |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Humanization of antibodies using a machine learning approach on large-scale repertoire data · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
antibody humanization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Humanization of antibodies using a machine learning approach on large-scale repertoire data · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction › protein classification
protein sequence classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Humanization of antibodies using a machine learning approach on large-scale repertoire data · Bioinform. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
repertoire data · 0.5machine learning classifier · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Humanization of antibodies using a machine learning approach on large-scale repertoire dataabstractMOTIVATION: Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics are often produced from non-human sources (typically murine), and can therefore generate immunogenic responses in humans. Humanization procedures aim to produce antibody therapeutics that do not elicit an immune response and are safe for human use, without impacting efficacy. Humanization is normally carried out in a largely trial-and-error experimental process. We have built machine learning classifiers that can discriminate between human and non-human antibody variable domain sequences using the large amount of repertoire data now available. RESULTS: Our classifiers consistently outperform the current best-in-class model for distinguishing human from murine sequences, and our output scores exhibit a negative relationship with the experimental immunogenicity of existing antibody therapeutics. We used our classifiers to develop a novel, computational humanization tool, Hu-mAb, that suggests mutations to an input sequence to reduce its immunogenicity. For a set of therapeutic antibodies with known precursor sequences, the mutations suggested by Hu-mAb show substantial overlap with those deduced experimentally. Hu-mAb is therefore an effective replacement for trial-and-error humanization experiments, producing similar results in a fraction of the time. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Hu-mAb (humanness scoring and humanization) is freely available to use at opig.stats.ox.ac.uk/webapps/humab. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Claire Marks, Alissa M. Hummer, Mark Chin, Charlotte M. Deane |
Bioinform. | 3 |