Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hamid Kazemi
dblp:312/6986
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 30% Language models and text generation · 29% Generative modeling · 27% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.8 | 2 | 2024 | Plug-In Inversion: Model-Agnostic Inversion for Vision with Data Augmentations · ICML 2022 Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
machine-generated text detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
memorization mitigation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Be like a Goldfish, Don't Memorize! Mitigating Memorization in Generative LLMs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › open-vocabulary object detection
zero-shot object detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Cold Diffusion: Inverting Arbitrary Image Transforms Without Noise · NeurIPS 2023 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
membership inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Canary in a Coalmine: Better Membership Inference with Ensembled Adversarial Queries · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy › privacy attack
model inversion |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Plug-In Inversion: Model-Agnostic Inversion for Vision with Data Augmentations · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
privacy |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Canary in a Coalmine: Better Membership Inference with Ensembled Adversarial Queries · ICLR 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ensembling · 1.3adversarial queries · 1.3pre-trained language model · 0.8next-token training objective · 0.8goldfish loss · 0.8contrastive language model scoring · 0.8image restoration operator · 0.7denoising · 0.7data augmentation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated TextabstractDetecting text generated by modern large language models is thought to be hard, as both LLMs and humans can exhibit a wide range of complex behaviors. However, we find that a score based on contrasting two closely related language models is highly accurate at separating human-generated and machine-generated text. Based on this mechanism, we propose a novel LLM detector that only requires simple calculations using a pair of pre-trained LLMs. The method, called *Binoculars*, achieves state-of-the-art accuracy without any training data. It is capable of spotting machine text from a range of modern LLMs without any model-specific modifications. We comprehensively evaluate *Binoculars* on a number of text sources and in varied situations. Over a wide range of document types, *Binoculars* detects over 90% of generated samples from ChatGPT (and other LLMs) at a false positive rate of 0.01%, despite not being trained on any ChatGPT data. Code available at https://github.com/ahans30/Binoculars. Abhimanyu Hans, Avi Schwarzschild, Valeriia Cherepanova, Hamid Kazemi, Aniruddha Saha, Micah Goldblum, Jonas Geiping, Tom Goldstein |
ICML | 4 |
| 2024 | Be like a Goldfish, Don't Memorize! Mitigating Memorization in Generative LLMsabstractLarge language models can memorize and repeat their training data, causing privacy and copyright risks. To mitigate memorization, we introduce a subtle modification to the next-token training objective that we call the goldfish loss. During training, a randomly sampled subsets of tokens are excluded from the loss computation. These dropped tokens are not memorized by the model, which prevents verbatim reproduction of a complete chain of tokens from the training set. We run extensive experiments training billion-scale LLaMA-2 models, both pre-trained and trained from scratch, and demonstrate significant reductions in extractable memorization with little to no impact on downstream benchmarks.
_Code and checkpoints: https://github.com/ahans30/goldfish-loss_ Abhimanyu Hans, John Kirchenbauer, Yuxin Wen, Neel Jain, Hamid Kazemi, Prajwal Singhania, Gowthami Somepalli, Jonas Geiping, Abhinav Bhatele, Tom Goldstein |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2023 | Canary in a Coalmine: Better Membership Inference with Ensembled Adversarial Queries
Yuxin Wen, Arpit Bansal, Hamid Kazemi, Eitan Borgnia, Micah Goldblum, Jonas Geiping, Tom Goldstein |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | Cold Diffusion: Inverting Arbitrary Image Transforms Without NoiseabstractStandard diffusion models involve an image transform -- adding Gaussian noise -- and an image restoration operator that inverts this degradation. We observe that the generative behavior of diffusion models is not strongly dependent on the choice of image degradation, and in fact, an entire family of generative models can be constructed by varying this choice. Even when using completely deterministic degradations (e.g., blur, masking, and more), the training and test-time update rules that underlie diffusion models can be easily generalized to create generative models.
The success of these fully deterministic models calls into question the community's understanding of diffusion models, which relies on noise in either gradient Langevin dynamics or variational inference and paves the way for generalized diffusion models that invert arbitrary processes. Arpit Bansal, Eitan Borgnia, Hong-Min Chu, Jie S. Li 0001, Hamid Kazemi, Furong Huang, Micah Goldblum, Jonas Geiping, Tom Goldstein |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2022 | Plug-In Inversion: Model-Agnostic Inversion for Vision with Data AugmentationsabstractExisting techniques for model inversion typically rely on hard-to-tune regularizers, such as total variation or feature regularization, which must be individually calibrated for each network in order to produce adequate images. In this work, we introduce Plug-In Inversion, which relies on a simple set of augmentations and does not require excessive hyper-parameter tuning. Under our proposed augmentation-based scheme, the same set of augmentation hyper-parameters can be used for inverting a wide range of image classification models, regardless of input dimensions or the architecture. We illustrate the practicality of our approach by inverting Vision Transformers (ViTs) and Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) trained on the ImageNet dataset, tasks which to the best of our knowledge have not been successfully accomplished by any previous works. Amin Ghiasi, Hamid Kazemi, Steven Reich, Chen Zhu 0001, Micah Goldblum, Tom Goldstein |
ICML | 2 |