Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sakrapee Paisalnan

dblp:312/9580 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-2600-1824ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
user interaction
1.012026
Predicting Expectancy Violations Using Eye-Tracking Features: A Machine Learning Approach · WWW 2026
Information retrieval
web search
0.312026
Predicting Expectancy Violations Using Eye-Tracking Features: A Machine Learning Approach · WWW 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 1.0leave-one-participant-out cross-validation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Predicting Expectancy Violations Using Eye-Tracking Features: A Machine Learning Approach
abstract
Web searchers continuously form expectations about document content based on snippets and titles, yet when these expectations are violated, their attention and satisfaction are disrupted. Detecting such expectancy violations in real-time can enable adaptive, user-aware Web systems that respond to cognitive mismatches. This paper investigates whether eye-tracking features can predict expectancy violations during Web search and identifies which temporal aspects of attention carry predictive information. Using data from 34 participants performing controlled search tasks, we extracted four gaze metrics, i.e. time to first fixation, total fixation duration, number of fixations, and mean fixation duration, and trained machine learning models using a leave-one-participant-out cross-validation approach. Sustained attention features, particularly total fixation duration and number of fixations, predicted expectancy violations with 62.6% accuracy (p = .008), while initial attention metrics performed at chance. The results reveal that expectancy violations manifest through extended visual engagement rather than immediate orienting responses. The findings of this work contribute to the theoretical understanding of user–system interaction on the Web and provide a foundation for adaptive retrieval interfaces capable of detecting cognitive surprise and delivering timely support.
Sakrapee Paisalnan, Yashar Moshfeghi
WWW1