Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adrien Vandenbroucque

dblp:313/1631 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › bayesian learning theory
bayes risk bounds
0.812024
Lower Bounds on the Bayesian Risk via Information Measures · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › information-theoretic analysis
information-theoretic bounds
0.812024
Lower Bounds on the Bayesian Risk via Information Measures · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory
0.812024
Lower Bounds on the Bayesian Risk via Information Measures · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Information theory › information measures
divergence measures
0.812024
Lower Bounds on the Bayesian Risk via Information Measures · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Information theory › information measures › divergence measures
rényi divergence
0.812024
Lower Bounds on the Bayesian Risk via Information Measures · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

data processing inequality · 1.5bayesian risk · 1.5information measures · 0.8information measure · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 A Finite-Sample Strong Converse for Binary Hypothesis Testing via (Reverse) Rényi Divergence
abstract
This work investigates binary hypothesis testing between $H_0\sim P_0$ and $H_1\sim P_1$ in the finite-sample regime under asymmetric error constraints. By employing the ``reverse" Rényi divergence, we derive novel non-asymptotic bounds on the Type II error probability which naturally establish a strong converse result. Furthermore, when the Type I error is constrained to decay exponentially with a rate $c$, we show that the Type II error converges to 1 exponentially fast if $c$ exceeds the Kullback-Leibler divergence $D(P_1\|P_0)$, and vanishes exponentially fast if $c$ is smaller. Finally, we present numerical examples demonstrating that the proposed converse bounds strictly improve upon existing finite-sample results in the literature.
Roberto Bruno 0002, Adrien Vandenbroucque, Amedeo Roberto Esposito
ISIT2
2026 Contraction of Rényi Divergences for Discrete Channels: Properties and Applications
abstract
This work explores properties of Strong Data-Processing constants for Rényi Divergences. Parallels are made with the well-studied $φ$-Divergences, and it is shown that the order $α$ of Rényi Divergences dictates whether certain properties of the contraction of $φ$-Divergences are mirrored or not. In particular, we demonstrate that when $α>1$, the contraction properties can deviate quite strikingly from those of $φ$-Divergences. We also uncover specific characteristics of contraction for the $\infty$-Rényi Divergence and relate it to $\varepsilon$-Local Differential Privacy. The results are then applied to bound the speed of convergence of Markov chains, where we argue that the contraction of Rényi Divergences offers a new perspective on the contraction of $L^α$-norms commonly studied in the literature.
Adrien Vandenbroucque, Amedeo Roberto Esposito, Michael Gastpar
ISIT1
2024 Analysis of Bootstrap and Subsampling in High-dimensional Regularized Regression
abstract
We investigate popular resampling methods for estimating the uncertainty of statistical models, such as subsampling, bootstrap and the jackknife, and their performance in high-dimensional supervised regression tasks. We provide a tight asymptotic description of the biases and variances estimated by these methods in the context of generalized linear models, such as ridge and logistic regression, taking the limit where the number of samples $n$ and dimension $d$ of the covariates grow at a comparable rate: $\alpha=n/d$ fixed. Our findings are three-fold: i) resampling methods are fraught with problems in high dimensions and exhibit the double-descent-like behavior typical of these situations; ii) only when $\alpha$ is large enough do they provide consistent and reliable error estimations (we give convergence rates); iii) in the over-parametrized regime $\alpha<1$ relevant to modern machine learning practice, their predictions are not consistent, even with optimal regularization.
Lucas Clarté, Adrien Vandenbroucque, Guillaume Dalle, Bruno Loureiro, Florent Krzakala, Lenka Zdeborová
UAI2
2024 Lower Bounds on the Bayesian Risk via Information Measures
abstract
This paper focuses on parameter estimation and introduces a new method for lower bounding the Bayesian risk. The method allows for the use of virtually any information measure, including Rényi's $\alpha$, $\varphi$-divergences, and Sibson's $\alpha$-Mutual Information. The approach considers divergences as functionals of measures and exploits the duality between spaces of measures and spaces of functions. In particular, we show that one can lower bound the risk with any information measure by upper bounding its dual via Markov's inequality. We are thus able to provide estimator-independent impossibility results thanks to the Data-Processing Inequalities that divergences satisfy. The results are then applied to settings of interest involving both discrete and continuous parameters, including the “Hide-and-Seek” problem, and compared to the state-of-the-art techniques. An important observation is that the behaviour of the lower bound in the number of samples is influenced by the choice of the information measure. We leverage this by introducing a new divergence inspired by the “Hockey-Stick” divergence, which is demonstrated empirically to provide the largest lower bound across all considered settings. If the observations are subject to privatisation, stronger impossibility results can be obtained via Strong Data-Processing Inequalities. The paper also discusses some generalisations and alternative directions.
Amedeo Roberto Esposito, Adrien Vandenbroucque, Michael Gastpar
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2022 On Sibson's α-Mutual Information
abstract
We explore a family of information measures that stems from Rényi’s α-Divergences with α < 0. In particular, we extend the definition of Sibson’s α-Mutual Information to negative values of α and show several properties of these objects. Moreover, we highlight how this family of information measures is related to functional inequalities that can be employed in a variety of fields, including lower-bounds on the Risk in Bayesian Estimation Procedures.
Amedeo Roberto Esposito, Adrien Vandenbroucque, Michael Gastpar
ISIT2
2022 Lower-bounds on the Bayesian Risk in Estimation Procedures via f-Divergences
abstract
We consider the problem of parameter estimation in a Bayesian setting and propose a general lower-bound that includes part of the family of f-Divergences. The results are then applied to specific settings of interest and compared to other notable results in the literature. In particular, we show that the known bounds using Mutual Information can be improved by using, for example, Maximal Leakage, Hellinger divergence, or generalizations of the Hockey-Stick divergence.
Adrien Vandenbroucque, Amedeo Roberto Esposito, Michael Gastpar
ISIT1