EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ege Berkay Gulcan
dblp:313/1679
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1237-0829ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 67% Electronic design automation · 33% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Logic in computer science · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems
consensus |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Model-Guided Fuzzing of Distributed Systems · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
coverage-guided fuzzing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Model-Guided Fuzzing of Distributed Systems · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Distributed systems
distributed system testing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Model-Guided Fuzzing of Distributed Systems · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Software testing
concurrency testing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generalized Concurrency Testing Tool for Distributed Systems · ISSTA 2024 |
Software testing › system testing
distributed system testing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generalized Concurrency Testing Tool for Distributed Systems · ISSTA 2024 |
Logic in computer science › temporal logic
TLA+ |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Model-Guided Fuzzing of Distributed Systems · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random test generation · 1.7coverage-guided fuzzing · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Model-Guided Fuzzing of Distributed SystemsabstractWe present a coverage-guided testing algorithm for distributed systems implementations. Our main innovation is the use of an abstract formal model of the system that is used to define coverage. Such abstract models are frequently developed in the early phases of protocol design and verification but are infrequently used at testing time. We show that guiding random test generation using model coverage can be effective in covering interesting points in the implementation state space. We have implemented a fuzzer for distributed system implementations and abstract models written in TLA+. Our algorithm achieves better coverage over purely random exploration as well as random exploration guided by different notions of scheduler coverage and mutation. In particular, we show consistently higher coverage on implementations of distributed consensus protocols such as Two-Phase Commit and the Raft implementations in Etcd-raft and RedisRaft and detect bugs faster. Moreover, we discovered 12 previously unknown bugs in their implementations, four of which could only be detected by model-guided fuzzing. Ege Berkay Gulcan, Burcu Kulahcioglu Ozkan, Rupak Majumdar, Srinidhi Nagendra |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 1 |
| 2024 | Generalized Concurrency Testing Tool for Distributed Systems
Ege Berkay Gulcan, João Neto 0001, Burcu Kulahcioglu Ozkan |
ISSTA | 1 |
| 2022 | Binary Transformation Method for Multi-Label Stream ClassificationabstractData streams produce extensive data with high throughput from various domains and require copious amounts of computational resources and energy. Many data streams are generated as multi-labeled and classifying this data is computationally demanding. Some of the most well-known methods for Multi-Label Stream Classification are Problem Transformation schemes; however, previous work on this area does not satisfy the efficiency demands of multi-label data streams. In this study, we propose a novel Problem Transformation method for Multi-Label Stream Classification called Binary Transformation, which utilizes regression algorithms by transforming the labels into a continuous value. We compare our method against three of the leading problem transformation methods using eight datasets. Our results show that Binary Transformation achieves statistically similar effectiveness and provides a much higher level of efficiency. Ege Berkay Gulcan, Isin Su Ecevit, Fazli Can |
CIKM | 1 |