EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Omer Ronen
dblp:313/2456
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 49% Optimization for machine learning · 25% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 16% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
black-box optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mitigating over-Exploration in Latent Space Optimization using les · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
latent space optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mitigating over-Exploration in Latent Space Optimization using les · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mitigating over-Exploration in Latent Space Optimization using les · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
tree-based models |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Hierarchical Shrinkage: Improving the accuracy and interpretability of tree-based models · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Hierarchical Shrinkage: Improving the accuracy and interpretability of tree-based models · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
shapley value |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Hierarchical Shrinkage: Improving the accuracy and interpretability of tree-based models · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
out-of-distribution detection · 0.9latent exploration score · 0.9ridge regression · 0.6post-hoc regularization · 0.6hierarchical shrinkage · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mitigating over-Exploration in Latent Space Optimization using lesabstractWe develop Latent Exploration Score (LES) to mitigate over-exploration in Latent Space Optimization (LSO), a popular method for solving black-box discrete optimization problems. LSO utilizes continuous optimization within the latent space of a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) and is known to be susceptible to over-exploration, which manifests in unrealistic solutions that reduce its practicality. LES leverages the trained decoder’s approximation of the data distribution, and can be employed with any VAE decoder–including pretrained ones–without additional training, architectural changes or access to the training data. Our evaluation across five LSO benchmark tasks and twenty-two VAE models demonstrates that LES always enhances the quality of the solutions while maintaining high objective values, leading to improvements over existing solutions in most cases. We believe that new avenues to LSO will be opened by LES’ ability to identify out of distribution areas, differentiability, and computational tractability. Omer Ronen, Ahmed Imtiaz Humayun, Richard G. Baraniuk, Randall Balestriero, Bin Yu 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Hierarchical Shrinkage: Improving the accuracy and interpretability of tree-based modelsabstractDecision trees and random forests (RF) are a cornerstone of modern machine learning practice. Due to their tendency to overfit, trees are typically regularized by a variety of techniques that modify their structure (e.g. pruning). We introduce Hierarchical Shrinkage (HS), a post-hoc algorithm which regularizes the tree not by altering its structure, but by shrinking the prediction over each leaf toward the sample means over each of its ancestors, with weights depending on a single regularization parameter and the number of samples in each ancestor. Since HS is a post-hoc method, it is extremely fast, compatible with any tree-growing algorithm and can be used synergistically with other regularization techniques. Extensive experiments over a wide variety of real-world datasets show that HS substantially increases the predictive performance of decision trees even when used in conjunction with other regularization techniques. Moreover, we find that applying HS to individual trees in a RF often improves its accuracy and interpretability by simplifying and stabilizing decision boundaries and SHAP values. We further explain HS by showing that it to be equivalent to ridge regression on a basis that is constructed of decision stumps associated to the internal nodes of a tree. All code and models are released in a full-fledged package available on Github Abhineet Agarwal, Yan Shuo Tan, Omer Ronen, Chandan Singh, Bin Yu 0001 |
ICML | 3 |