Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Felix Stollenwerk

dblp:313/2512 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 44% Language models and text generation · 35% Representation and self-supervised learning · 22%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adam variants
0.912025
Better Embeddings with Coupled Adam · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization
optimizer design
0.912025
Better Embeddings with Coupled Adam · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › dataset refinement
pretraining data filtering
0.912025
Judging Quality Across Languages: A Multilingual Approach to Pretraining Data Filtering with Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding
0.912025
Better Embeddings with Coupled Adam · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model training
0.312025
Better Embeddings with Coupled Adam · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models
0.312025
Judging Quality Across Languages: A Multilingual Approach to Pretraining Data Filtering with Language Models · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

second moment estimation · 0.9coupled adam · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Better Embeddings with Coupled Adam
abstract
Despite their remarkable capabilities, LLMs learn word representations that exhibit the undesirable yet poorly understood feature of anisotropy.In this paper, we argue that the second moment in Adam is a cause of anisotropic embeddings, and suggest a modified optimizer called Coupled Adam to mitigate the problem.Our experiments demonstrate that Coupled Adam significantly improves the quality of embeddings, while also leading to better upstream and downstream performance on large enough datasets.
Felix Stollenwerk, Tobias Stollenwerk
ACL (1)1
2025 Judging Quality Across Languages: A Multilingual Approach to Pretraining Data Filtering with Language Models
abstract
Mehdi Ali, Manuel Brack, Max Lübbering, Elias Wendt, Abbas Goher Khan, Richard Rutmann, Alex Jude, Maurice Kraus, Alexander Arno Weber, Felix Stollenwerk, David Kaczér, Florian Mai, Lucie Flek, Rafet Sifa, Nicolas Flores-Herr, Joachim Koehler, Patrick Schramowski, Michael Fromm, Kristian Kersting. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Mehdi Ali, Manuel Brack, Max Lübbering, Elias Wendt, Abbas Goher Khan, Richard Rutmann, Alex Jude, Maurice Kraus, Alexander Arno Weber, Felix Stollenwerk, David Kaczér, Florian Mai, Lucie Flek, Rafet Sifa, Nicolas Flores-Herr, Joachim Köhler, Patrick Schramowski, Michael Fromm 0001, Kristian Kersting
EMNLP10
2024 GPT-SW3: An Autoregressive Language Model for the Scandinavian Languages
abstract
This paper details the process of developing the first native large generative language model for the North Germanic languages, GPT-SW3. We cover all parts of the development process, from data collection and processing, training configuration and instruction finetuning, to evaluation, applications, and considerations for release strategies. We discuss pros and cons of developing large language models for smaller languages and in relatively peripheral regions of the globe, and we hope that this paper can serve as a guide and reference for other researchers that undertake the development of large generative models for smaller languages.
Ariel Ekgren, Amaru Cuba Gyllensten, Felix Stollenwerk, Joey Öhman, Tim Isbister, Evangelia Gogoulou, Fredrik Carlsson, Judit Casademont, Magnus Sahlgren
LREC/COLING3