Static feature-based Android malware detection using machine learning (ML) remains critical due to its scalability and efficiency. However, existing approaches often overlook security-critical reproducibility concerns, such as dataset duplication, inadequate hyperparameter tuning, and variance from random initialization. This can significantly compromise the practical effectiveness of these systems. In this paper, we systematically investigate these challenges by proposing a more rigorous methodology for model selection and evaluation. Using two widely used datasets, Drebin and APIGraph, we evaluate six ML models of varying complexity under both offline and continuous active learning settings. Our analysis demonstrates that, contrary to popular belief, well-tuned, simpler models, particularly tree-based methods like XGBoost, consistently outperform more complex neural networks, especially when duplicates are removed. To promote transparency and reproducibility, we open-source our codebase, which is extensible for integrating new models and datasets, facilitating reproducible security research.

Interpreting deep neural networks through concept-based explanations offers a bridge between low-level features and high-level human-understandable semantics. However, existing automatic concept discovery methods often fail to align these extracted concepts with the model’s true decision-making process, thereby compromising explanation faithfulness. In this work, we propose FACE (Faithful Automatic Concept Extraction), a novel framework that combines Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) with a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence regularization term to ensure alignment between the model’s original and concept-based predictions. Unlike prior methods that operate solely on encoder activations, FACE incorporates classifier supervision during concept learning, enforcing predictive consistency and enabling faithful explanations. We provide theoretical guarantees showing that minimizing the KL divergence bounds the deviation in predictive distributions, thereby promoting faithful local linearity in the learned concept space. Systematic evaluations on ImageNet, COCO, and CelebA datasets demonstrate that FACE outperforms existing methods across faithfulness and sparsity metrics.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in cybersecurity applications but have also caused lower confidence due to problems like hallucinations and a lack of truthfulness. Existing benchmarks provide general evaluations but do not sufficiently address the practical and applied aspects of LLM performance in cybersecurity-specific tasks. To address this gap, we introduce the SECURE (Security Extraction, Understanding & Reasoning Evaluation), a benchmark designed to assess LLMs performance in realistic cybersecurity scenarios. SECURE includes six datasets focused on the Industrial Control System sector to evaluate knowledge extraction, understanding, and reasoning based on industry-standard sources. Our study evaluates seven state-of-the-art models on these tasks, providing insights into their strengths and weaknesses in cybersecurity contexts. We also offer recommendations for improving LLMs reliability as cyber advisory tools and release our benchmark datasets and framework for community use at https://github.com/aiforsec/SECURE.

Deep neural networks for classification are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where small perturbations to input samples lead to incorrect predictions. This susceptibility, combined with the black-box nature of such networks, limits their adoption in critical applications like autonomous driving. Feature-attribution-based explanation methods provide relevance of input features for model predictions on input samples, thus explaining model decisions. However, we observe that both model predictions and feature attributions for input samples are sensitive to noise. We develop a practical method for this characteristic of model prediction and feature attribution to detect adversarial samples. Our method, PASA, requires the computation of two test statistics using model prediction and feature attribution and can reliably detect adversarial samples using thresholds learned from benign samples. We validate our lightweight approach by evaluating the performance of PASA on varying strengths of FGSM, PGD, BIM, and CW attacks on multiple image and non-image datasets. On average, we outperform state-of-the-art statistical unsupervised adversarial detectors on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet by 14% and 35% ROC-AUC scores, respectively. Moreover, our approach demonstrates competitive performance even when an adversary is aware of the defense mechanism.

Cybersecurity in recent years has gained significant attention, especially with the deployment of millions of devices across the globe and increased threats targeted toward embedded systems. Many cyber threats have been detected and emerged in the last few years. Among multiple threats, malware attacks are considered to be prominent due to the impact on users and systems. Considering the evolving trend of such cyber threats, traditional statistical and heuristic threat detection approaches have observed the need to be more effective and efficient. Machine learning (ML)-based cyber-threat detection has been actively researched and adopted across academia and industry to address the challenges of evolving cyber threats. However, ML-based neural network techniques though efficient, are considered black boxes due to the lack of sufficient information that can be used to deduce their functionality. On the other hand, the interpretable and explainable AI/ML field focuses on the explainability and reason for the decisions performed by the ML models. In this paper, we experiment with different explainable AI (XAI) techniques for interpreting multiple malware detection models. Specifically, we analyze the consistency and reliability of these neural network models in determining an attack and benign functions. We provide quantitative analysis of multiple explanation methods across different datasets. When trained with the top feature attributes (10%-35% of whole data) generated by XAI methods, the ML classifiers (trained on High Performance Counters and Mimicus PDF malware datasets) retain a malware detection accuracy of 88%-92%. The ML classifiers are also compared with state-of-the-art models and the proposed technique (training with partial data features generated by explainable methods) produce comparable malware detection accuracy above 82%.

Cyber threat intelligence (CTI) is crucial in today's cybersecurity landscape, providing essential insights to understand and mitigate the ever-evolving cyber threats. The recent rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown potential in this domain, but concerns about their reliability, accuracy, and hallucinations persist. While existing benchmarks provide general evaluations of LLMs, there are no benchmarks that address the practical and applied aspects of CTI-specific tasks. To bridge this gap, we introduce CTIBench, a benchmark designed to assess LLMs' performance in CTI applications. CTIBench includes multiple datasets focused on evaluating knowledge acquired by LLMs in the cyber-threat landscape. Our evaluation of several state-of-the-art models on these tasks provides insights into their strengths and weaknesses in CTI contexts, contributing to a better understanding of LLM capabilities in CTI.

Interpretability, trustworthiness, and usability are key considerations in high-stake security applications, especially when utilizing deep learning models. While these models are known for their high accuracy, they behave as black boxes in which identifying important features and factors that led to a classification or a prediction is difficult. This can lead to uncertainty and distrust, especially when an incorrect prediction results in severe consequences. Thus, explanation methods aim to provide insights into the inner working of deep learning models. However, most explanation methods provide inconsistent explanations, have low fidelity, and are susceptible to adversarial manipulation, which can reduce model trustworthiness. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of explainable methods and demonstrates their efficacy in three distinct security applications: anomaly detection using system logs, malware prediction, and detection of adversarial images. Our quantitative and qualitative analysis1 reveals serious limitations and concerns in state-of-the-art explanation methods in all three applications. We show that explanation methods for security applications necessitate distinct characteristics, such as stability, fidelity, robustness, and usability, among others, which we outline as the prerequisites for trustworthy explanation methods.

Public and commercial organizations extensively share cyberthreat intelligence (CTI) to prepare systems to defend against existing and emerging cyberattacks. However, traditional CTI has primarily focused on tracking known threat indicators such as IP addresses and domain names, which may not provide long-term value in defending against evolving attacks. To address this challenge, we propose to use more robust threat intelligence signals called attack patterns. LADDER is a knowledge extraction framework that can extract text-based attack patterns from CTI reports at scale. The framework characterizes attack patterns by capturing the phases of an attack in Android and enterprise networks and systematically maps them to the MITRE ATT&CK pattern framework. LADDER can be used by security analysts to determine the presence of attack vectors related to existing and emerging threats, enabling them to prepare defenses proactively. We also present several use cases to demonstrate the application of LADDER in real-world scenarios. Finally, we provide a new, open-access benchmark malware dataset to train future cyberthreat intelligence models.