Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jack Gaither

dblp:313/2610 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 62% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 19% Memory systems · 19%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
High-performance computing › scientific computing systems
X-ray CT reconstruction
0.612022
Critique of "MemXCT: Memory-Centric X-Ray CT Reconstruction With Massive Parallelization" by SCC Team From the University of Texas at Austin · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2022
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU computing
0.212022
Critique of "MemXCT: Memory-Centric X-Ray CT Reconstruction With Massive Parallelization" by SCC Team From the University of Texas at Austin · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2022
Memory systems › processing-in-memory
memory-centric computing
0.212022
Critique of "MemXCT: Memory-Centric X-Ray CT Reconstruction With Massive Parallelization" by SCC Team From the University of Texas at Austin · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cloud computing · 0.6benchmarking · 0.6CUDA · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Critique of "MemXCT: Memory-Centric X-Ray CT Reconstruction With Massive Parallelization" by SCC Team From the University of Texas at Austin
abstract
This report describes The University of Texas Student Cluster Competition team’s effort to reproduce the results of “MemXCT: memory-centric X-ray CT reconstruction with massive parallelization” (Hidayetoğluet al., 2019). The article details a new memory-centric approach that reconstructs X-ray computed tomography (XCT) from noisy raw data. In our reproduction experiments, we utilized Microsoft Azure’s CycleCloud tool to provision, orchestrate, and manage our computing cluster in the cloud. In particular, we scheduled and benchmarked reconstruction workloads using Azure’s CPU-based HC44rs and GPU-based NC12s v2 virtual machine (VM) types to evaluate the scalability properties of the reconstruction approach and the performance differences between architectures. The HC44rs VMs contained 44 Intel Xeon Platinum cores, while the NC12s v2 VM was equipped with two NVIDIA P100 GPUs. We used a recent version of Intel’s compiler stack with the MKL library for our CPU code along with CUDA 11.1 on GPUs. Overall, our results confirm the findings of the original article, demonstrating similar acceleration on GPUs and scalability properties on CPUs. Digital artifacts from these experiments are available at: 10.5281/zenodo.5598108
Brock Davis, Juan Paez, Jack Gaither, Joe A. Garcia
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.3