Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gabe Schoenbach

dblp:313/2972 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-4300-0356ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 56% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 28% Approximation and online algorithms · 8%
Network and information security
1 paper
Digital forensics and information hiding · 50% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 50%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
average-case complexity
1.012026
Optimal Hardness of Online Algorithms for Large Common Induced Subgraphs · COLT 2026
Computational complexity › average-case complexity
overlap gap property
1.012026
Optimal Hardness of Online Algorithms for Large Common Induced Subgraphs · COLT 2026
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking › generative model watermarking
language model watermarking
0.912025
Watermarking Language Models for Many Adaptive Users · SP 2025
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
greedy algorithm
0.312026
Optimal Hardness of Online Algorithms for Large Common Induced Subgraphs · COLT 2026
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms
0.312026
Optimal Hardness of Online Algorithms for Large Common Induced Subgraphs · COLT 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
machine-generated text detection
0.312025
Watermarking Language Models for Many Adaptive Users · SP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

zero-bit watermarking reduction · 1.7AEB-robustness · 1.7overlap gap property · 1.0interpolation argument · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Optimal Hardness of Online Algorithms for Large Common Induced Subgraphs
abstract
We study the problem of efficiently finding large common induced subgraphs of two independent Erdős–Rényi random graphs $G_1, G_2 \sim \mathbb{G}(n,1/2)$. Recently, Chatterjee and Diaconis (2023) showed that the largest common induced subgraph of $G_1$ and $G_2$ has size $(4-o(1))\log_2 n$ with high probability. We first show that a simple greedy online algorithm finds a common induced subgraph of $G_1$ and $G_2$ of size $(2-o(1)) \log_2 n$ with high probability. Our main result shows that no online algorithm can find a common induced subgraph of $G_1$ and $G_2$ of size at least $(2+\varepsilon) \log_2 n$ with probability bounded away from $0$ as $n \to \infty$. Together, these results provide evidence that this problem exhibits a computation-to-optimization gap. To prove the impossibility result, we show that the solution space of the problem exhibits a version of the (multi) overlap gap property (OGP), and utilize an interpolation argument recently developed by Gamarnik, K{ı}z{ı}ldağ, and Warnke (2025) that connects OGP and online algorithms.
David Gamarnik, Miklós Z. Rácz, Gabe Schoenbach
COLT3
2025 Watermarking Language Models for Many Adaptive Users
abstract
We study watermarking schemes for language models with provable guarantees. As we show, prior works offer no robustness guarantees against adaptive prompting: when a user queries a language model more than once, as even benign users do. And with just a single exception [1], prior works are restricted to zero-bit watermarking: machine-generated text can be detected as such, but no additional information can be extracted from the watermark. Unfortunately, merely detecting AI-generated text may not prevent future abuses. We introduce multi-user watermarks, which allow tracing model-generated text to individual users or to groups of colluding users, even in the face of adaptive prompting. We construct multi-user watermarking schemes from undetectable, adaptively robust, zero-bit watermarking schemes (and prove that the undetectable zero-bit scheme of [2] is adaptively robust). Importantly, our scheme provides both zero-bit and multi-user assurances at the same time. It detects shorter snippets just as well as the original scheme, and traces longer excerpts to individuals. The main technical component is a construction of message-embedding watermarks from zero-bit watermarks. Ours is the first generic reduction between watermarking schemes for language models. A challenge for such reductions is the lack of a unified abstraction for robustness - that marked text is detectable even after edits. We introduce a new unifying abstraction called AEB-robustness. AEB-robustness provides that the watermark is detectable whenever the edited text “approximates enough blocks” of model-generated output.
Aloni Cohen, Alexander Hoover 0001, Gabe Schoenbach
SP3