Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gabe Schoenbach
dblp:313/2972
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-4300-0356ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 56% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 28% Approximation and online algorithms · 8% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 50% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity
average-case complexity |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Optimal Hardness of Online Algorithms for Large Common Induced Subgraphs · COLT 2026 |
Computational complexity › average-case complexity
overlap gap property |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Optimal Hardness of Online Algorithms for Large Common Induced Subgraphs · COLT 2026 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking › generative model watermarking
language model watermarking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Watermarking Language Models for Many Adaptive Users · SP 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
greedy algorithm |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Optimal Hardness of Online Algorithms for Large Common Induced Subgraphs · COLT 2026 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Optimal Hardness of Online Algorithms for Large Common Induced Subgraphs · COLT 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
machine-generated text detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Watermarking Language Models for Many Adaptive Users · SP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
zero-bit watermarking reduction · 1.7AEB-robustness · 1.7overlap gap property · 1.0interpolation argument · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Optimal Hardness of Online Algorithms for Large Common Induced SubgraphsabstractWe study the problem of efficiently finding large common induced subgraphs of two independent Erdős–Rényi random graphs $G_1, G_2 \sim \mathbb{G}(n,1/2)$. Recently, Chatterjee and Diaconis (2023) showed that the largest common induced subgraph of $G_1$ and $G_2$ has size $(4-o(1))\log_2 n$ with high probability. We first show that a simple greedy online algorithm finds a common induced subgraph of $G_1$ and $G_2$ of size $(2-o(1)) \log_2 n$ with high probability. Our main result shows that no online algorithm can find a common induced subgraph of $G_1$ and $G_2$ of size at least $(2+\varepsilon) \log_2 n$ with probability bounded away from $0$ as $n \to \infty$. Together, these results provide evidence that this problem exhibits a computation-to-optimization gap. To prove the impossibility result, we show that the solution space of the problem exhibits a version of the (multi) overlap gap property (OGP), and utilize an interpolation argument recently developed by Gamarnik, K{ı}z{ı}ldağ, and Warnke (2025) that connects OGP and online algorithms. David Gamarnik, Miklós Z. Rácz, Gabe Schoenbach |
COLT | 3 |
| 2025 | Watermarking Language Models for Many Adaptive UsersabstractWe study watermarking schemes for language models with provable guarantees. As we show, prior works offer no robustness guarantees against adaptive prompting: when a user queries a language model more than once, as even benign users do. And with just a single exception [1], prior works are restricted to zero-bit watermarking: machine-generated text can be detected as such, but no additional information can be extracted from the watermark. Unfortunately, merely detecting AI-generated text may not prevent future abuses. We introduce multi-user watermarks, which allow tracing model-generated text to individual users or to groups of colluding users, even in the face of adaptive prompting. We construct multi-user watermarking schemes from undetectable, adaptively robust, zero-bit watermarking schemes (and prove that the undetectable zero-bit scheme of [2] is adaptively robust). Importantly, our scheme provides both zero-bit and multi-user assurances at the same time. It detects shorter snippets just as well as the original scheme, and traces longer excerpts to individuals. The main technical component is a construction of message-embedding watermarks from zero-bit watermarks. Ours is the first generic reduction between watermarking schemes for language models. A challenge for such reductions is the lack of a unified abstraction for robustness - that marked text is detectable even after edits. We introduce a new unifying abstraction called AEB-robustness. AEB-robustness provides that the watermark is detectable whenever the edited text “approximates enough blocks” of model-generated output. Aloni Cohen, Alexander Hoover 0001, Gabe Schoenbach |
SP | 3 |