Yilin Miao

dblp:313/7460 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-9024-3019ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 33% Autonomous driving · 33% Motion planning and robot control · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.812024
Model-based Reinforcement Learning for Parameterized Action Spaces · ICML 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › model predictive control
model predictive path integral control
0.812024
Model-based Reinforcement Learning for Parameterized Action Spaces · ICML 2024
Robotics › Autonomous driving
planning and control
0.812024
Model-based Reinforcement Learning for Parameterized Action Spaces · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model predictive path integral · 0.8lipschitz continuity analysis · 0.8dynamics learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Adaptive feature enhancement and distribution smoothing for improved few-shot image classification
Yilin Miao, Yuhong Tang, Jianjun Li 0004, Huangliang Ren
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.1
2024 Model-based Reinforcement Learning for Parameterized Action Spaces
abstract
We propose a novel model-based reinforcement learning algorithm---Dynamics Learning and predictive control with Parameterized Actions (DLPA)---for Parameterized Action Markov Decision Processes (PAMDPs). The agent learns a parameterized-action-conditioned dynamics model and plans with a modified Model Predictive Path Integral control. We theoretically quantify the difference between the generated trajectory and the optimal trajectory during planning in terms of the value they achieved through the lens of Lipschitz Continuity. Our empirical results on several standard benchmarks show that our algorithm achieves superior sample efficiency and asymptotic performance than state-of-the-art PAMDP methods.
Renhao Zhang, Haotian Fu, Yilin Miao, George Dimitri Konidaris
ICML3