EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eitan-Hai Mashiah
dblp:313/9127
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › simple mechanisms
posted-price mechanism |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Revenue Maximization Using Posted Prices for Stochastic Strategic Patient Buyers · AAAI 2023 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
revenue maximization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Revenue Maximization Using Posted Prices for Stochastic Strategic Patient Buyers · AAAI 2023 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › stackelberg game
stackelberg equilibrium |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Revenue Maximization Using Posted Prices for Stochastic Strategic Patient Buyers · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory › VC theory
fat-shattering dimension |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Revenue Maximization Using Posted Prices for Stochastic Strategic Patient Buyers · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Revenue Maximization Using Posted Prices for Stochastic Strategic Patient Buyers · AAAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regret minimization · 1.3online learning · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Learning Revenue Maximization Using Posted Prices for Stochastic Strategic Patient BuyersabstractWe consider a seller faced with buyers which have the ability to delay their decision, which we call patience. Each buyer's type is composed of value and patience, and it is sampled i.i.d. from a distribution. The seller, using posted prices, would like to maximize her revenue from selling to the buyer. In this paper, we formalize this setting and characterize the resulting Stackelberg equilibrium, where the seller first commits to her strategy, and then the buyers best respond. Following this, we show how to compute both the optimal pure and mixed strategies. We then consider a learning setting, where the seller does not have access to the distribution over buyer's types. Our main results are the following. We derive a sample complexity bound for the learning of an approximate optimal pure strategy, by computing the fat-shattering dimension of this setting. Moreover, we provide a general sample complexity bound for the approximate optimal mixed strategy. We also consider an online setting and derive a vanishing regret bound with respect to both the optimal pure strategy and the optimal mixed strategy. Eitan-Hai Mashiah, Idan Attias, Yishay Mansour |
AAAI | 1 |