Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adrian Gallus
dblp:313/9243
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-2176-5075ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 50% Program verification · 50% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Approximation and online algorithms · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Programming languages and type systems
programming paradigms |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Weighted programming: a programming paradigm for specifying mathematical models · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2022 |
Program verification › predicate transformers
weakest precondition |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Weighted programming: a programming paradigm for specifying mathematical models · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2022 |
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
competitive analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Weighted programming: a programming paradigm for specifying mathematical models · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2022 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Weighted programming: a programming paradigm for specifying mathematical models · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weakest precondition · 1.1weakest liberal precondition · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Generating Functions Meet Occupation Measures: Invariant Synthesis for Probabilistic LoopsabstractA fundamental computational task in probabilistic programming is to infer a program’s output (posterior) distribution from a given initial (prior) distribution. This problem is challenging, especially for expressive languages that feature loops or unbounded recursion. While most of the existing literature focuses on statistical approximation, in this paper we address the problem of mathematically exact inference. To achieve this for programs with loops, we rely on a relatively underexplored type of probabilistic loop invariant, which is linked to a loop’s so-called occupation measure . The occupation measure associates program states with their expected number of visits, given the initial distribution. Based on this, we derive the notion of an occupation invariant . Such invariants are essentially dual to probabilistic martingales, the predominant technique for formal probabilistic loop analysis in the literature. A key feature of occupation invariants is that they can take the initial distribution into account and often yield a proof of positive almost sure termination as a by-product. Finally, we present an automatic, template-based invariant synthesis approach for occupation invariants by encoding them as generating functions . The approach is implemented and evaluated on a set of benchmarks. Darion Haase, Kevin Batz, Adrian Gallus, Benjamin Lucien Kaminski, Joost-Pieter Katoen, Lutz Klinkenberg, Tobias Winkler 0001 |
ESOP (1) | 3 |
| 2022 | Weighted programming: a programming paradigm for specifying mathematical modelsabstractWe study weighted programming, a programming paradigm for specifying mathematical models. More specifically, the weighted programs we investigate are like usual imperative programs with two additional features: (1) nondeterministic branching and (2) weighting execution traces. Weights can be numbers but also other objects like words from an alphabet, polynomials, formal power series, or cardinal numbers. We argue that weighted programming as a paradigm can be used to specify mathematical models beyond probability distributions (as is done in probabilistic programming). We develop weakest-precondition- and weakest-liberal-precondition-style calculi à la Dijkstra for reasoning about mathematical models specified by weighted programs. We present several case studies. For instance, we use weighted programming to model the ski rental problem — an optimization problem. We model not only the optimization problem itself, but also the best deterministic online algorithm for solving this problem as weighted programs. By means of weakest-precondition-style reasoning, we can determine the competitive ratio of the online algorithm on source code level. Kevin Batz, Adrian Gallus, Benjamin Lucien Kaminski, Joost-Pieter Katoen, Tobias Winkler 0001 |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 2 |