EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert

Christian Aeberhard

dblp:313/9334 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › smart contract security
vulnerability detection		 0.612022
Less is More: Supporting Developers in Vulnerability Detection during Code Review · ICSE 2022
Software maintenance and evolution
code review		 0.612022
Less is More: Supporting Developers in Vulnerability Detection during Code Review · ICSE 2022
Software maintenance and evolution › code review
secure code review		 0.612022
Less is More: Supporting Developers in Vulnerability Detection during Code Review · ICSE 2022
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Less is More: Supporting Developers in Vulnerability Detection during Code Review
abstract
Reviewing source code from a security perspective has proven to be a difficult task. Indeed, previous research has shown that developers often miss even popular and easy-to-detect vulnerabilities during code review. Initial evidence suggests that a significant cause may lie in the reviewers' mental attitude and common practices.
Larissa Braz, Christian Aeberhard, Gül Çalikli, Alberto Bacchelli
 ICSE2