EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jack J. Mayo
dblp:313/9555
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 52% Mathematical optimization · 33% Approximation and online algorithms · 14% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Learning theory · 58% Optimization for machine learning · 25% Reinforcement learning · 17% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › multi-armed bandit
contextual bandits |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | An Improved Algorithm for Adversarial Linear Contextual Bandits via Reduction · NeurIPS 2025 First- and Second-Order Bounds for Adversarial Linear Contextual Bandits · NeurIPS 2023 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › multi-armed bandit
linear bandits |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | An Improved Algorithm for Adversarial Linear Contextual Bandits via Reduction · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Online Newton Method for Bandit Convex Optimisation Extended Abstract · COLT 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Online Newton Method for Bandit Convex Optimisation Extended Abstract · COLT 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
bandit convex optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Online Newton Method for Bandit Convex Optimisation Extended Abstract · COLT 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Online Newton Method for Bandit Convex Optimisation Extended Abstract · COLT 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | First- and Second-Order Bounds for Adversarial Linear Contextual Bandits · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
second-order bounds |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | First- and Second-Order Bounds for Adversarial Linear Contextual Bandits · NeurIPS 2023 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | First- and Second-Order Bounds for Adversarial Linear Contextual Bandits · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › online optimization
adaptive regret bounds |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Scale-free Unconstrained Online Learning for Curved Losses · COLT 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
online convex optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Scale-free Unconstrained Online Learning for Curved Losses · COLT 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › online optimization
unconstrained online learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Scale-free Unconstrained Online Learning for Curved Losses · COLT 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
zeroth-order optimization · 1.5online newton method · 1.5linear bandit reduction · 1.3exponential weights · 1.3regret analysis · 0.9reduction · 0.9scale-free algorithms · 0.6online gradient descent · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | An Improved Algorithm for Adversarial Linear Contextual Bandits via ReductionabstractWe present an efficient algorithm for linear contextual bandits with adversarial losses and stochastic action sets. Our approach reduces this setting to misspecification-robust adversarial linear bandits with fixed action sets. Without knowledge of the context distribution or access to
a context simulator, the algorithm achieves $\tilde{O}(\min\{d^2\sqrt{T}, \sqrt{d^3T\log K}\})$ regret and runs in $\mathrm{poly}(d,C,T)$ time, where $d$ is the feature dimension, $C$ is an upper bound on the number of linear constraints defining the action set in each round, $K$ is an upper bound on the number of actions in each round, and $T$ is number of rounds. This resolves the open question by Liu et al. (2023) on whether one can obtain $\mathrm{poly}(d)\sqrt{T}$ regret in polynomial time independent of the number of actions. For the important class of combinatorial bandits with adversarial losses and stochastic action sets where the action sets can be described by a polynomial number of linear constraints, our algorithm is the first to achieve $\mathrm{poly}(d)\sqrt{T}$ regret in polynomial time, while no prior algorithm achieves even $o(T)$ regret in polynomial time to our knowledge. When a simulator is available, the regret bound can be improved to $\tilde{O}(d\sqrt{L^\star})$, where $L^\star$ is the cumulative loss of the best policy. Tim van Erven, Jack J. Mayo, Julia Olkhovskaya, Chen-Yu Wei |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Online Newton Method for Bandit Convex Optimisation Extended AbstractabstractWe introduce a computationally efficient algorithm for zeroth-order bandit convex optimisation and prove that in the adversarial setting its regret is at most $d^{3.5} \sqrt{n} \mathrm{polylog}(n, d)$ with high probability where $d$ is the dimension and $n$ is the time horizon. In the stochastic setting the bound improves to $M d^{2} \sqrt{n} \mathrm{polylog}(n, d)$ where $M \in [d^{-1/2}, d^{-1/4}]$ is a constant that depends on the geometry of the constraint set and the desired computational properties. Hidde Fokkema, Dirk van der Hoeven, Tor Lattimore, Jack J. Mayo |
COLT | 4 |
| 2023 | First- and Second-Order Bounds for Adversarial Linear Contextual BanditsabstractWe consider the adversarial linear contextual bandit setting, which
allows for the loss functions associated with each of $K$ arms to change
over time without restriction. Assuming the $d$-dimensional contexts are
drawn from a fixed known distribution, the worst-case expected regret
over the course of $T$ rounds is known to scale as $\tilde O(\sqrt{Kd
T})$. Under the additional assumption that the density of the contexts
is log-concave, we obtain a second-order bound of order $\tilde
O(K\sqrt{d V_T})$ in terms of the cumulative second moment of the
learner's losses $V_T$, and a closely related first-order bound of order
$\tilde O(K\sqrt{d L_T^*})$ in terms of the cumulative loss of the best
policy $L_T^*$. Since $V_T$ or $L_T^*$ may be significantly smaller than
$T$, these improve over the worst-case regret whenever the environment
is relatively benign. Our results are obtained using a truncated version
of the continuous exponential weights algorithm over the probability
simplex, which we analyse by exploiting a novel connection to the linear
bandit setting without contexts. Julia Olkhovskaya, Jack J. Mayo, Tim van Erven, Gergely Neu, Chen-Yu Wei |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | Scale-free Unconstrained Online Learning for Curved LossesabstractA sequence of works in unconstrained online convex optimisation have investigated the possibility of adapting simultaneously to the norm U of the comparator and the maximum norm G of the gradients. In full generality, matching upper and lower bounds are known which show that this comes at the unavoidable cost of an additive GU^3, which is not needed when either G or U is known in advance. Surprisingly, recent results by Kempka et al. (2019) show that no such price for adaptivity is needed in the specific case of 1-Lipschitz losses like the hinge loss. We follow up on this observation by showing that there is in fact never a price to pay for adaptivity if we specialise to any of the other common supervised online learning losses: our results cover log loss, (linear and non-parametric) logistic regression, square loss prediction, and (linear and non-parametric) least-squares regression. We also fill in several gaps in the literature by providing matching lower bounds with an explicit dependence on U. In all cases we obtain scale-free algorithms, which are suitably invariant under rescaling of the data. Our general goal is to establish achievable rates without concern for computational efficiency, but for linear logistic regression we also provide an adaptive method that is as efficient as the recent non-adaptive algorithm by Agarwal et al. (2021). Jack J. Mayo, Hédi Hadiji, Tim van Erven |
COLT | 1 |