Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Toon Vanderschueren

dblp:313/9981 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7202-1589ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 62% Optimization for machine learning · 28% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 10%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
1.522025
AutoCATE: End-to-End, Automated Treatment Effect Estimation · ICML 2025
Accounting For Informative Sampling When Learning to Forecast Treatment Outcomes Over Time · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
treatment effect estimation
1.522025
AutoCATE: End-to-End, Automated Treatment Effect Estimation · ICML 2025
Accounting For Informative Sampling When Learning to Forecast Treatment Outcomes Over Time · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
combined algorithm selection and hyperparameter optimization
0.912025
AutoCATE: End-to-End, Automated Treatment Effect Estimation · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › heterogeneous treatment effect estimation
conditional average treatment effect
0.912025
AutoCATE: End-to-End, Automated Treatment Effect Estimation · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.912025
AutoCATE: End-to-End, Automated Treatment Effect Estimation · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain shift
covariate shift
0.712023
Accounting For Informative Sampling When Learning to Forecast Treatment Outcomes Over Time · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ensembling · 0.9automated machine learning · 0.9neural controlled differential equations · 0.7inverse intensity-weighting · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 AutoCATE: End-to-End, Automated Treatment Effect Estimation
abstract
Estimating causal effects is crucial in domains like healthcare, economics, and education. Despite advances in machine learning (ML) for estimating conditional average treatment effects (CATE), the practical adoption of these methods remains limited, due to the complexities of implementing, tuning, and validating them. To address these challenges, we formalize the search for an optimal ML pipeline for CATE estimation as a counterfactual Combined Algorithm Selection and Hyperparameter (CASH) optimization. We introduce AutoCATE, the first end-to-end, automated solution for CATE estimation. Unlike prior approaches that address only parts of this problem, AutoCATE integrates evaluation, estimation, and ensembling in a unified framework. AutoCATE enables comprehensive comparisons of different protocols, yielding novel insights into CATE estimation and a final configuration that outperforms commonly used strategies. To facilitate broad adoption and further research, we release AutoCATE as an open-source software package.
Toon Vanderschueren, Tim Verdonck, Mihaela van der Schaar, Wouter Verbeke
ICML1
2024 A new perspective on classification: Optimally allocating limited resources to uncertain tasks
Toon Vanderschueren, Bart Baesens, Tim Verdonck, Wouter Verbeke
Decis. Support Syst.1
2023 Accounting For Informative Sampling When Learning to Forecast Treatment Outcomes Over Time
abstract
Machine learning (ML) holds great potential for accurately forecasting treatment outcomes over time, which could ultimately enable the adoption of more individualized treatment strategies in many practical applications. However, a significant challenge that has been largely overlooked by the ML literature on this topic is the presence of informative sampling in observational data. When instances are observed irregularly over time, sampling times are typically not random, but rather informative–depending on the instance’s characteristics, past outcomes, and administered treatments. In this work, we formalize informative sampling as a covariate shift problem and show that it can prohibit accurate estimation of treatment outcomes if not properly accounted for. To overcome this challenge, we present a general framework for learning treatment outcomes in the presence of informative sampling using inverse intensity-weighting, and propose a novel method, TESAR-CDE, that instantiates this framework using Neural CDEs. Using a simulation environment based on a clinical use case, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in learning under informative sampling.
Toon Vanderschueren, Alicia Curth, Wouter Verbeke, Mihaela van der Schaar
ICML1
2022 Predict-then-optimize or predict-and-optimize? An empirical evaluation of cost-sensitive learning strategies
Toon Vanderschueren, Tim Verdonck, Bart Baesens, Wouter Verbeke
Inf. Sci.1