Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chenjie Pan

dblp:314/3304 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-9319-0984ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 46% Reinforcement learning · 46% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 7%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
StoryCrafter: Instance-Aligned Multi-Character Storytelling with Diffusion Policy Learning · ACM Multimedia 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
diffusion policy optimization
0.912025
StoryCrafter: Instance-Aligned Multi-Character Storytelling with Diffusion Policy Learning · ACM Multimedia 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback
0.912025
StoryCrafter: Instance-Aligned Multi-Character Storytelling with Diffusion Policy Learning · ACM Multimedia 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
0.912025
StoryCrafter: Instance-Aligned Multi-Character Storytelling with Diffusion Policy Learning · ACM Multimedia 2025
Data mining
time series analysis
0.912025
CMA: A Unified Contextual Meta-Adaptation Methodology for Time-Series Denoising and Prediction · KDD (2) 2025
Data mining › time series analysis
time series forecasting
0.912025
CMA: A Unified Contextual Meta-Adaptation Methodology for Time-Series Denoising and Prediction · KDD (2) 2025
Visualization and visual analytics
visual storytelling
0.912025
StoryCrafter: Instance-Aligned Multi-Character Storytelling with Diffusion Policy Learning · ACM Multimedia 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.312025
CMA: A Unified Contextual Meta-Adaptation Methodology for Time-Series Denoising and Prediction · KDD (2) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning from human feedback · 1.7meta-learning · 1.7group relative policy optimization · 1.7diffusion model · 1.7cross-attention · 1.7contextual adaptation · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CMA: A Unified Contextual Meta-Adaptation Methodology for Time-Series Denoising and Prediction
Haiqi Jiang 0003, Ying Ding 0007, Chenjie Pan, Aimin Huang, Chenyou Fan
KDD (2)3
2025 StoryCrafter: Instance-Aligned Multi-Character Storytelling with Diffusion Policy Learning
abstract
Open-ended visual storytelling presents a formidable challenge for current text-to-image models, which frequently struggle to preserve both narrative coherence and consistent character depictions across generated sequences. To address this, we introduce StoryCrafter, a multi-character diffusion model that leverages a novel instance-level cross-attention module with supervised fine-tuning to ensure precise text-character alignment and consistent multi-character interactions throughout the narrative. Further, we propose Direct-Diffusion Group Relative Policy Optimization (D2GRPO), a novel RLHF stage that optimizes denoising strategies using automated story-aligned rewards, selecting the best candidate frames from a generated group. We evaluate our approach through human assessments and vision language model (VLM) scoring, measuring text-to-image alignment, style and character consistency, and fine-grained detail quality. Experiments on three benchmarks demonstrate that StoryCrafter outperforms existing methods, achieving 7% improvements in storytelling consistency and 10% in character accuracy, while outperforming baselines in both human and VLM evaluations.
Ruiqi Dong, Wenjing Pang, Chenjie Pan, Hengyang Lu, Chenyou Fan
ACM Multimedia3