Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
R. L. Pritchard
dblp:314/5229
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Integrated circuit design · 50% Electronic design automation · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › circuit modeling
equivalent circuit modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Transistor equivalent circuits · Proc. IEEE 1998 |
Integrated circuit design › semiconductor device modeling
transistor modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Transistor equivalent circuits · Proc. IEEE 1998 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | Transistor equivalent circuitsabstractThis paper surveys the history of the electric-circuit representation of the transistor over the past fifty years. During the first two decades after the transistor was announced in 1948, primary emphasis was on small-signal equivalent circuits, which could be used for linear-circuit analysis and design. In addition, parameters of many of these equivalent circuits for the bipolar junction transistor, which are described, were related to the physical construction of the device. Approximately two-thirds of the paper is devoted to this period, when the writer personally contributed to this effort. By the beginning of the third decade, transistor circuits had became more complex, and circuit analysis was carried out with the help of digital computers. Interest then shifted away from small-signal equivalent circuits to "models" for computer-aided circuit design (CACD). This transition, including the models used in the widely used CACD program SPICE, is described. MOS transistors are treated only briefly; by the time MOS transistors became commercially viable devices, emphasis then also had shifted to "models" for CACD. In conclusion, the writer notes that there is still hope for us aficionados of small-signal equivalent circuits; new types of transistors are still being characterized in this manner. R. L. Pritchard |
Proc. IEEE | 1 |