Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Björn List
dblp:314/5406
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering › partial differential equation solver
neural PDE solver |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | INC: An Indirect Neural Corrector for Auto-Regressive Hybrid PDE Solvers · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › partial differential equations
partial differential equation simulation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | INC: An Indirect Neural Corrector for Auto-Regressive Hybrid PDE Solvers · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | INC: An Indirect Neural Corrector for Auto-Regressive Hybrid PDE Solvers · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural corrector · 0.9autoregressive error correction · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | INC: An Indirect Neural Corrector for Auto-Regressive Hybrid PDE SolversabstractWhen simulating partial differential equations, hybrid solvers combine coarse numerical solvers with learned correctors. They promise accelerated simulations while adhering to physical constraints. However, as shown in our theoretical framework, directly applying learned corrections to solver outputs leads to significant autoregressive errors, which originate from amplified perturbations that accumulate during long-term rollouts, especially in chaotic regimes. To overcome this, we propose the Indirect Neural Corrector ($\mathrm{INC}$), which integrates learned corrections into the governing equations rather than applying direct state updates. Our key insight is that $\mathrm{INC}$ reduces the error amplification on the order of $\Delta t^{-1} + L$, where $\Delta t$ is the timestep and $L$ the Lipschitz constant. At the same time, our framework poses no architectural requirements and integrates seamlessly with arbitrary neural networks and solvers. We test $\mathrm{INC}$ in extensive benchmarks, covering numerous differentiable solvers, neural backbones, and test cases ranging from a 1D chaotic system to 3D turbulence. INC improves the long-term trajectory performance ($R^2$) by up to 158.7\%, stabilizes blowups under aggressive coarsening, and for complex 3D turbulence cases yields speed-ups of several orders of magnitude. INC thus enables stable, efficient PDE emulation with formal error reduction, paving the way for faster scientific and engineering simulations with reliable physics guarantees. Aleksandra Franz, Björn List, Nils Thürey |
NeurIPS | 3 |