Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michelle Ho

dblp:314/5697 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 56% Trustworthy machine learning · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explainable AI
1.012026
Trustworthy Autonomy Without Human Intervention in Uncertain Domains · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
planning under uncertainty
1.012026
Trustworthy Autonomy Without Human Intervention in Uncertain Domains · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › plan execution
failure recovery
0.312026
Trustworthy Autonomy Without Human Intervention in Uncertain Domains · AAAI 2026
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Trustworthy Autonomy Without Human Intervention in Uncertain Domains
abstract
Autonomous systems operating in uncertain environments without human intervention must consider several factors, including safety, reliability, and task success. State-of-the-art methods have made progress in addressing these factors individually, but often fail to unify them for deployment in real-world systems. My dissertation aims to combine methods in planning under uncertainty, failure recovery, and explainability, providing a holistic framework for comprehensive safe autonomy in real-world deployment.
Michelle Ho
AAAI1
2025 Model Identification Adaptive Control with ρ-POMDP Planning
abstract
Accurate system modeling is crucial for safe, effective control, as misidentification can lead to accumulated errors, especially under partial observability. We address this problem by formulating informative input design and model identification adaptive control (MIAC) as belief space planning problems, modeled as partially observable Markov decision processes with belief-dependent rewards (ρ-POMDPs). We treat system parameters as hidden state variables that must be localized while simultaneously controlling the system. We solve this problem with an adapted belief-space iterative Linear Quadratic Regulator (BiLQR). We demonstrate it on fully and partially observable tasks for cart-pole and steady aircraft flight domains. Our method outperforms baselines such as regression, filtering, and local optimal control methods, even under instantaneous disturbances to system parameters.
Michelle Ho, Arec L. Jamgochian, Mykel J. Kochenderfer
CoDIT1
2022 Towards a Framework for Comparing the Complexity of Robotic Tasks
Michelle Ho, Alec Farid, Anirudha Majumdar
WAFR1