Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Justin Jude
dblp:314/6181
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 31% Representation and self-supervised learning · 27% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 15% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
sequential variational autoencoder |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Robust alignment of cross-session recordings of neural population activity by behaviour via unsupervised domain adaptation · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
unsupervised domain adaptation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Robust alignment of cross-session recordings of neural population activity by behaviour via unsupervised domain adaptation · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Robust alignment of cross-session recordings of neural population activity by behaviour via unsupervised domain adaptation · ICML 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Robust alignment of cross-session recordings of neural population activity by behaviour via unsupervised domain adaptation · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning › state representation learning
latent dynamics model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Targeted Neural Dynamical Modeling · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Targeted Neural Dynamical Modeling · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
neural population activity |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Targeted Neural Dynamical Modeling · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Targeted Neural Dynamical Modeling · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequential variational autoencoder · 1.6unsupervised domain adaptation · 1.1latent variable model · 1.1nonlinear state-space model · 0.5linear decoder · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Robust alignment of cross-session recordings of neural population activity by behaviour via unsupervised domain adaptationabstractNeural population activity relating to behaviour is assumed to be inherently low-dimensional despite the observed high dimensionality of data recorded using multi-electrode arrays. Therefore, predicting behaviour from neural population recordings has been shown to be most effective when using latent variable models. Over time however, the activity of single neurons can drift, and different neurons will be recorded due to movement of implanted neural probes. This means that a decoder trained to predict behaviour on one day performs worse when tested on a different day. On the other hand, evidence suggests that the latent dynamics underlying behaviour may be stable even over months and years. Based on this idea, we introduce a model capable of inferring behaviourally relevant latent dynamics from previously unseen data recorded from the same animal, without any need for decoder recalibration. We show that unsupervised domain adaptation combined with a sequential variational autoencoder, trained on several sessions, can achieve good generalisation to unseen data and correctly predict behaviour where conventional methods fail. Our results further support the hypothesis that behaviour-related neural dynamics are low-dimensional and stable over time, and will enable more effective and flexible use of brain computer interface technologies. Justin Jude, Matthew G. Perich, Lee E. Miller, Matthias H. Hennig |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Targeted Neural Dynamical ModelingabstractLatent dynamics models have emerged as powerful tools for modeling and interpreting neural population activity. Recently, there has been a focus on incorporating simultaneously measured behaviour into these models to further disentangle sources of neural variability in their latent space. These approaches, however, are limited in their ability to capture the underlying neural dynamics (e.g. linear) and in their ability to relate the learned dynamics back to the observed behaviour (e.g. no time lag). To this end, we introduce Targeted Neural Dynamical Modeling (TNDM), a nonlinear state-space model that jointly models the neural activity and external behavioural variables. TNDM decomposes neural dynamics into behaviourally relevant and behaviourally irrelevant dynamics; the relevant dynamics are used to reconstruct the behaviour through a flexible linear decoder and both sets of dynamics are used to reconstruct the neural activity through a linear decoder with no time lag. We implement TNDM as a sequential variational autoencoder and validate it on simulated recordings and recordings taken from the premotor and motor cortex of a monkey performing a center-out reaching task. We show that TNDM is able to learn low-dimensional latent dynamics that are highly predictive of behaviour without sacrificing its fit to the neural data. Cole L. Hurwitz, Akash Srivastava, Kai Xu 0016, Justin Jude, Matthew G. Perich, Lee E. Miller, Matthias H. Hennig |
NeurIPS | 4 |