Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Leello Tadesse Dadi
dblp:314/6241 · also Leello Dadi
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
1as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2580-4913ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 1 first-author · 8 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Learning theory · 35% Optimization for machine learning · 20% Generative modeling · 16% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 25 heaviest of 28, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
2.1 | 3 | 2025 | Generalization of noisy SGD in unbounded non-convex settings · ICML 2025 Learning with Norm Constrained, Over-parameterized, Two-layer Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 The Effect of the Intrinsic Dimension on the Generalization of Quadratic Classifiers · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Learning with Norm Constrained, Over-parameterized, Two-layer Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 The Effect of the Intrinsic Dimension on the Generalization of Quadratic Classifiers · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
conditional flow matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Faster Inference of Flow-Based Generative Models via Improved Data-Noise Coupling · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Faster Inference of Flow-Based Generative Models via Improved Data-Noise Coupling · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Faster Inference of Flow-Based Generative Models via Improved Data-Noise Coupling · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
information-theoretic generalization bounds |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Generalization of noisy SGD in unbounded non-convex settings · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo › langevin dynamics
stochastic gradient langevin dynamics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Generalization of noisy SGD in unbounded non-convex settings · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › approximation theory
barron space |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning with Norm Constrained, Over-parameterized, Two-layer Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
norm-constrained neural networks |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning with Norm Constrained, Over-parameterized, Two-layer Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
finite-sum optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Efficient Continual Finite-Sum Minimization · ICLR 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
first-order methods |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Efficient Continual Finite-Sum Minimization · ICLR 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Efficient Continual Finite-Sum Minimization · ICLR 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › gradient descent
SVRG |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Efficient Continual Finite-Sum Minimization · ICLR 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
variance reduction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Efficient Continual Finite-Sum Minimization · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Finding Actual Descent Directions for Adversarial Training · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Finding Actual Descent Directions for Adversarial Training · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic optimization
finite-sum optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Adaptive Stochastic Variance Reduction for Non-convex Finite-Sum Minimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Adaptive Stochastic Variance Reduction for Non-convex Finite-Sum Minimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network › multilayer neural network
polynomial neural networks |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Spectral Bias of Polynomial Neural Networks · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Adaptive Stochastic Variance Reduction for Non-convex Finite-Sum Minimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Adaptive Stochastic Variance Reduction for Non-convex Finite-Sum Minimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning
intrinsic dimension |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Effect of the Intrinsic Dimension on the Generalization of Quadratic Classifiers · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
rademacher complexity |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Effect of the Intrinsic Dimension on the Generalization of Quadratic Classifiers · NeurIPS 2021 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Generalization of noisy SGD in unbounded non-convex settings · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
oracle complexity |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Adaptive Stochastic Variance Reduction for Non-convex Finite-Sum Minimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stability analysis · 1.7renyi divergence · 1.7log-sobolev inequality · 1.7isoperimetric inequality · 1.7optimal transport · 0.9minibatch coupling · 0.9distillation · 0.9strong convexity · 0.8metric entropy · 0.8first-order oracle complexity · 0.8convex hull technique · 0.8RKHS · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Faster Inference of Flow-Based Generative Models via Improved Data-Noise CouplingabstractConditional Flow Matching (CFM), a simulation-free method for training continuous normalizing flows, provides an efficient alternative to diffusion models for key tasks like image and video generation. The performance of CFM in solving these tasks depends on the way data is coupled with noise. A recent approach uses minibatch optimal transport (OT) to reassign noise-data pairs in each training step to streamline sampling trajectories and thus accelerate inference. However, its optimization is restricted to individual minibatches, limiting its effectiveness on large datasets. To address this shortcoming, we introduce LOOM-CFM (Looking Out Of Minibatch-CFM), a novel method to extend the scope of minibatch OT by preserving and optimizing these assignments across minibatches over training time. Our approach demonstrates consistent improvements in the sampling speed-quality trade-off across multiple datasets. LOOM-CFM also enhances distillation initialization and supports high-resolution synthesis in latent space training. Aram Davtyan, Leello Tadesse Dadi, Volkan Cevher, Paolo Favaro |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | Generalization of noisy SGD in unbounded non-convex settingsabstractWe study generalization of iterative noisy gradient schemes on smooth non-convex losses. Formally, we establish time-independent information theoretic generalization bounds for Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) that do not diverge as the iteration count increases. Our bounds are obtained through a stability argument: we analyze the difference between two SGLD sequences ran in parallel on two datasets sampled from the same distribution. Our result only requires an isoperimetric inequality to hold, which is merely a restriction on the tails of the loss. Our work relaxes the assumptions of prior work to establish that the iterates stay within a bounded KL divergence from each other. Under an additional dissipativity assumption, we show that the stronger Renyi divergence also stays bounded by establishing a uniform log-Sobolev constant of the iterates. Without dissipativity, we sidestep the need for local log-Sobolev inequalities and instead exploit the regularizing properties of Gaussian convolution. These techniques allow us to show that strong convexity is not necessary for finite stability bounds. Our work shows that noisy SGD can have finite, iteration-independent, generalization and differential privacy bounds in unbounded non-convex settings. Leello Tadesse Dadi, Volkan Cevher |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Efficient Continual Finite-Sum MinimizationabstractGiven a sequence of functions $f_1,\ldots,f_n$ with $f_i:\mathcal{D}\mapsto \mathbb{R}$, finite-sum minimization seeks a point ${x}^\star \in \mathcal{D}$ minimizing $\sum_{j=1}^nf_j(x)/n$. In this work, we propose a key twist into the finite-sum minimization, dubbed as *continual finite-sum minimization*, that asks for a sequence of points $x_1^\star, \ldots, x_n^\star \in D$ such that each ${x}^\star_i \in D$ minimizes the prefix-sum $\sum_{j=1}^if_j(x)/i$. Assuming that each prefix-sum is strongly convex, we develop a first-order continual stochastic variance reduction gradient method ($\mathrm{CSVRG}$) producing an $\epsilon$-optimal sequence with $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n/\epsilon^{1/3} + 1/\sqrt{\epsilon})$ overall *first-order oracles* (FO). An FO corresponds to the computation of a single gradient $\nabla f_j(x)$ at a given $x \in \mathcal{D}$ for some $j \in [n]$. Our approach significantly improves upon the $\mathcal{O}(n/\epsilon)$ FOs that $\mathrm{StochasticGradientDescent}$ requires and the $\mathcal{O}(n^2 \log (1/\epsilon))$ FOs that state-of-the-art variance reduction methods such as $\mathrm{Katyusha}$ require. We also prove that there is no natural first-order method with $\mathcal{O}\left(n/\epsilon^\alpha\right)$ gradient complexity for $\alpha < 1/4$, establishing that the first-order complexity of our method is nearly tight. Ioannis Mavrothalassitis, Stratis Skoulakis, Leello Tadesse Dadi, Volkan Cevher |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | Convergence to Equilibrium of No-Regret Dynamics in Congestion Games
Volkan Cevher, Wei Chen 0020, Leello Tadesse Dadi, Jing Dong 0008, Ioannis Panageas, Stratis Skoulakis, Luca Viano, Baoxiang Wang 0001, Siwei Wang 0002, Jingyu Wu |
WINE | 3 |
| 2024 | Learning with Norm Constrained, Over-parameterized, Two-layer Neural NetworksabstractRecent studies show that a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) is not a suitable space to model functions by neural networks as the curse of dimensionality (CoD) cannot be evaded when trying to approximate even a single ReLU neuron. In this paper, we study a suitable function space for over-parameterized two-layer neural networks with bounded norms (e.g., the path norm, the Barron norm) in the perspective of sample complexity and generalization properties. First, we show that the path norm (as well as the Barron norm) is able to obtain width-independence sample complexity bounds, which allows for uniform convergence guarantees. Based on this result, we derive the improved result of metric entropy for $\epsilon$-covering up to $O(\epsilon^{-\frac{2d}{d+2}})$ ($d$ is the input dimension and the depending constant is at most polynomial order of $d$) via the convex hull technique, which demonstrates the separation with kernel methods with $\Omega(\epsilon^{-d})$ to learn the target function in a Barron space. Second, this metric entropy result allows for building a sharper generalization bound under a general moment hypothesis setting, achieving the rate at $O(n^{-\frac{d+2}{2d+2}})$. Our analysis is novel in that it offers a sharper and refined estimation for metric entropy (with a clear dependence relationship on the dimension $d$) and unbounded sampling in the estimation of the sample error and the output error. Fanghui Liu 0001, Leello Tadesse Dadi, Volkan Cevher |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2023 | Finding Actual Descent Directions for Adversarial Training
Fabian Latorre, Igor Krawczuk, Leello Tadesse Dadi, Thomas Pethick, Volkan Cevher |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2022 | The Spectral Bias of Polynomial Neural Networks
Moulik Choraria, Leello Tadesse Dadi, Grigorios Chrysos 0002, Julien Mairal, Volkan Cevher |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | Adaptive Stochastic Variance Reduction for Non-convex Finite-Sum MinimizationabstractWe propose an adaptive variance-reduction method, called AdaSpider, for minimization of $L$-smooth, non-convex functions with a finite-sum structure. In essence, AdaSpider combines an AdaGrad-inspired (Duchi et al., 2011), but a fairly distinct, adaptive step-size schedule with the recursive \textit{stochastic path integrated estimator} proposed in (Fang et al., 2018). To our knowledge, AdaSpider is the first parameter-free non-convex variance-reduction method in the sense that it does not require the knowledge of problem-dependent parameters, such as smoothness constant $L$, target accuracy $\epsilon$ or any bound on gradient norms. In doing so, we are able to compute an $\epsilon$-stationary point with $\tilde{O}\left(n + \sqrt{n}/\epsilon^2\right)$ oracle-calls, which matches the respective lower bound up to logarithmic factors. Ali Kavis, Stratis Skoulakis, Kimon Antonakopoulos, Leello Tadesse Dadi, Volkan Cevher |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2021 | The Effect of the Intrinsic Dimension on the Generalization of Quadratic ClassifiersabstractIt has been recently observed that neural networks, unlike kernel methods, enjoy a reduced sample complexity when the distribution is isotropic (i.e., when the covariance matrix is the identity). We find that this sensitivity to the data distribution is not exclusive to neural networks, and the same phenomenon can be observed on the class of quadratic classifiers (i.e., the sign of a quadratic polynomial) with a nuclear-norm constraint. We demonstrate this by deriving an upper bound on the Rademacher Complexity that depends on two key quantities: (i) the intrinsic dimension, which is a measure of isotropy, and (ii) the largest eigenvalue of the second moment (covariance) matrix of the distribution. Our result improves the dependence on the dimension over the best previously known bound and precisely quantifies the relation between the sample complexity and the level of isotropy of the distribution. Fabian Latorre, Leello Tadesse Dadi, Paul Rolland, Volkan Cevher |
NeurIPS | 2 |