Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aileen Abril Castro-Guzman

dblp:314/6457 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 50% Software maintenance and evolution · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering › open source software
commercial participation in open source
0.712023
Rules of Engagement: Why and How Companies Participate in OSS · ICSE 2023
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.712023
Rules of Engagement: Why and How Companies Participate in OSS · ICSE 2023
Software maintenance and evolution › software ecosystems
open source software ecosystem
0.712023
Rules of Engagement: Why and How Companies Participate in OSS · ICSE 2023
Software maintenance and evolution
software ecosystems
0.712023
Rules of Engagement: Why and How Companies Participate in OSS · ICSE 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-structured interviews · 1.3qualitative analysis · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Rules of Engagement: Why and How Companies Participate in OSS
abstract
Company engagement in open source (OSS) is now the new norm. From large technology companies to startups, companies are participating in the OSS ecosystem by open-sourcing their technology, sponsoring projects through funding or paid developer time. However, our understanding of the OSS ecosystem is rooted in the “old world” model where individual contributors sustain OSS projects. In this work, we create a more comprehensive understanding of the hybrid OSS landscape by investigating what motivates companies to contribute and how they contribute to OSS. We conducted interviews with 20 participants who have different roles (e.g., CEO, OSPO Lead, Ecosystem Strategist) at 17 different companies of different sizes from large companies (e.g. Microsoft, RedHat, Google, Spotify) to startups. Data from semi-structured interviews reveal that company motivations can be categorized into four levels (Founders' Vision, Reputation, Business Advantage, and Reciprocity) and companies participate through different mechanisms (e.g., Developers' Time, Mentoring Time, Advocacy & Promotion Time), each of which tie to the different types of motivations. We hope our findings nudge more companies to participate in the OSS ecosystem, helping make it robust, diverse, and sustainable.
Mariam Guizani, Aileen Abril Castro-Guzman, Anita Sarma, Igor Steinmacher
ICSE2