Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aryaman Singh Samyal
dblp:314/6633
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 44% Reinforcement learning · 44% Robot navigation and mapping · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
compositional reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Multifidelity Sim-to-Real Pipeline for Verifiable and Compositional Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
sim-to-real transfer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Multifidelity Sim-to-Real Pipeline for Verifiable and Compositional Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation › ground vehicle navigation
unmanned ground vehicle navigation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A Multifidelity Sim-to-Real Pipeline for Verifiable and Compositional Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multifidelity simulation · 0.8compositional verification · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | A Multifidelity Sim-to-Real Pipeline for Verifiable and Compositional Reinforcement LearningabstractWe propose and demonstrate a compositional framework for training and verifying reinforcement learning (RL) systems within a multifidelity sim-to-real pipeline, in order to deploy reliable and adaptable RL policies on physical hardware. By decomposing complex robotic tasks into component subtasks and defining mathematical interfaces between them, the framework allows for the independent training and testing of the corresponding subtask policies, while simultaneously providing guarantees on the overall behavior that results from their composition. By verifying the performance of these subtask policies using a multifidelity simulation pipeline, the framework not only allows for efficient RL training, but also for a refinement of the subtasks and their interfaces in response to challenges arising from discrepancies between simulation and reality. In an experimental case study, we apply the framework to train and deploy a compositional RL system that successfully pilots a Warthog unmanned ground robot. Cyrus Neary, Christian Ellis, Aryaman Singh Samyal, Craig Lennon, Ufuk Topcu |
ICRA | 3 |