Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Junzhou He

dblp:314/8336 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-4088-1592ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Systems and software security · 71% Hardware security and side channels · 29%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Compilers and program optimization · 43% Program synthesis and code generation · 43% Program analysis · 15%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
fuzzing
0.912025
WBSan: WebAssembly Bug Detection for Sanitization and Binary-Only Fuzzing · WWW 2025
Systems and software security › memory safety
memory error detection
0.912025
WBSan: WebAssembly Bug Detection for Sanitization and Binary-Only Fuzzing · WWW 2025
Systems and software security
memory safety
0.912025
WBSan: WebAssembly Bug Detection for Sanitization and Binary-Only Fuzzing · WWW 2025
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel attack
0.912025
WaSCR: A WebAssembly Instruction-Timing Side Channel Repairer · WWW 2025
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack
timing side channel
0.912025
WaSCR: A WebAssembly Instruction-Timing Side Channel Repairer · WWW 2025
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery
0.912025
WBSan: WebAssembly Bug Detection for Sanitization and Binary-Only Fuzzing · WWW 2025
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
0.812024
StackSight: Unveiling WebAssembly through Large Language Models and Neurosymbolic Chain-of-Thought Decompilation · ICML 2024
Compilers and program optimization
decompilation
0.812024
StackSight: Unveiling WebAssembly through Large Language Models and Neurosymbolic Chain-of-Thought Decompilation · ICML 2024
Program analysis › dynamic analysis › instrumentation
binary instrumentation
0.312025
WBSan: WebAssembly Bug Detection for Sanitization and Binary-Only Fuzzing · WWW 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

static analysis · 2.5sanitization · 1.7fuzzing · 1.7binary instrumentation · 1.7instruction timing analysis · 0.9large language model · 0.8chain-of-thought prompting · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 WaSCR: A WebAssembly Instruction-Timing Side Channel Repairer
abstract
WebAssembly (Wasm) is a platform-independent, low-level binary language that enables near-native performance in web applications. Given its growing importance in the web ecosystem, securing WebAssembly programs becomes increasingly important. A key security concern with WebAssembly is the threat of instruction-timing side-channel attacks, which exploit timing variations in branch instructions dependent on sensitive data, allowing attackers to infer sensitive information through timing measurement.
Liyan Huang, Junzhou He, Chao Wang 0001, Weihang Wang 0001
WWW2
2025 WBSan: WebAssembly Bug Detection for Sanitization and Binary-Only Fuzzing
abstract
With the advancement of WebAssembly, abbreviated as Wasm, various memory bugs and undefined behaviors have emerged, leading to security issues that affect usability and portability. Existing methods struggle to detect these problems in Wasm binaries due to challenges associated with binary instrumentation and the difficulty of defining legal memory bounds.While sanitizers combined with fuzzing are recognized as effective means for identifying bugs, current Wasm sanitizers necessitate compile-time instrumentation, rendering them unsuitable for practical scenarios where only binaries are accessible. In this paper, we propose WBSan, the first Wasm binary sanitizer employing static analysis and Wasm binary instrumentation to detect memory bugs and undefined behaviors. We develop distinct instrumentation patterns tailored for each type of bug and introduce Wasm shadow memory to address complex memory bugs. Our results reveal that WBSan achieves a 16.8% false detection rate, outperforming current Wasm binary checkers and native sanitizers in detecting memory bugs and undefined behaviors. Furthermore, when compared with the binary-only fuzzer, WBSan uncovers more crashes and achieves greater code coverage.
Junzhou He, Liyan Huang, Cai Fu, Weihang Wang 0001
WWW2
2024 StackSight: Unveiling WebAssembly through Large Language Models and Neurosymbolic Chain-of-Thought Decompilation
abstract
WebAssembly enables near-native execution in web applications and is increasingly adopted for tasks that demand high performance and robust security. However, its assembly-like syntax, implicit stack machine, and low-level data types make it extremely difficult for human developers to understand, spurring the need for effective WebAssembly reverse engineering techniques. In this paper, we propose StackSight, a novel neurosymbolic approach that combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with advanced program analysis to decompile complex WebAssembly code into readable C++ snippets. StackSight visualizes and tracks virtual stack alterations via a static analysis algorithm and then applies chain-of-thought prompting to harness LLM's complex reasoning capabilities. Evaluation results show that StackSight significantly improves WebAssembly decompilation. Our user study also demonstrates that code snippets generated by StackSight have significantly higher win rates and enable a better grasp of code semantics.
Weike Fang, Zhejian Zhou, Junzhou He, Weihang Wang 0001
ICML3