Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Muxi Chen

dblp:316/2877 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 57% Time series and sequential data · 16% Deep learning architectures and training · 9%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
1.222023
HiBug: On Human-Interpretable Model Debug · NeurIPS 2023
HybridRepair: towards annotation-efficient repair for deep learning models · ISSTA 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
model debugging
0.922025
HiBug: On Human-Interpretable Model Debug · NeurIPS 2023
HiBug2: Efficient and Interpretable Error Slice Discovery for Comprehensive Model Debugging · ICLR 2025
Requirements engineering and software design › inconsistency management
model repair
0.912025
HiBug2: Efficient and Interpretable Error Slice Discovery for Comprehensive Model Debugging · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.712023
HiBug: On Human-Interpretable Model Debug · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.712023
Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting? · AAAI 2023
Data mining › time series analysis › time series forecasting
long-term time series forecasting
0.712023
Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting? · AAAI 2023
Data mining › time series analysis
time series forecasting
0.712023
Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting? · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model maintenance
0.612022
HybridRepair: towards annotation-efficient repair for deep learning models · ISSTA 2022
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › temporal modeling
multi-scale temporal modeling
0.612022
SCINet: Time Series Modeling and Forecasting with Sample Convolution and Interaction · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
neural network repair
0.612022
HybridRepair: towards annotation-efficient repair for deep learning models · ISSTA 2022
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
time series forecasting
0.612022
SCINet: Time Series Modeling and Forecasting with Sample Convolution and Interaction · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
time series modeling
0.612022
SCINet: Time Series Modeling and Forecasting with Sample Convolution and Interaction · NeurIPS 2022
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.212023
HiBug: On Human-Interpretable Model Debug · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

slice enumeration algorithm · 1.7positional encoding · 1.3linear model · 1.3vision-language model · 0.7large pre-trained model · 0.7sample convolution · 0.6recursive downsampling · 0.6multi-resolution feature aggregation · 0.6annotation-efficient learning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 HiBug2: Efficient and Interpretable Error Slice Discovery for Comprehensive Model Debugging
abstract
Despite the significant success of deep learning models in computer vision, they often exhibit systematic failures on specific data subsets, known as error slices. Identifying and mitigating these error slices is crucial to enhancing model robustness and reliability in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we introduce HiBug2, an automated framework for error slice discovery and model repair. HiBug2 first generates task-specific visual attributes to highlight instances prone to errors through an interpretable and structured process. It then employs an efficient slice enumeration algorithm to systematically identify error slices, overcoming the combinatorial challenges that arise during slice exploration. Additionally, HiBug2 extends its capabilities by predicting error slices beyond the validation set, addressing a key limitation of prior approaches. Extensive experiments across multiple domains — including image classification, pose estimation, and object detection — show that HiBug2 not only improves the coherence and precision of identified error slices but also significantly enhances the model repair capabilities.
Muxi Chen, Chenchen Zhao 0001, Qiang Xu 0001
ICLR1
2023 Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?
abstract
Recently, there has been a surge of Transformer-based solutions for the long-term time series forecasting (LTSF) task. Despite the growing performance over the past few years, we question the validity of this line of research in this work. Specifically, Transformers is arguably the most successful solution to extract the semantic correlations among the elements in a long sequence. However, in time series modeling, we are to extract the temporal relations in an ordered set of continuous points. While employing positional encoding and using tokens to embed sub-series in Transformers facilitate preserving some ordering information, the nature of the permutation-invariant self-attention mechanism inevitably results in temporal information loss. To validate our claim, we introduce a set of embarrassingly simple one-layer linear models named LTSF-Linear for comparison. Experimental results on nine real-life datasets show that LTSF-Linear surprisingly outperforms existing sophisticated Transformer-based LTSF models in all cases, and often by a large margin. Moreover, we conduct comprehensive empirical studies to explore the impacts of various design elements of LTSF models on their temporal relation extraction capability. We hope this surprising finding opens up new research directions for the LTSF task. We also advocate revisiting the validity of Transformer-based solutions for other time series analysis tasks (e.g., anomaly detection) in the future.
Ailing Zeng, Muxi Chen, Lei Zhang 0001, Qiang Xu 0001
AAAI2
2023 HiBug: On Human-Interpretable Model Debug
abstract
Machine learning models can frequently produce systematic errors on critical subsets (or slices) of data that share common attributes. Discovering and explaining such model bugs is crucial for reliable model deployment. However, existing bug discovery and interpretation methods usually involve heavy human intervention and annotation, which can be cumbersome and have low bug coverage. In this paper, we propose HiBug, an automated framework for interpretable model debugging. Our approach utilizes large pre-trained models, such as chatGPT, to suggest human-understandable attributes that are related to the targeted computer vision tasks. By leveraging pre-trained vision-language models, we can efficiently identify common visual attributes of underperforming data slices using human-understandable terms. This enables us to uncover rare cases in the training data, identify spurious correlations in the model, and use the interpretable debug results to select or generate new training data for model improvement. Experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of the HiBug framework.
Muxi Chen, Yu Li 0007, Qiang Xu 0001
NeurIPS1
2022 HybridRepair: towards annotation-efficient repair for deep learning models
abstract
A well-trained deep learning (DL) model often cannot achieve expected performance after deployment due to the mismatch between the distributions of the training data and the field data in the operational environment. Therefore, repairing DL models is critical, especially when deployed on increasingly larger tasks with shifted distributions.
Yu Li 0007, Muxi Chen, Qiang Xu 0001
ISSTA2
2022 SCINet: Time Series Modeling and Forecasting with Sample Convolution and Interaction
abstract
One unique property of time series is that the temporal relations are largely preserved after downsampling into two sub-sequences. By taking advantage of this property, we propose a novel neural network architecture that conducts sample convolution and interaction for temporal modeling and forecasting, named SCINet. Specifically, SCINet is a recursive downsample-convolve-interact architecture. In each layer, we use multiple convolutional filters to extract distinct yet valuable temporal features from the downsampled sub-sequences or features. By combining these rich features aggregated from multiple resolutions, SCINet effectively models time series with complex temporal dynamics. Experimental results show that SCINet achieves significant forecasting accuracy improvements over both existing convolutional models and Transformer-based solutions across various real-world time series forecasting datasets. Our codes and data are available at https://github.com/cure-lab/SCINet.
Minhao Liu, Ailing Zeng, Muxi Chen, Qiuxia Lai, Lingna Ma, Qiang Xu 0001
NeurIPS3