“Sustainability −4- HRI, HRI −4-Sustainability” offers hands-on engagement with the HRI 2025 conference theme, “Robots for a Sustainable World”. This workshop will explore the relationship between HRI and sustainable development and stimulate discussion on how we can make our own research practices more sustainable. We propose a full-day workshop, featuring morning discussions with sustainability experts and activists, and an afternoon hands-on activity aimed at understanding how robotics research can help in creating sustainable futures. We will broadly answer the following questions: How can we, as robotic researchers, help address sustainable development responsibly? Equally, how can we ensure that our HRI research practices minimises ecological footprints and operates within ethical and sustainable frameworks? We envision two practical outcomes of this workshop: a “sustainability statement” that can be submitted together with future HRI research papers, and a paper gathering insights and reflections from the workshop. We welcome researchers and students at any career stage and from any subfield of HRI to attend and contribute.

Robots are imperfect and will often fail multiple times during interactions. Despite this, there is a knowledge gap in understanding how humans respond to successive robot failures. In a user study with 26 participants, we explored human responses to successive robot conversational errors. We found that users typically resort to reformulating their prompts, modifying the verbal tone and cadence when encountering repeated failures. A range of emotional displays emerges, including confusion, frustration, and occasional amusement, which evolve throughout the interaction. We further conducted a statistical analysis of participants' behavioral features, revealing insights that could inform automated approaches to detecting and responding to robot errors in successive failure scenarios.

The integration of large language models (LLMs) into conversational robots has made human-robot conversations more dynamic. Yet, LLM-powered conversational robots remain prone to errors, e.g., misunderstanding user intent, prematurely interrupting users, or failing to respond altogether. Detecting and addressing these failures is critical for preventing conversational breakdowns, avoiding task disruptions, and sustaining user trust. To tackle this problem, the ERR@HRI 2.0 Challenge provides a multimodal dataset of LLM-powered conversational robot failures during human-robot conversations and encourages researchers to benchmark machine learning models designed to detect robot failures. The dataset includes 16 hours of dyadic human-robot interactions, incorporating facial, speech, and head movement features. Each interaction is annotated with the presence or absence of robot errors from the system perspective, and perceived user intention to correct for a mismatch between robot behavior and user expectation. Participants are invited to form teams and develop machine learning models that detect these failures using multimodal data. Submissions will be evaluated using various performance metrics, including detection accuracy and false positive rate. This challenge represents another key step toward improving failure detection in human-robot interaction through social signal analysis.

Despite the recent advancements in robotics and machine learning (ML), the deployment of autonomous robots in our everyday lives is still an open challenge. This is due to multiple reasons among which are their frequent mistakes, such as interrupting people or having delayed responses, as well as their limited ability to understand human speech, i.e., failure in tasks like transcribing speech to text. These mistakes may disrupt interactions and negatively influence human perception of these robots. To address this problem, robots need to have the ability to detect human-robot interaction (HRI) failures. The ERR@HRI 2024 challenge tackles this by offering a benchmark multimodal dataset of robot failures during human-robot interactions, encouraging researchers to develop and benchmark multimodal machine learning models to detect these failures. We created a dataset featuring multimodal non-verbal interaction data, including facial, speech, and pose features from video clips of interactions with a robotic coach, annotated with labels indicating the presence or absence of robot mistakes, user awkwardness, and interaction ruptures, allowing for the training and evaluation of predictive models. Challenge participants have been invited to submit their multimodal ML models for detection of robot errors, to be evaluated against various performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, with and without a margin of error reflecting the time-sensitivity of these metrics. The results of this challenge will help the research field in better understanding the robot failures in human-robot interactions and designing autonomous robots that can mitigate their own errors after successfully detecting them.

Humans have the ability to anticipate what will happen in their environment based on perceived information. Their anticipation is often manifested as an externally observable behavioral reaction, which cues other people in the environment that something bad might happen. As robots become more prevalent in human spaces, robots can leverage these visible anticipatory responses to assess whether their own actions might be "a bad idea?" In this study, we delved into the potential of human anticipatory reaction recognition to predict outcomes. We conducted a user study wherein 30 participants watched videos of action scenarios and were asked about their anticipated outcome of the situation shown in each video ("good" or "bad"). We collected video and audio data of the participants reactions as they were watching these videos. We then carefully analyzed the participants’ behavioral anticipatory responses; this data was used to train machine learning models to predict anticipated outcomes based on human observable behavior. Reactions are multimodal, compound and diverse, and we find significant differences in facial reactions. Model performances are around 0.5-0.6 test accuracy, and increase notably when nonreactive participants are excluded from the dataset. We discuss the implications of these findings and future work. This research offers insights into improving the safety and efficiency of human-robot interactions, contributing to the evolving field of robotics and human-robot collaboration.

In recent years, the awareness of the academy around responsible research has notably increased. For instance, with advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence, recent efforts have been made to promote ethical, fair, and inclusive AI and robotics. To better understand if and to what extent HRI is incentivizing researchers to engage in responsible research, we conducted an exploratory review of the publishing guidelines for the most popular HRI conference venues. We identified 18 conferences which published at least 7 HRI papers in 2022. From these, we discuss four themes relevant to conducting responsible HRI research in line with the Responsible Research and Innovation framework: ethical and human participant considerations, transparency and reproducibility, accessibility and inclusion, and plagiarism and LLM use. We identify several gaps and room for improvement within HRI regarding responsible research. Finally, we establish a call to action to provoke conversations among HRI researchers about the importance of conducting responsible research within emerging fields like HRI.

This paper introduces CORAE, a novel web-based open-source tool for COntinuous Retrospective Affect Evaluation, designed to capture continuous affect data about interpersonal perceptions in dyadic interactions. Grounded in behavioral ecology perspectives of emotion, this approach replaces valence as the relevant rating dimension with approach and withdrawal, reflecting the degree to which behavior is perceived as increasing or decreasing social distance. We conducted a study to experimentally validate the efficacy of our platform with 24 participants. The tool’s effectiveness was tested in the context of dyadic negotiation, revealing insights about how interpersonal dynamics evolve over time. We find that the continuous affect rating method is consistent with individuals’ perception of the overall interaction. This paper contributes to the growing body of research on affective computing and offers a valuable tool for researchers interested in investigating the temporal dynamics of affect and emotion in social interactions.

For a robot to repair its own error, it must first know it has made a mistake. One way that people detect errors is from the implicit reactions from bystanders - their confusion, smirks, or giggles clue us in that something unexpected occurred. To enable robots to detect and act on bystander responses to task failures, we developed a novel method to elicit bystander responses to human and robot errors. Using 46 different stimulus videos featuring a variety of human and machine task failures, we collected a total of 2,452 webcam videos of human reactions from 54 participants. To test the viability of the collected data, we used the bystander reaction dataset as input to a deep-learning model, BADNet, to predict failure occurrence. We tested different data labeling methods and learned how they affect model performance, achieving precisions above 90%. We discuss strategies (manual labelling, failure-vs-control, and failure-time) used to model bystander reactions and predict failure, and how this approach can be used in real-world robotic deployments to detect errors and improve robot performance. As part of this work, we also contribute with the “Bystander Affect Detection” (BAD) dataset of bystander reactions, supporting the development of better prediction models.

Robots can affect group dynamics. In particular, prior work has shown that robots that use hand-crafted gaze heuristics can influence human participation in group interactions. However, hand-crafting robot behaviors can be difficult and might have unexpected results in groups. Thus, this work explores learning robot gaze behaviors that balance human participation in conversational interactions. More specifically, we examine two techniques for learning a gaze policy from data: imitation learning (IL) and batch reinforcement learning (RL). First, we formulate the problem of learning a gaze policy as a sequential decision-making task focused on human turn-taking. Second, we experimentally show that IL can be used to combine strategies from hand-crafted gaze behaviors, and we formulate a novel reward function to achieve a similar result using batch RL. Finally, we conduct an offline evaluation of IL and RL policies and compare them via a user study (N=50). The results from the study show that the learned behavior policies did not compromise the interaction. Interestingly, the proposed reward for the RL formulation enabled the robot to encourage participants to take more turns during group human-robot interactions than one of the gaze heuristic behaviors from prior work. Also, the imitation learning policy led to more active participation from human participants than another prior heuristic behavior.

To achieve seamless interactions, robots have to be capable of reliably detecting affective states in real time. One of the possible states that humans go through while interacting with robots is frustration. Detecting frustration from RGB images can be challenging in some real-world situations; thus, we investigate in this work whether thermal imaging can be used to create a model that is capable of detecting frustration induced by cognitive load and failure. To train our model, we collected a data set from 18 participants experiencing both types of frustration induced by a robot. The model was tested using features from several modalities: thermal, RGB, Electrodermal Activity (EDA), and all three combined. When data from both frustration cases were combined and used as training input, the model reached an accuracy of 89% with just RGB features, 87% using only thermal features, 84% using EDA, and 86% when using all modalities. Furthermore, the highest accuracy for the thermal data was reached using three facial regions of interest: nose, forehead and lower lip.

Human-robot non-verbal communication has been a growing focus of research, as we realize its importance to achieve interaction goals (e.g. modulating turn-taking) and manage human perception of the interaction. Consequently, the development of models for robot non-verbal behavior, such as gaze, should be informed by studies of human reaction and perception to that behavior. Here, we look at data from two studies where two humans interact describing words to a robot. The robot tries to balance participation of the two players through a combination of gaze aversion, looking at the listener and looking at the speaker. We analyze how momentary gaze patterns reflect in the participant's turn length and perception of the robot, as well as in the participation imbalance. Our findings may be used as recommendations towards crafting robot gaze behaviors in multiparty interactions.