EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dongju Cha
dblp:316/6766
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Edge and fog computing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Edge and fog computing › edge offloading
split computing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Split Computing for Mobile Devices: Energy and Latency Perspective · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
computation offloading |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Split Computing for Mobile Devices: Energy and Latency Perspective · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
on-device inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Split Computing for Mobile Devices: Energy and Latency Perspective · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
queueing analysis · 1.7heuristic algorithm · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Split Computing for Mobile Devices: Energy and Latency PerspectiveabstractTo tackle the difficulties of running sophisticated deep neural network (DNN) models on mobile devices, split computing presents a viable solution by offloading computations to the edge server. Current split computing schemes typically aim to lower either inference latency or energy use separately; however, optimizing both simultaneously is quite challenging due to numerous shifting factors, such as intensive continuous DNN model inferences, DNN model traits, and device/network conditions. Moreover, in practical applications, edge server overload might lead to substantial queuing delays, adding complexity to the optimization process. This paper outlines a joint optimization problem that simultaneously seeks to minimize both inference latency and energy consumption, with a distinct inclusion of queue clearance latency for an accurate analysis of the continuously generated DNN model inferences. To address this intricate optimization challenge, we introduce a low-complexity heuristic algorithm that sets split point decisions based on the residual energy of mobile devices for each DNN inference cycle. Upon evaluation, our proposed algorithm demonstrates notable improvements by reducing inference latency by between$73.37\%$and$99.39\%$, and cutting down energy usage by between$39.97\%$and$94.67\%$compared to fully local processing on mobile devices. Daeyoung Jung, Jaewook Lee 0002, Hyeonjae Jeong, Dongju Cha, Sangheon Pack |
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. | 4 |